Page 1 of 1
Problem with Ratings....
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 06:21
by DavidPayne
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 06:22
by kevin
Looks like it is updating as most have 1500 points
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 06:39
by liamlion
The problem with ratings is that they are decided subjectively and are not an exact science. Someone's opinion is often different to someone else's.
Chris Byrd World Heavyweight No.1????
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 06:41
by liamlion
double posted

Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 06:56
by computerrank
liamlion wrote:The problem with ratings is that they are decided subjectively and are not an exact science. Someone's opinion is often different to someone else's.
Chris Byrd World Heavyweight No.1????
liamlion,
they are quite exact science - at least BoxRec Ratings are.
Questions about BOXREC RATINGS? READ HERE FIRST! - please have a look at:
http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20574
Best regards
Martin
Posted: 30 Mar 2005, 07:03
by liamlion
Didnt mean to be so disregarding. Boxrec have clearly established a mathematical equation to create its own rankings.