Arum exposes yet another Hatton lie

boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Arum exposes yet another Hatton lie

Post by boxingchat »

"We have loads of offers from all the leading Promoters in the US"

"We're negotiating with the likes of Mayweather, Cotto, Gatti
"

"Both the major networks want Ricky and a bidding war is ensuing"


RAY HATTON - August, October and November 2005.

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


LAS VEGAS REVEIW JOURNAL - 20th February 2006

Top Rank exclusively promotes Mayweather, Castillo and Cotto, all of whom have been mentioned as Hatton opponents. Arum [i](FACT: Leading promoter)[/i] said Hatton, who is being courted by HBO [b](FACT: Showtime have not shown any interest whatsoever) [/b], "doesn't want those names yet"

Arum said he expects Castillo to fight Cotto later this year after Castillo gets through his June 3 bout with Las Vegan Diego Corrales.

"Ricky Hatton is not going to fight a real opponent until he drains all the money out fighting secondary guys, in my opinion" Arum said. "That's why we decided not to go after him"

: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Seems like Ray has been caught telling lies once again!

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
lvlarc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1871
Joined: 16 Jan 2005, 02:24

Post by lvlarc »

I read the topic then seen your name as author, what a suprise!
boxingchat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1934
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 05:26

Post by boxingchat »

Let the facts speak for themselves :TU:
Achybreaky
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:54

Post by Achybreaky »

If you think anything arum says are facts then you are one delusional puppy :TU:
Coconut
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 969
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 11:53

Post by Coconut »

WOW!

Miguel Cotto's promoter says that at some unspecified date and time they made a decision not to negotiate with Hatton any more.


Miguel Cotto's promoter categorically does not say that there were no negotiations between the two camps.


Miguel Cotto's promoter seeks to promote his guy over another fighter.


It's 'hold the back page stuff' for sure...





Mate, this is weak, even by your standards

And using a 'FACT' to rubbish another claim is just preposterous.
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Re: Arum exposes yet another Hatton lie

Post by KO Artist »

boxingchat wrote:"We have loads of offers from all the leading Promoters in the US"

"We're negotiating with the likes of Mayweather, Cotto, Gatti
"

"Both the major networks want Ricky and a bidding war is ensuing"


RAY HATTON - August, October and November 2005.

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


LAS VEGAS REVEIW JOURNAL - 20th February 2006

Top Rank exclusively promotes Mayweather, Castillo and Cotto, all of whom have been mentioned as Hatton opponents. Arum [i](FACT: Leading promoter)[/i] said Hatton, who is being courted by HBO [b](FACT: Showtime have not shown any interest whatsoever) [/b], "doesn't want those names yet"

Arum said he expects Castillo to fight Cotto later this year after Castillo gets through his June 3 bout with Las Vegan Diego Corrales.

"Ricky Hatton is not going to fight a real opponent until he drains all the money out fighting secondary guys, in my opinion" Arum said. "That's why we decided not to go after him"

: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Seems like Ray has been caught telling lies once again!

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Get a life , Bell End.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Bob Arum: "Yesterday I was lying. Today I am telling the truth."

Sounds like Ray is getting the hang of this boxing business.
REAL_DEAL
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5027
Joined: 09 Jul 2003, 06:42

Post by REAL_DEAL »

lirva33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by lirva33 »

great post boxingchat, but don't expect the hatton nuthuggers here to open their little beady eyes to even a treacle of criticism

well spotted mate

:TU:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Arum exposes yet another Hatton lie

Post by Chambers2 »

boxingchat wrote:"We have loads of offers from all the leading Promoters in the US"

"We're negotiating with the likes of Mayweather, Cotto, Gatti
"

"Both the major networks want Ricky and a bidding war is ensuing"


RAY HATTON - August, October and November 2005.

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:


LAS VEGAS REVEIW JOURNAL - 20th February 2006

Top Rank exclusively promotes Mayweather, Castillo and Cotto, all of whom have been mentioned as Hatton opponents. Arum [i](FACT: Leading promoter)[/i] said Hatton, who is being courted by HBO [b](FACT: Showtime have not shown any interest whatsoever) [/b], "doesn't want those names yet"

Arum said he expects Castillo to fight Cotto later this year after Castillo gets through his June 3 bout with Las Vegan Diego Corrales.

"Ricky Hatton is not going to fight a real opponent until he drains all the money out fighting secondary guys, in my opinion" Arum said. "That's why we decided not to go after him"

: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Seems like Ray has been caught telling lies once again!

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
I'd get counselling if I was you, Hattons departure from SN has obviously left you with a number of deep-rooted unresolved issues.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Bob Arum is the biggest bullshit artist and flimflam man in boxing, he could't walk a straight line if he was on a tightrope with a 5000 foot drop on either side.

If Arum told me there was a heatwave I'd go buy snowshoes.
Neri
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2856
Joined: 01 May 2003, 00:41

Post by Neri »

lirva33 wrote:great post boxingchat, but don't expect the hatton nuthuggers here to open their little beady eyes to even a treacle of criticism

well spotted mate

:TU:
You paid that bet yet ?
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Post by KO Artist »

MightyWarrior wrote:Bob Arum: "Yesterday I was lying. Today I am telling the truth."

Sounds like Ray is getting the hang of this boxing business.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

He's like an old hand isnt he.
MPG
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 642
Joined: 14 Aug 2005, 17:06

Post by MPG »

Why is everybody knocking Hatton,he is the best boxer we have at the moment and proudly flying the flag for britain.

He is WORLD champion and you get some dumb fucks still trying to knock him,there's a tread in the current sceen and the americans are knocking him aswell,BUT i have told them where to go LOL.

WE SHOULD BACK RICKY HATTON,NOT KNOCK HIM.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Really chat you need to find a new hobby, doesnt Frank have anything better for you to do???.... I'm no die hard Hatton fan, but even I find your constant snipes against Ricky rather boring. :x ..
Also as someone who works for a man who is almost pathologically suspicious of boxing forums such as this, it is rather laughable that you should use this forum as a platform to peddle your anti Hatton propaganda!.... :box: :box: :box:
I'm sure there are plenty of SN fighters who would prefer 10% of the attention that your boss is still giving wicky!!!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :roll:
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

silkov wrote:Really chat you need to find a new hobby, doesnt Frank have anything better for you to do???.... I'm no die hard Hatton fan, but even I find your constant snipes against Ricky rather boring. :x ..
Also as someone who works for a man who is almost pathologically suspicious of boxing forums such as this, it is rather laughable that you should use this forum as a platform to peddle your anti Hatton propaganda!.... :box: :box: :box:
I'm sure there are plenty of SN fighters who would prefer 10% of the attention that your boss is still giving wicky!!!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :roll:
Yes laughable that FW throws his toys out of the pram as soon as he sees anything derogatory about him on these boards (lets be honest there is plenty of ammo) yet he is happy for his lackeys to post their anti Hatton bile all over the place. What a nob.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

silkov wrote:I'm sure there are plenty of SN fighters who would prefer 10% of the attention that your boss is still giving wicky!!!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :roll:
Exactly - why don't they try building up decent fighters on their books other than Khan and Hatton. If they'd done a good promotional job on Witter - ie got him a fight with Mitchell/Harris/Cotto they'd have a belt holder at the same weight who'd make a load of money for them.

For all the talk of number 1 in Europe, he'd be allot bigger if he hadn't neglected some of the prospects that he has in the past.

Hatton leaving SN wouldn't have hit them as hard if they didnt put all their eggs in 1 basket
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

Yes, Fwranks not half the promoter he seems to think he is, he only seems able to really concentrate fully on one fighter... first it was Naz, then Hatton now Khan... why are so many of his fighters forgotten men???.... his handling of Witter has been nothing short of a disgrace... Witter has spent his peak years chasing Hatton and trying to get meaningful fights... and this while he is connected to the so called number 1 promoter!!!... :box:
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Post by KO Artist »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
silkov wrote:I'm sure there are plenty of SN fighters who would prefer 10% of the attention that your boss is still giving wicky!!!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :roll:
Exactly - why don't they try building up decent fighters on their books other than Khan and Hatton. If they'd done a good promotional job on Witter - ie got him a fight with Mitchell/Harris/Cotto they'd have a belt holder at the same weight who'd make a load of money for them.

For all the talk of number 1 in Europe, he'd be allot bigger if he hadn't neglected some of the prospects that he has in the past.

Hatton leaving SN wouldn't have hit them as hard if they didnt put all their eggs in 1 basket
They never felt Witter was worth investing in, becuase he cant sell tickets.

I dont blame them either. Witter is very poor Box - Office wise.
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

KO Atrist wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
silkov wrote:I'm sure there are plenty of SN fighters who would prefer 10% of the attention that your boss is still giving wicky!!!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :roll:
Exactly - why don't they try building up decent fighters on their books other than Khan and Hatton. If they'd done a good promotional job on Witter - ie got him a fight with Mitchell/Harris/Cotto they'd have a belt holder at the same weight who'd make a load of money for them.

For all the talk of number 1 in Europe, he'd be allot bigger if he hadn't neglected some of the prospects that he has in the past.

Hatton leaving SN wouldn't have hit them as hard if they didnt put all their eggs in 1 basket
They never felt Witter was worth investing in, becuase he cant sell tickets.

I dont blame them either. Witter is very poor Box - Office wise.
Well I know a lot of Witter fans and had he got the fights then the crowds would have come in... also, surely it is the job of a promoter to make his fighter good box office... after all he's supposed to be promoting that fighter isn't he?.... if a boxer is bad box office then it is at least partially down to the promoter!...
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

silkov wrote:
Well I know a lot of Witter fans and had he got the fights then the crowds would have come in
How many Witter fans do you actualy know? Two or three hundred, or two or three? :D
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45231
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

silkov wrote:
KO Atrist wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote: Exactly - why don't they try building up decent fighters on their books other than Khan and Hatton. If they'd done a good promotional job on Witter - ie got him a fight with Mitchell/Harris/Cotto they'd have a belt holder at the same weight who'd make a load of money for them.

For all the talk of number 1 in Europe, he'd be allot bigger if he hadn't neglected some of the prospects that he has in the past.

Hatton leaving SN wouldn't have hit them as hard if they didnt put all their eggs in 1 basket
Not true really. It's also part of a fighter's job to aid their promoter in making themselves marketable. For whatever reason, and I have never quite put my finger on it, the public have never seemed to warm to Witter. Look at how few times he's fought on his home turf....

They never felt Witter was worth investing in, becuase he cant sell tickets.

I dont blame them either. Witter is very poor Box - Office wise.
Well I know a lot of Witter fans and had he got the fights then the crowds would have come in... also, surely it is the job of a promoter to make his fighter good box office... after all he's supposed to be promoting that fighter isn't he?.... if a boxer is bad box office then it is at least partially down to the promoter!...
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Post by silkov »

MightyWarrior wrote:
silkov wrote:
Well I know a lot of Witter fans and had he got the fights then the crowds would have come in
How many Witter fans do you actualy know? Two or three hundred, or two or three? :D
I havent seen Witter fighting to too many empty houses... if he is so bad why has Hatton spent the best part of his career running away from him?. I'm sure one of the main reasons Warren 'promoted' Witter was to keep him and Hatton apart...
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

I agree Warren didn't want his main ticket seller in with a loose cannon like Witter - too much risk for zero reward.

be interesting to hear Warren's take on it now - I asked him once on a conf call and he went through the roof.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
silkov wrote:
KO Atrist wrote: Not true really. It's also part of a fighter's job to aid their promoter in making themselves marketable. For whatever reason, and I have never quite put my finger on it, the public have never seemed to warm to Witter. Look at how few times he's fought on his home turf....

They never felt Witter was worth investing in, becuase he cant sell tickets.

I dont blame them either. Witter is very poor Box - Office wise.
Well I know a lot of Witter fans and had he got the fights then the crowds would have come in... also, surely it is the job of a promoter to make his fighter good box office... after all he's supposed to be promoting that fighter isn't he?.... if a boxer is bad box office then it is at least partially down to the promoter!...
Surely its the promoters job to promote and the boxers job to box - Witter is exciting in the ring. Hes been awfully promoted though. If a promoter cant promote a fighter hes really a fight organiser instead of a promoter.

James did you just reply inside the quote? Get with the programme.
Post Reply