Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15709
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
If you are about to rank Bud Crawford in the top 100 pound per pound all-time boxers list, where would you rank him now, at this moment?
He has been undisputed champion in 3 weight classes. He is undefeated at 38 years old.
Is there any more mountains for Bud to climb?
He has been undisputed champion in 3 weight classes. He is undefeated at 38 years old.
Is there any more mountains for Bud to climb?
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He's among the greatests. The Sugar class.
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He's become a Top all time boxer. I'd put him above Duran off of this. Possibly over Leonard even. He's in THAT league
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Last night was no upset, imo. My money was on Crawford cause I thought Canelo had slipped. With modern conditioning methods, I didn't think moving up in weight was very significant. At 147, Crawford isn't beating Leonard or Hearns, imo. And that's just to name a couple of welters I think are better than Bud. Crawford is a great fighter but not somebody who I'd argue in the best ever in any of the weight classes he's fought in- not by a mile.
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He's the best Lightweight that ever won a Championship at Super Middleweight that's for goddamn sure 
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16897
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Hey every discussion ain't about elmer and his feelings 
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16897
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15709
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
I don't put feelings in it. I call it what I see it. Then, the one that debates me, gets personal and then they flipped it as me as the one that started the argument.
I don't think that Terence "Bud" Crawford was better than Muhammad Ali nor Roberto Duran. The two truest greatest boxers of the last 60 years.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5713
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Crawford is great
He hasnt fought often or against great opposition
I wouldnt put him that high
He hasnt fought often or against great opposition
I wouldnt put him that high
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Almost no boxer can compete with the achievements of the Robinson's and the Greb's of the world as far as achievements and frankly no boxer should ever try because as we saw there were horrific long term repercussions to fighting that many fights.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025, 22:49 Crawford is great
He hasnt fought often or against great opposition
I wouldnt put him that high
But in terms of any boxer in the modern era. Say 1965 or so to now Crawford's achievements stack up well against anyone honestly. Most fighters have a lot of fights, but ultimately only a handful of truly big ones.
When we say he hasn't fought many fights. I mean yeah that's true, but who does in the modern era?
Sugar Ray Leonard fought less fights than Crawford and when he was younger than Crawford is now he couldn't whip Terry Norris.
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He's a true great. Top 10 of my lifetime would be my guess.
-
Riddick Bowie
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 947
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Settle down people. He beat Canelo, a man who has been outboxed before and who has often enjoyed very favourable judging. A good win for sure, but not one that earns you all time great status.
After Canelo, Bud's opponents are not so much a Who's Who of boxing but a Who's Not. Khan, Brook, Errol Spence? Come on. The issue with grading modern boxers is that belts are plentiful, the talent pool is shallow, and everything they do is hyped to death.
After Canelo, Bud's opponents are not so much a Who's Who of boxing but a Who's Not. Khan, Brook, Errol Spence? Come on. The issue with grading modern boxers is that belts are plentiful, the talent pool is shallow, and everything they do is hyped to death.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5713
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Look at hopkins resume compared to crawfords. There is just no comparison - crawfords best 3 wins are errol spence, canelo and shawn porter. For years his beat win was gamboa. He languished in no mans land with bob arum for years fighting joke oppositiongilgamesh wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025, 23:11Almost no boxer can compete with the achievements of the Robinson's and the Greb's of the world as far as achievements and frankly no boxer should ever try because as we saw there were horrific long term repercussions to fighting that many fights.Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑15 Sep 2025, 22:49 Crawford is great
He hasnt fought often or against great opposition
I wouldnt put him that high
But in terms of any boxer in the modern era. Say 1965 or so to now Crawford's achievements stack up well against anyone honestly. Most fighters have a lot of fights, but ultimately only a handful of truly big ones.
When we say he hasn't fought many fights. I mean yeah that's true, but who does in the modern era?
Sugar Ray Leonard fought less fights than Crawford and when he was younger than Crawford is now he couldn't whip Terry Norris.
To me hes like andre ward. All time great fighter who has a thin resume
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He's pretty well ahead of Ward. Hopkins has a lot of good wins, but he doesn't have any 1 win as big as the Canelo victory i don't think. He does have more names overall on his record.
Ward's best win on his record is a decision he didn't deserve against Kovalev and a TKO he achieved with low blows in the rematch.
It does hurt Crawford that some of the guys he beat for titles are literally known only for losing to him. Like Viktor Postol or Julius Indongo. I don't remember any fight those guys ever had after Crawford.
Ward's best win on his record is a decision he didn't deserve against Kovalev and a TKO he achieved with low blows in the rematch.
It does hurt Crawford that some of the guys he beat for titles are literally known only for losing to him. Like Viktor Postol or Julius Indongo. I don't remember any fight those guys ever had after Crawford.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15709
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Riddick Bowie wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 06:36 Settle down people. He beat Canelo, a man who has been outboxed before and who has often enjoyed very favourable judging. A good win for sure, but not one that earns you all time great status.
After Canelo, Bud's opponents are not so much a Who's Who of boxing but a Who's Not. Khan, Brook, Errol Spence? Come on. The issue with grading modern boxers is that belts are plentiful, the talent pool is shallow, and everything they do is hyped to death.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15709
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
Terence "Bud" Crawford is better than Bernard Hopkins at least.gilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 12:11 He's pretty well ahead of Ward. Hopkins has a lot of good wins, but he doesn't have any 1 win as big as the Canelo victory i don't think. He does have more names overall on his record.
Ward's best win on his record is a decision he didn't deserve against Kovalev and a TKO he achieved with low blows in the rematch.
It does hurt Crawford that some of the guys he beat for titles are literally known only for losing to him. Like Viktor Postol or Julius Indongo. I don't remember any fight those guys ever had after Crawford.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5713
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He kicked the shit out of chad dawson and carl froch, kessler and abrahamgilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 12:11 He's pretty well ahead of Ward. Hopkins has a lot of good wins, but he doesn't have any 1 win as big as the Canelo victory i don't think. He does have more names overall on his record.
Ward's best win on his record is a decision he didn't deserve against Kovalev and a TKO he achieved with low blows in the rematch.
It does hurt Crawford that some of the guys he beat for titles are literally known only for losing to him. Like Viktor Postol or Julius Indongo. I don't remember any fight those guys ever had after Crawford.
Thats as good as Crawford
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
More to the point, are you going to rank him in your Top 100?elmersalsa wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 10:32 If you are about to rank Bud Crawford in the top 100 pound per pound all-time boxers list, where would you rank him now, at this moment?
He has been undisputed champion in 3 weight classes. He is undefeated at 38 years old.
Is there any more mountains for Bud to climb?
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15709
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Terence "Bud" Crawford: Where Do You Rank Him Now?
He has not retired yet. But, he got the credentials right now.nickcat0 wrote: ↑11 Oct 2025, 17:51More to the point, are you going to rank him in your Top 100?elmersalsa wrote: ↑14 Sep 2025, 10:32 If you are about to rank Bud Crawford in the top 100 pound per pound all-time boxers list, where would you rank him now, at this moment?
He has been undisputed champion in 3 weight classes. He is undefeated at 38 years old.
Is there any more mountains for Bud to climb?