Page 1 of 1
Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 15:13
by jameswilson
https://youtu.be/oaDBasnvOX8?si=1iIuBUDY5tyuUJUM
Thought it deserved its own thread as there’s a touch of controversy with the low blows.
I thought the low blows he got warnings and points for were legit low blows. There was then another I thought was low after he had the points taken off that he only had a warning for which I thought was odd he didn't have more points off.
Aside fr9m that I thought he dealt with Allen easily and I had him winning every round before you Takam the two points off.
Thoughts on the fight and the refereeing?
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 15:21
by margaret thatcher
allen collapses after being drubbed every round vs price, fainted/dizzy from sparring, perforated ear here losing every round.........shady endings when he wins too. he shouldnt be boxing and beating him up aint much these days
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 15:45
by Jaguar
Clarke should've been disqualified. Allen would've been had it been him who did the same.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 17:18
by samwbr
It was a total waste of time, Clarke isn't suited to the pro ranks and Allen needs to stop.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 18:14
by deadpan
Jaguar wrote: ↑05 Sep 2023, 15:45
Clarke should've been disqualified. Allen would've been had it been him who did the same.
Definitely.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 05 Sep 2023, 19:28
by coneye
Once again this fight just shown the disdain these promoters have for British boxing fans
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 06 Sep 2023, 12:32
by emallini
Allen was pretending to get hit low.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 06 Sep 2023, 15:51
by rd350lc
emallini wrote: ↑06 Sep 2023, 12:32
Allen was pretending to get hit low.
Almost Usyk like , at least he didn't milk it like the great one did .
Some of them were well south tho ! .
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 06 Sep 2023, 16:13
by funso banjo baby
Allen's shorts were constantly worn low exposing the full protector
That's all I have to say about this toilet bowl of a fight.
Some still think Clarke would beat Wardley?
![[icon_shame.gif] :shame:](./images/smilies/icon_shame.gif)
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 06 Sep 2023, 17:18
by Teddy's Toupee
funso banjo baby wrote: ↑06 Sep 2023, 16:13
Allen's shorts were constantly worn low exposing his tiny genitals.
That's all I have to say about this toilet bowl of a fight.
I didn't see that. They must be small.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 07 Sep 2023, 10:50
by jameswilson
funso banjo baby wrote: ↑06 Sep 2023, 16:13
Allen's shorts were constantly worn low exposing the full protector
That's all I have to say about this toilet bowl of a fight.
Some still think Clarke would beat Wardley?
I don't think he beats Wardley.
I think Dacres 120-108s him.
I think given how poor Adeleye has looked Clarke v Adeleye is a pick em.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 07 Sep 2023, 18:29
by THEBUTCH
Allen is the most over exposed fringe British title contender I can think of.
Complete waste of time, although I suppose Clarke did get a few more rounds under his belt.
Admittedly Clarke isn't setting the British heavyweight scene on fire, but he's definitely in the mix at British title level.
Re: Clarke v Allen
Posted: 09 Sep 2023, 13:18
by SeanBrennan
tbf to Allen he was back training Joe Hayden on the Monday.
He does not take any money off Joe for training or managing him.
Might not scale the heights as a boxer, but a good human being imo.