I have just seen a video from Carl Froch about Benn v Eubank.
He correctly asks whether Conor Benn now has a British licence and is he serving, or has served a silent ban.
That also begs the question about the Dillan Whyte B sample. Did that ever get found and resolved.
Unless I have missed the outcome of these mysteries can anyone fill the blanks in.
Carl Froch video
Re: Carl Froch video
Benn doesn't have a license. He has an American one.
Nor does Fury.
They do have something in common.
Nor does Fury.
They do have something in common.
-
Callowland
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 408
- Joined: 30 Sep 2011, 17:56
Re: Carl Froch video
So the Board have allowed the fight to go ahead on the basis of Benn's American license even with the unresolved drug stuff in the background.
I am just trying to understand it based on Carl's comments about it.
Re: Carl Froch video
If Benn has an American licence,what is the point of the BBBOC?Callowland wrote: ↑21 Feb 2025, 06:55So the Board have allowed the fight to go ahead on the basis of Benn's American license even with the unresolved drug stuff in the background.
I am just trying to understand it based on Carl's comments about it.