Who was the harder hitter? who was the greater puncher?

Post Reply
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Who was the harder hitter? who was the greater puncher?

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

ken norton or jersey joe walcott?
Last edited by BrocktonBlockbuster49 on 15 Apr 2006, 14:40, edited 1 time in total.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

woah good question.....i'm heading for my film library. First gut instinct is Walcott.
KO Artist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1835
Joined: 10 May 2005, 17:21

Re: Who was the harder hitter?

Post by KO Artist »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:ken norton or jersey joe walcott?
Id say Jersey Joe. Real big puncher great left hook. A harder one shot hitter than Norton whose power was a bit overrated.

Id say Walcott was the better fighter period.
Expug
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4453
Joined: 27 Dec 2005, 18:40

Post by Expug »

Walcots left hook stands out a little more than any of Nortons stuff. Gotta go with Jersey Joe.
zojo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 951
Joined: 29 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by zojo »

Norton is a great example of a guy who is very muscular (the guy was ripped even by today's gym-rat standards), but who lacked pop.

Was it all muscluar endourance or was he strong as well?

PS. Walcott was very muscular for his times as well.

Does anyone know what their training regimine consisted of?
bollox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2168
Joined: 12 Jan 2003, 07:41

Post by bollox »

Kenny didn't look too strong against Foreman :-?

The only fighter of recent times that comes to mind as having benefitted longterm from building muscle mass and not hindering himself was Holyfield in his rise to HW
theone
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1655
Joined: 13 Sep 2005, 17:12

Post by theone »

For the record, Norton never lifted weights. Nortons physique was a product of genetics and vigorous calistethenics.
Post Reply