BoxRec

At Light-Heavyweight or Heavyweight who wins out of these two big hitters?

This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.

The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.

Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.

evndrbsn wrote:

The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.

Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.

except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooper

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

evndrbsn wrote:

The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.

Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.

except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooper

I'm talking about what the fight would look like. Both fighters hitting the canvas, wild slugging match. You know, one that involved one of the participants in this fantasy match up ...

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:

evndrbsn wrote:

The Great John L wrote:This is an interesting matchup. Neither had a very good chin, although I think Moorer’s was probably a bit better. And while I think Satterfield was the harder puncher, Moorer had slightly better boxing skills and a big advantage with his southpaw style. Satterfield could probably KO anyone that he caught cleanly, but I’d give a slight edge to Moorer and say he wins by mid round KO after a wild fight with both fighters hitting the deck.

Great analysis. Bert Cooper-Michael Moorer revisited.

except satterfield was faster and had better boxing skills than bert cooper

Yes he did, although I think Cooper had a slightly better chin. Satterfield-Cooper would have been entertaining as well.

So Brocky, how would you see Satterfield-Moorer?

At Lightheavyweight,I say Moorer by K.O within 6.

Wow, what a fight while it lasts. Satterfield, with his explosive start, has a real chance to finish what Bert Cooper started. But if the fight gets to round 3, I favor Moorer, the southpaw slugger with better skills and better whiskers.