Bob Satterfield vs Micheal Moorer. What If?
Bob Satterfield vs Micheal Moorer. What If?
At Light-Heavyweight or Heavyweight who wins out of these two big hitters? 
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.
Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooperevndrbsn wrote:Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.
I'm talking about what the fight would look like. Both fighters hitting the canvas, wild slugging match. You know, one that involved one of the participants in this fantasy match up ...BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooperevndrbsn wrote:Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Yes he did, although I think Cooper had a slightly better chin. Satterfield-Cooper would have been entertaining as well.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooperevndrbsn wrote:Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.
So Brocky, how would you see Satterfield-Moorer?
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56