BoxRec

prime for prime who wins?

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:prime for prime who wins?

Absolutely no idea, Brocky. Not my era, at all. I did once see a photo of Peter Jackson though and he looked a fine figure of a man, if that helps.

Anyway, I dropped in to ask you to clean up the heading. It's a fekkin disgrace - Peter Jackson vs Jogn L sullivan. Yes, we all know who you mean by your "Jogn L sullivan" but it's offensive to my keen eye. You know what I mean. Don't let your standards drop. When you are writing for a big city newspaper you'll look back and remember me and my sound advice.

Oh, and the one about training Marciano seems to be missing the key word.

i would like to change it, but I can only edit the post, not the thread. perhaps a moderator could do it for me. I didnt even realize i hit the "g" key instead of the "h" key which was right next to it until too late!

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:i would like to change it, but I can only edit the post, not the thread. perhaps a moderator could do it for me. I didnt even realize i hit the "g" key instead of the "h" key which was right next to it until too late!

Edit the first comment on the thread you wrote and edit the subject. It should change the thread title as well, I believe.

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:prime for prime who wins?

From all the research I've done(and I've done quite a bit)Sullivan wins by KO. Jackson was a clever boxer, but not elusive in the Corbett/Mitchell class. He liked to mix it up. NOT a good strategy against a man like Sullivan, who had a cannon for a right hand.

BTW, I wouldn't even make Corbett a favorite over a PRIME John L.