Tony Sibson & Chris Pyatt

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 31 Jan 2006, 11:36

I know this may be more suited to The Boxers Of The Past Forum but I thought I would get more response & feedback here.

I hope nobody minds?

Anyway as Leicester is my new(ish) hometown I was wondering who do you guys rate as the better fighter Tony Sibson or Chris Pyatt?

Also in a mythical match-up at Middleweight who do you think would have won?

Tony Sibson
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=000588

Chris Pyatt
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=000647

Over 12 rounds, who's the King Of Leicester?

Old bones Ian · Post by **Old bones Ian** » 31 Jan 2006, 12:14

Pyatt was better as a Light-Middle, so you'd probably have to side for Sibson to be to strong for Pyatt at Middle.

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 31 Jan 2006, 13:00

Sibbo would have been too strong for Pyatt... interesting fight though!...

Greg Nicholas · Post by **Greg Nicholas** » 31 Jan 2006, 15:12

I watched Pyatt sparring with Chris Eubank for Eubank's fight with Jarvis, it was a public training session in Manchester. Pyatt actually looked way out of his depth, Eubank beat him up! Ronnie Davies had to tell Eubank to calm down.

john2345 · Post by **john2345** » 01 Feb 2006, 06:10

Sibson was a far better all round fighter than Pyatt. He was more consistent, a better puncher, stronger/rougher and in my view a heavier hitter. Pyatt wasn't bad, but to my mind he didn't show his best over a long enough period.

If they had fought i'd have gone for Sibson.

J

Slapsie Maxie · Post by **Slapsie Maxie** » 01 Feb 2006, 06:20

I would have to go with Sibson too.

Both got caught out when they stepped up in class. But, Sibson's step ups were against people like Hagler whereas Pyatt's were against people like Rossi.

I liked Pyatt a lot but I think this would be a mid/late round stoppage

Slapsie

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 01 Feb 2006, 07:07

Pyatt was much better at 154 than he was at 160 I think... he seemed to have a lot of talent when he won the british 154 title but then went off the rails a bit and through he came back later I don't think he really lived up to his earlier potential....

boxingchat · Post by **boxingchat** » 01 Feb 2006, 10:04

Greg Nicholas wrote:I watched Pyatt sparring with Chris Eubank for Eubank's fight with Jarvis, it was a public training session in Manchester. Pyatt actually looked way out of his depth, Eubank beat him up! Ronnie Davies had to tell Eubank to calm down.

Ahh, your memory is good but Pyatt floor Eubank twice in private!

Pyatt was a very, very good fighter.

Remember when Eubank used him for sparring he was a world champion in his own right.

realboy · Post by **realboy** » 01 Feb 2006, 10:30

Sibson woulda won this one, too strong,Pyatt better at light middle.
Collins walked right through him

KO Artist · Post by **KO Artist** » 01 Feb 2006, 13:59

Terrific fighter, Chris, and lovely bloke too.

Tony is a great fella as well, but a better fighter than Pyatt. Stronger and a harder puncher too.

at 160 Sibson would stop him in rounds 3 - 6

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 01 Feb 2006, 14:49

boxingchat wrote:
Greg Nicholas wrote:I watched Pyatt sparring with Chris Eubank for Eubank's fight with Jarvis, it was a public training session in Manchester. Pyatt actually looked way out of his depth, Eubank beat him up! Ronnie Davies had to tell Eubank to calm down.
Ahh, your memory is good but Pyatt floor Eubank twice in private!

Pyatt was a very, very good fighter.

Remember when Eubank used him for sparring he was a world champion in his own right.

If memory serves me correctly, wasn't Pyatt a little mechanical? remember him being very powerful with a very good output, but a little bit predictable.

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 01 Feb 2006, 16:48

Sibson for sure, but Pyatt was a Light Middle and Sibson a very big middleweight. In this day of fragmented titles Sibson would have been a 'big 4' world champion no doubt about it.

Manos de Oro · Post by **Manos de Oro** » 01 Feb 2006, 18:46

Yeah, Sibson would be too strong. Their styles would meld for an intense war, but I'll go with Pyatt (at his best) getting stopped between 9-12 (even if it were set for 15).

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 02 Feb 2006, 13:26

Sibbo rules Leicester then.

I have to admit I also agree with most the points here that the nautrally bigger and stronger Sibson would win this one, by points or late stoppage to my mind, in a bruising, intense fight.

Also it would have been interesting to have seen how the Super-Middleweight division would have suited Sibson.

chris s · Post by **chris s** » 02 Feb 2006, 13:27

Both tremendous fellas, but Sibbo would be too big, too strong. Just like Steve Collins was for 'Bo'

Gary_V · Post by **Gary_V** » 02 Feb 2006, 15:21

Greg Nicholas wrote:I watched Pyatt sparring with Chris Eubank for Eubank's fight with Jarvis, it was a public training session in Manchester. Pyatt actually looked way out of his depth, Eubank beat him up! Ronnie Davies had to tell Eubank to calm down.

There's been talk that on other occasions, Chris Pyatt had the upper hand in sparring...

Gary_V · Post by **Gary_V** » 02 Feb 2006, 15:28

Both were brilliant boxers, no doubt about it.

Both, particularly Pyatt, don't get the dues they deserve.

Pyatt won British, Commonwealth, European and a WBO title and is 5 losses are not very revealing (1 was a cut, 1 was a UD in Italy, UD to skilled John Jackson, a premature stoppage against Collins and a UD at the close of his career to Foster).

Chris Pyatt is naturally a light-middle and was very small for a middleweight - he bulked-up a lot at that weight and was quite muscular, but perhaps not as sharp as at 154.

Sibson is another great Leices. boxer who let's not forget took on Hagler.

I'm not sure about the outcome of this one. Pyatt would be a lot smaller but always had a good chin and good power on him.

Possibly a UD....either way?

KOJOE90 · Post by **KOJOE90** » 03 Feb 2006, 15:46

Gary_V wrote:Sibson is another great Leices. boxer who let's not forget took on Hagler.

Didn't Sibson once say "Hagler was the one guy I didn't mind losing to as I was facing a man who was a master of his art"?

Or words to that effect.