Great match ups on paper

Trent · Post by **Trent** » 18 Feb 2006, 09:02

In history of the sport, what were some of the greatest matchups on paper that didnt live up to its true potential.. id have to say Oscar vs tito, on paper it was the 2 best in the diviision that everyone wanted to see... but the fight was boring with oscar running around and not much action...

Any other fights you can thik of that didnt live up to the hype?

theone · Post by **theone** » 18 Feb 2006, 09:30

For all its significance and impact, i believe Hagler vs Leonard fell well below expectations. After the sensational first fight, Ali vs Frazier 2 was kinda dull.

DoubleM · Post by **DoubleM** » 18 Feb 2006, 10:42

Louis-Conn II.

ferocity · Post by **ferocity** » 19 Feb 2006, 01:42

Trent wrote:In history of the sport, what were some of the greatest matchups on paper that didnt live up to its true potential.. id have to say Oscar vs tito, on paper it was the 2 best in the diviision that everyone wanted to see... but the fight was boring with oscar running around and not much action...

Any other fights you can thik of that didnt live up to the hype?

For other boxers is called boxing, in Delahoyas position is called running?

Great match ups on paper

Great match ups on paper

Re: Great match ups on paper