Lawrence Okolie vs. Kevin Lerena - WBC Ordered
Posted: 25 May 2024, 11:32
WBC confirmed Okolie must defend against Lerena next.
Thoughts on this?
Thoughts on this?
Rozanski's purse against Okolie was around 250,000 euros from what I've heard with Okolie receiving a bit more than that. It was the biggest payday in Rozanksi's career.
thanks Heldenjaeger.Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑26 May 2024, 10:51Rozanski's purse against Okolie was around 250,000 euros from what I've heard with Okolie receiving a bit more than that. It was the biggest payday in Rozanksi's career.
Could be a little more for Okolie vs Lerena.
Good fight this. I don't think Lerena wins unless he puts it on OkolieSeanBrennan wrote: ↑26 May 2024, 12:45thanks Heldenjaeger.Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑26 May 2024, 10:51Rozanski's purse against Okolie was around 250,000 euros from what I've heard with Okolie receiving a bit more than that. It was the biggest payday in Rozanksi's career.
Could be a little more for Okolie vs Lerena.
Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Furygregregegg wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 22:00 Okolie needs to stop the bulshit and go to heavyweight.
He is 31 years old 6”5 and playing around in a made up division… 230+ okole is a problem for anyone.
His style can be bad to watch, but honestly with the heavyweight Div alive and well, and the big names basicaly on the out, why not position yourself for a 5 year run in the premier division.
Guys like Usyk especially and even Wilder have made the bridgerweight division redundantControversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:02Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Furygregregegg wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 22:00 Okolie needs to stop the bulshit and go to heavyweight.
He is 31 years old 6”5 and playing around in a made up division… 230+ okole is a problem for anyone.
His style can be bad to watch, but honestly with the heavyweight Div alive and well, and the big names basicaly on the out, why not position yourself for a 5 year run in the premier division.
If they want to do anything they should up the CW limit slightly, maybe make it 205 or possibly 210. But to have another division where its 200-224 makes no sense.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:12Guys like Usyk especially and even Wilder have made the bridgerweight division redundantControversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:02Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Furygregregegg wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 22:00 Okolie needs to stop the bulshit and go to heavyweight.
He is 31 years old 6”5 and playing around in a made up division… 230+ okole is a problem for anyone.
His style can be bad to watch, but honestly with the heavyweight Div alive and well, and the big names basicaly on the out, why not position yourself for a 5 year run in the premier division.
Quite! It's not about lacking the weight, but the talent/confidence to compete at HW. A division for non-elite fighters to ply their trade and claim to be world class. About as valid as a WBU title but with the smoke and mirrors of more recognised initials. Okolie shouldn't be part of it.Controversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:02Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Furygregregegg wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 22:00 Okolie needs to stop the bulshit and go to heavyweight.
He is 31 years old 6”5 and playing around in a made up division… 230+ okole is a problem for anyone.
His style can be bad to watch, but honestly with the heavyweight Div alive and well, and the big names basicaly on the out, why not position yourself for a 5 year run in the premier division.
They should put cruiser up to 215 and introduce sinething between light heavy and cruiser at 195 lbsControversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:19If they want to do anything they should up the CW limit slightly, maybe make it 205 or possibly 210. But to have another division where its 200-224 makes no sense.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:12They should put cruiser up to 215 and introduce sinething between light heavy and cruiser at 195 lbsControversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:02
Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Fury
Guys like Usyk especially and even Wilder have made the bridgerweight division redundant
The undisputed heavyweight champ is 223 no weight cut… bridger can easily be 240 if they want. Probably near 250 if they are comfortable doing silly weight cuts.Controversial wrote: ↑29 May 2024, 05:02Bridger weight makes no sense, in that 'title' fight Okolie weighed the same as Usyk did against Furygregregegg wrote: ↑25 May 2024, 22:00 Okolie needs to stop the bulshit and go to heavyweight.
He is 31 years old 6”5 and playing around in a made up division… 230+ okole is a problem for anyone.
His style can be bad to watch, but honestly with the heavyweight Div alive and well, and the big names basicaly on the out, why not position yourself for a 5 year run in the premier division.
KevinLerena wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021, 14:51 Hi All
Please re instate me in the world cruiserweight division on boxrec where I was in the top 10 ( I think I was at #5 ) . I am not campaigning in that Bridgerweight division.
I made the decision to stay at cruiserweight as I am the current IBO Cruiserweight Champion , #2 in the WBA , #4 in the ring magazine and the IBF will put me back at number 2. I could possibly be fighting for the WBA world title in June. I have informed the wbc that I will not be participating in the new “ Bridgerweight “ division and I am campaigning at cruiserweight where I’m currently a champion.
Please could you confirm receipt of this and let me know when it shows my rating back in the cruiserweight world rankings on boxrec. Thanks so much
But BoxRec wasn't removing boxers cus they campaigned at BW was they?NoScoutingReports wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:24 Here it is, was a bit further back than I thought, knew I hadn't imagined it![]()
KevinLerena wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021, 14:51 Hi All
Please re instate me in the world cruiserweight division on boxrec where I was in the top 10 ( I think I was at #5 ) . I am not campaigning in that Bridgerweight division.
I made the decision to stay at cruiserweight as I am the current IBO Cruiserweight Champion , #2 in the WBA , #4 in the ring magazine and the IBF will put me back at number 2. I could possibly be fighting for the WBA world title in June. I have informed the wbc that I will not be participating in the new “ Bridgerweight “ division and I am campaigning at cruiserweight where I’m currently a champion.
Please could you confirm receipt of this and let me know when it shows my rating back in the cruiserweight world rankings on boxrec. Thanks so much
Not sure, just remembered he was initially opposed to BW.Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:27But BoxRec wasn't removing boxers cus they campaigned at BW was they?NoScoutingReports wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:24 Here it is, was a bit further back than I thought, knew I hadn't imagined it![]()
KevinLerena wrote: ↑31 Mar 2021, 14:51 Hi All
Please re instate me in the world cruiserweight division on boxrec where I was in the top 10 ( I think I was at #5 ) . I am not campaigning in that Bridgerweight division.
I made the decision to stay at cruiserweight as I am the current IBO Cruiserweight Champion , #2 in the WBA , #4 in the ring magazine and the IBF will put me back at number 2. I could possibly be fighting for the WBA world title in June. I have informed the wbc that I will not be participating in the new “ Bridgerweight “ division and I am campaigning at cruiserweight where I’m currently a champion.
Please could you confirm receipt of this and let me know when it shows my rating back in the cruiserweight world rankings on boxrec. Thanks so much
I thought they was just putting them in the heavvyweight rankings.
Have a look here:Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:27But BoxRec wasn't removing boxers cus they campaigned at BW was they?
I thought they was just putting them in the heavvyweight rankings.
I agree. It does make them look somewhat silly.Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 09:45Have a look here:Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:27But BoxRec wasn't removing boxers cus they campaigned at BW was they?
I thought they was just putting them in the heavvyweight rankings.
viewtopic.php?p=6019748#p6019748
Many of the 29 boxers ranked at bridgerweight by the WBC are not ranked by boxrec at all. Same for the WBA bridgerweight boxers. Zhaoxin Zhang and Evgeny Romanov both lost their boxrec rankings since I made that post.
I'll happily repeat myself, the way boxrec is handling this is immature and unprofessional. There's clearly an agenda behind the decision making, not good enough.
I asked this before and adding a new division in requires a massive recoding of the website, so Boxrec were / are waiting to see if the division actually survives before committing to the coding update.Heldenjaeger wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 09:45Have a look here:Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 May 2024, 06:27But BoxRec wasn't removing boxers cus they campaigned at BW was they?
I thought they was just putting them in the heavvyweight rankings.
viewtopic.php?p=6019748#p6019748
Many of the 29 boxers ranked at bridgerweight by the WBC are not ranked by boxrec at all. Same for the WBA bridgerweight boxers. Zhaoxin Zhang and Evgeny Romanov both lost their boxrec rankings since I made that post.
I'll happily repeat myself, the way boxrec is handling this is immature and unprofessional. There's clearly an agenda behind the decision making, not good enough.