Problem with Ratings....

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 30 Mar 2005, 06:21

http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?division=Welterweight

Karl Taylor #9?

kevin · Post by **kevin** » 30 Mar 2005, 06:22

Looks like it is updating as most have 1500 points

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 30 Mar 2005, 06:39

The problem with ratings is that they are decided subjectively and are not an exact science. Someone's opinion is often different to someone else's.

Chris Byrd World Heavyweight No.1????

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 30 Mar 2005, 06:41

double posted

computerrank · Post by **computerrank** » 30 Mar 2005, 06:56

liamlion wrote:The problem with ratings is that they are decided subjectively and are not an exact science. Someone's opinion is often different to someone else's.

Chris Byrd World Heavyweight No.1????

liamlion,

they are quite exact science - at least BoxRec Ratings are.

Questions about BOXREC RATINGS? READ HERE FIRST! - please have a look at:

http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20574

Best regards
Martin

liamlion · Post by **liamlion** » 30 Mar 2005, 07:03

Didnt mean to be so disregarding. Boxrec have clearly established a mathematical equation to create its own rankings.