Who cares about Vitali Klitschko?

evndrbsn · Post by **evndrbsn** » 15 Sep 2006, 13:07

Given the recent and unhealthy string of Vitali Klitschko threads, I decided to jump on the bandwagon and take it for a spin. I've never been sold on Vitali since he showed against Chris Byrd he had less natural heart than the Tin Man.

However ... there has been a Rob Calloway-esque support of him on the boards in the past week or so that has been sickening me as a boxing fan. So that raises the question, who cares about Vitali Klitschko?

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 15 Sep 2006, 16:07

Decagon cares. Deeply.

evndrbsn · Post by **evndrbsn** » 15 Sep 2006, 16:22

pundit wrote:Decagon cares. Deeply.

Pundit, were you torn between the top two choices?

evndrbsn · Post by **evndrbsn** » 18 Sep 2006, 14:07

After a three day run at the polls, the early results are in:

Six people, or a cool 75%, could care less about Klitschko, with one so utterly upset with his lack of greatness that he/she has threatened to take his/her own life if a new Vitali thread is created.

Two people, a pathetically low 25%, found Klitschko to be a good boxer and one hell of a model citizen. Naturally, those people are pundit and Silkov. How fitting that there were only two Klitschko nuthuggers, one for each hairy ball sack

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 18 Sep 2006, 14:30

evndrbsn wrote:After a three day run at the polls, the early results are in:

Six people, or a cool 75%, could care less about Klitschko, with one so utterly upset with his lack of greatness that he/she has threatened to take his/her own life if a new Vitali thread is created.

Two people, a pathetically low 25%, found Klitschko to be a good boxer and one hell of a model citizen. Naturally, those people are pundit and Silkov. How fitting that there were only two Klitschko nuthuggers, one for each hairy ball sack

I'd say particpation in your poll is rather low to allow inferences....

Perhaps there is a certain Vitali-fatigue. After all, it's practically undisputed that he was clearly the world's #1 heavyewight in 2004/05 -- so what is there really to discuss.

Cheers,

P

PS: Vlad - Briggs KO 10 secs

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 18 Sep 2006, 17:41

Decagon wrote:Actually, another poll showed that if Bitschko had fought Rahman in the injured state he was in for the year 2005, he would have lost. That shows a contradiction, which proves that all polls are meaningless.

Yes yes and now we take our lithium pills as every night.

TerribleTim2 · Post by **TerribleTim2** » 18 Sep 2006, 19:02

Lousy choices

evndrbsn · Post by **evndrbsn** » 19 Sep 2006, 21:38

TerribleTim2 wrote:Lousy choices

Lousy heavyweight, what do you expect?

pundit · Post by **pundit** » 19 Sep 2006, 21:40

evndrbsn wrote:
TerribleTim2 wrote:Lousy choices
Lousy heavyweight, what do you expect?

Better choices.

Aldo Pravisani · Post by **Aldo Pravisani** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:07

Vitali who? Ah yes, once I had some of it at a Japanese restaurant. It was not very tasty for mine.

Aldo Pravisani · Post by **Aldo Pravisani** » 19 Sep 2006, 23:09

Decagon wrote:
pundit wrote:
Decagon wrote:Actually, another poll showed that if Bitschko had fought Rahman in the injured state he was in for the year 2005, he would have lost. That shows a contradiction, which proves that all polls are meaningless.
Yes yes and now we take our lithium pills as every night.
You got a mouse in your pocket or something?

He's only happy to see you

!