Idk if there's already a thread on this subject but - is this guy part of boxxr or what?
Hearn and Warren have both accused him of it, but he has denied it.
Then today he's on the radio saying he took part in negotiations for Buatsi vs Hutchinson.
Wait what? Why are you negotiating a fight for Buatsi?
Are Talksport ok with this? That one of their employees can apparently just use their platform to promote a business he seems to be involved in?
Seems weird. And if he is involved then listeners shoujd be told so that they realise they are not actually getting unbiased opinions from this guy.
Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
-
johninmanchester
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 17:08
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
I deliberately avoid all of that staged outrage punditry bollocks, it's so phoney, controlled opposition , morning zoo surface level analysis but hey they argue sometimes so it must be raw and real. It's just like Piers Morgan's niche now, dripping with insincerity, not driven by journalism in the slightest
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
Sound and Fury signifying absolutely fu|<ing nothing
The talksport website headlines are so level 1 clickbait awful at times
Tabloid headlines get promoted in the Algorithm, you might have noticed some of your favourite "content creators" doing it more and more, phoney thumbnails and exaggerations appealing to lowest common denominator, AI voice with video stolen from other older better works
The talksport website headlines are so level 1 clickbait awful at times
Tabloid headlines get promoted in the Algorithm, you might have noticed some of your favourite "content creators" doing it more and more, phoney thumbnails and exaggerations appealing to lowest common denominator, AI voice with video stolen from other older better works
-
TheLeprechaun
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 5164
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
Morgans is an odious cretin of a man. Always has been.Cask wrote: ↑04 Dec 2024, 20:38 I deliberately avoid all of that staged outrage punditry bollocks, it's so phoney, controlled opposition , morning zoo surface level analysis but hey they argue sometimes so it must be raw and real. It's just like Piers Morgan's niche now, dripping with insincerity, not driven by journalism in the slightest
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
He’s said he doesn’t have equity in Boxxer so I’d be inclined to believe it.johninmanchester wrote: ↑04 Dec 2024, 19:58 Idk if there's already a thread on this subject but - is this guy part of boxxr or what?
Hearn and Warren have both accused him of it, but he has denied it.
Then today he's on the radio saying he took part in negotiations for Buatsi vs Hutchinson.
Wait what? Why are you negotiating a fight for Buatsi?
Are Talksport ok with this? That one of their employees can apparently just use their platform to promote a business he seems to be involved in?
Seems weird. And if he is involved then listeners shoujd be told so that they realise they are not actually getting unbiased opinions from this guy.
I know Boxxer were helped at the start by a group of wealthy investors. Perhaps Jordan helped facilitate some of that. Who knows.
I do find Jordan and Spencer Oliver favour Boxxer and their fighters. Oliver also does work for Boxxer so I can kind of understand that. I don’t think he’s a very good pundit though.
You can tell by the way Jordan interviews Shalom, Hearn and Warren that he either favours or feels sorry for Shalom. He’s far more aggressive with Hearn/Warren.
-
johninmanchester
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 101
- Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 17:08
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
The way the Sunday Times pieces laid out all these different companies attached to Boxxer, it's possible he could deny having equity "in Boxxer" directly, and that be true, yet still have equity in a related /dependant vehicle.maverick23 wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 02:44 He’s said he doesn’t have equity in Boxxer so I’d be inclined to believe it.
It's very telling i think that he's not taken any legal action against Hearn and Warren for both publicly accusing him of having a financial interest in Boxxer.
If that's not true then it's slanderous, it defames his supposed independence as a journalist. Why then has he not taken action?
Not only the way he interviews him but the way he shoehorns Shalom name into conversations constantly and always seems to be putting positive spin on him and boxxer.maverick23 wrote: ↑
You can tell by the way Jordan interviews Shalom, Hearn and Warren that he either favours or feels sorry for Shalom. He’s far more aggressive with Hearn/Warren.
Shalom draws almost universal criticism from the boxing fanbase in every comment section you read, doesn't appear to have any fans, yet Jordan is organically such a huge fan of his that he's channeling his Talksport gig into being the boxxer hype man, for free? Doesn't add up.
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
Better off just not listening to Talk sport or Jordan in general
-
golden_labrador
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
wait a minute, Simon Jordan is a real person? WTF
I thought it was a Talksport comedy character like Alan Partridge, with some guy in prosthetics
there's no way that's real. mind blown
I thought it was a Talksport comedy character like Alan Partridge, with some guy in prosthetics
there's no way that's real. mind blown
-
maverick23
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 10375
- Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
Jordan wouldn’t go down the legal route purely because Warren/Hearn said they thought he had an involvement in Boxxer. It would be expensive, difficult to prove because what Hearn/Warren said was fairly vague and it would impact access for TalkSPORT.johninmanchester wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 03:31The way the Sunday Times pieces laid out all these different companies attached to Boxxer, it's possible he could deny having equity "in Boxxer" directly, and that be true, yet still have equity in a related /dependant vehicle.maverick23 wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 02:44 He’s said he doesn’t have equity in Boxxer so I’d be inclined to believe it.
It's very telling i think that he's not taken any legal action against Hearn and Warren for both publicly accusing him of having a financial interest in Boxxer.
If that's not true then it's slanderous, it defames his supposed independence as a journalist. Why then has he not taken action?
Not only the way he interviews him but the way he shoehorns Shalom name into conversations constantly and always seems to be putting positive spin on him and boxxer.maverick23 wrote: ↑
You can tell by the way Jordan interviews Shalom, Hearn and Warren that he either favours or feels sorry for Shalom. He’s far more aggressive with Hearn/Warren.
Shalom draws almost universal criticism from the boxing fanbase in every comment section you read, doesn't appear to have any fans, yet Jordan is organically such a huge fan of his that he's channeling his Talksport gig into being the boxxer hype man, for free? Doesn't add up.
Jordan kept pushing in the last 2-3 weeks that Benn was cleared due to jurisdiction yet he only changed his tune this week. I can’t see anyone going after him/TalkSPORT for the same reason. Not a battle worth fighting.
I think TalkSPORT has gone very easy on Shalom’s links to Maz Majeed. A bloke who is dodgy as hell yet has been instrumental in bringing several boxers over to Boxxer/Sky and the claims in The Times don’t make good reading. If that was Eddie then I think Simon would have been all over him for it.
Re: Simon Jordan (Talksport) and Boxxer
And it drips out of every poreTheLeprechaun wrote: ↑05 Dec 2024, 00:37Morgans is an odious cretin of a man. Always has been.Cask wrote: ↑04 Dec 2024, 20:38 I deliberately avoid all of that staged outrage punditry bollocks, it's so phoney, controlled opposition , morning zoo surface level analysis but hey they argue sometimes so it must be raw and real. It's just like Piers Morgan's niche now, dripping with insincerity, not driven by journalism in the slightest