Terence Crawford vs James Toney
Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 01:09
Crawford of the Canelo bout
against
Toney of the Barkley bout,
who wins?
against
Toney of the Barkley bout,
who wins?
Toney was a terrific inside fighter. He was one of the top 10 most complete boxers of the last 60 years.2128778 wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 06:39 I'd lean towards Toney.
After you created a thread, I actually went back and rewatched Toney-Barkley. That was, perhaps, Toney's best career performance. I honestly think, that this version of Toney could've stopped Canelo from past Saturday.
Comparing Crawford's inside work against Canelo with Toney's inside work against Barkley - Toney seems to have faster hands and his combos looked more lethal (with more power) than Crawford's.
Now, it would be fair to note the style thing. Crawford, of course, would be giving Toney more movement and angles. But it's unlikely, that Terence would've controlled the range. Toney would be the taller and longer fighter here.
Given both fighter's characters, we'd see them duking it out on the inside. Given my above notes, I think Toney would be having an upper hand in trenches.
I'd make Toney the favourite in this match-up.
Roy Jones, Jr was an exception. He wasn't human. He was from another planet back in 1994 when he whupped James "Lights Out" Toney.
(in my voice of Roy Jones): "Yes, he was".elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 18:07Toney was a terrific inside fighter. He was one of the top 10 most complete boxers of the last 60 years.2128778 wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 06:39 I'd lean towards Toney.
After you created a thread, I actually went back and rewatched Toney-Barkley. That was, perhaps, Toney's best career performance. I honestly think, that this version of Toney could've stopped Canelo from past Saturday.
Comparing Crawford's inside work against Canelo with Toney's inside work against Barkley - Toney seems to have faster hands and his combos looked more lethal (with more power) than Crawford's.
Now, it would be fair to note the style thing. Crawford, of course, would be giving Toney more movement and angles. But it's unlikely, that Terence would've controlled the range. Toney would be the taller and longer fighter here.
Given both fighter's characters, we'd see them duking it out on the inside. Given my above notes, I think Toney would be having an upper hand in trenches.
I'd make Toney the favourite in this match-up.
I can see Crawford being able to frustrate Toney. Toney could be frustrated by movers and/or volume punchers. And especially, when Toney wasn't fully up for the fight.
I agree with you. James "Lights Out" Toney was a terrific fighter. He just had some lackadaisical moments when he didn't take training very seriously. But, he was a great fighter with warrior's mentality that fought anybody, any place and at any time.
Who did Toney beat at 168 that makes you think he would beat an elite fighter?elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 18:04 James "Lights Out" Toney. When in great shape, he was in a different class. A complete fighter. Toney by decision.
His performance against Iran "The Blade" Barkley was enough to consider him one of boxing's greatest technicians. Lights Out was a complete fighter. One of the most complete boxers that I have ever seen.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 08:25Who did Toney beat at 168 that makes you think he would beat an elite fighter?elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 18:04 James "Lights Out" Toney. When in great shape, he was in a different class. A complete fighter. Toney by decision.
But Nigel Benn had already beaten the nearly blind Barkley in less than three minutes. Are you saying Barkley was an elite fighter at 168?elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 17:56His performance against Iran "The Blade" Barkley was enough to consider him one of boxing's greatest technicians. Lights Out was a complete fighter. One of the most complete boxers that I have ever seen.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 08:25Who did Toney beat at 168 that makes you think he would beat an elite fighter?elmersalsa wrote: ↑16 Sep 2025, 18:04 James "Lights Out" Toney. When in great shape, he was in a different class. A complete fighter. Toney by decision.
Yes. He became a triple crown champion at that. Iran "The Blade" Barkley should be in the hall of fame. If overrated Barry McGuigan is in, then Barkley and others should be in.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:09But Nigel Benn had already beaten the nearly blind Barkley in less than three minutes. Are you saying Barkley was an elite fighter at 168?elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 17:56His performance against Iran "The Blade" Barkley was enough to consider him one of boxing's greatest technicians. Lights Out was a complete fighter. One of the most complete boxers that I have ever seen.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 08:25
Who did Toney beat at 168 that makes you think he would beat an elite fighter?
elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:40Yes. He became a triple crown champion at that. Iran "The Blade" Barkley should be in the hall of fame. If overrated Barry McGuigan is in, then Barkley and others should be in.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:09But Nigel Benn had already beaten the nearly blind Barkley in less than three minutes. Are you saying Barkley was an elite fighter at 168?elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 17:56
His performance against Iran "The Blade" Barkley was enough to consider him one of boxing's greatest technicians. Lights Out was a complete fighter. One of the most complete boxers that I have ever seen.
Barry McGuigan was overrated.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 07:48elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:40Yes. He became a triple crown champion at that. Iran "The Blade" Barkley should be in the hall of fame. If overrated Barry McGuigan is in, then Barkley and others should be in.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:09
But Nigel Benn had already beaten the nearly blind Barkley in less than three minutes. Are you saying Barkley was an elite fighter at 168?![]()
You're the only one talking about Barry McGuigan.elmersalsa wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 10:27Barry McGuigan was overrated.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 07:48elmersalsa wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025, 19:40
Yes. He became a triple crown champion at that. Iran "The Blade" Barkley should be in the hall of fame. If overrated Barry McGuigan is in, then Barkley and others should be in.![]()
He was overrated. What else do you want me to say?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 14:29You're the only one talking about Barry McGuigan.
I want you to say which elite boxer James Toney beat at 168? Please don't say Iran Barkley, because when you do, it makes you sound as thick as mince.elmersalsa wrote: ↑24 Sep 2025, 10:57He was overrated. What else do you want me to say?
And why Iran Barkley wasn't elite? He was the champion when James Toney beat him, right?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑24 Sep 2025, 11:02I want you to say which elite boxer James Toney beat at 168? Please don't say Iran Barkley, because when you do, it makes you sound as thick as mince.