Page 1 of 2

BEST WELTERWEIGHTS PAST AND PRESENT

Posted: 07 Feb 2007, 23:57
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
MAURICE BLOCKER
RAY LEONARD
MARVIN HAGLER
RAY ROBINSON
ARON PRYOR
TERRY NORRIS
MILDRICK TAYLOR
SIMON BROWN
SHANE MOSLEY
FLOYD MAYWEATHER
THOMAS HEARNS
PERNELL WITAKER

Re: BEST WELTERWEIGHTS PAST AND PRESENT

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 00:00
by Victor*KC
RICHARDMCCOMBS wrote:MAURICE BLOCKER
RAY LEONARD
MARVIN HAGLER
RAY ROBINSON
ARON PRYOR
TERRY NORRIS
MILDRICK TAYLOR
SIMON BROWN
SHANE MOSLEY
FLOYD MAYWEATHER
THOMAS HEARNS
PERNELL WITAKER
I love your pick "MILDRICK TAYLOR"

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 00:14
by generic screen name
1. Since when was Marvin Hagler a welterweight?
2. The same Maurice Blocker that got destroyed by Felix Trinidad?

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 00:16
by Victor*KC
generic screen name wrote:1. Since when was Marvin Hagler a welterweight?
2. The same Maurice Blocker that got destroyed by Felix Trinidad?
I think Charlie made a new account..

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 00:33
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
MAURICE BLOCKER WAS TWO-TIME WORLD CHAMPION 1990-93 HE WAS ON HIS WAY OUT WHEN HE LOST TO FELIX TRINADAD.

TRUTH

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 01:26
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
HANDS DOWN HE'S REGARDED AS ONE OF THE BEST WELTERWEIGHTS AND IF HE WAS STILL BOXING HE COULD TAKE ON THESE GUY'S LIKE OSCAR,FLOYD.ETC..

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 02:40
by ringsider
MAURICE BLOCKER one of the best past or present?

Yeh sure, maybe in Mr. Roger's neighborhood. :roll: :roll:

Re: BEST WELTERWEIGHTS PAST AND PRESENT

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 03:17
by dajuggernaut
RICHARDMCCOMBS wrote:MAURICE BLOCKER
RAY LEONARD
MARVIN HAGLER
RAY ROBINSON
ARON PRYOR
TERRY NORRIS
MILDRICK TAYLOR
SIMON BROWN
SHANE MOSLEY
FLOYD MAYWEATHER
THOMAS HEARNS
PERNELL WITAKER
Felix Trinidad?

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 04:46
by m1kee50
Victor*KC wrote:
generic screen name wrote:1. Since when was Marvin Hagler a welterweight?
2. The same Maurice Blocker that got destroyed by Felix Trinidad?
I think Charlie made a new account..
had some fights apparently, so obv not CZ

some NON-AMERICAN names for you to ponder on overlooking

Carlos Palomino

Kid Gavilan

Ted 'Kid' Lewis

Lloyd Honeyghan

John H Stracey

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 05:22
by john2345
and also ...

Carmen Basilio

Jack Britton

Mickey Walker

Jose Napoles

Emile Griffith

Re: TRUTH

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 07:14
by silkov
You're just some dork on the internet who doesn't even know how to type.[/quote]

Takes one to know one!... :lol: :lol: :lol: :box: :TU:

boxing

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 09:55
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
THOSE WERE JUST MY PICKS I RESPECT YOUR PICKS THOSE WERE GOOD FIGHTER'S.

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 10:00
by silkov
Well everyones entitled to their opinion, but Hagler was a Middleweight and Pryorr was a light-welter.... Blocker was a good fighter but not a 'great' fighter... he was clearly beaten by Lloyd Honeyghan who was a better boxer, I'd also rate Mark Breland and Marlon Starling over Blocker and moving back a few years Don Curry and Milton Mccrory....

CORRECTION

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 10:35
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
HAGLER AND PRYOR WERE NOT WELTERWEIGHTS. THEY WERE GREAT FIGHTER'S

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 10:47
by Expug
Blocker was a good fighter, but he had the chance to step up into another level vs. Simon Brown and he got beat.
Brown has to rank above him .

Re: CORRECTION

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 10:48
by m1kee50
RICHARDMCCOMBS wrote:HAGLER AND PRYOR WERE NOT WELTERWEIGHTS. THEY WERE GREAT FIGHTER'S
So why mention them in a topic (posted by you) of best welterweights?

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 10:52
by m1kee50
oh btw he is a relative of mo blocker, whcih explains the nepotism

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 11:20
by Ezzard
Blocker was a good fighter. He'd be competitive with most and almost always gave a good account of himself.

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 11:21
by m1kee50
Ezzard wrote:Blocker was a good fighter. He'd be competitive with most and almost always gave a good account of himself.
fair play, but it just shows it in a different light

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 13:40
by silkov
Heights not everything, if you cant fight height is as useful in the ring as a block of cheese, fact is Blocker could fight, he was more than just tall... he wasnt an all time great though...

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 13:42
by m1kee50
i wasnt being derogatory on blocker, just that explains the choice of outfield pick thats all. who else would big him up as a great welter comapred to the others mentioned?

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 13:44
by silkov
m1kee50 wrote:i wasnt being derogatory on blocker, just that explains the choice of outfield pick thats all. who else would big him up as a great welter comapred to the others mentioned?
He wasnt.

BOXING

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 17:04
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
POINT IS HE WAS ONE OF THE BEST. ESPECIALLY TO COME FROM THE WASHINGTON DC AREA

BOXING

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 18:08
by RICHARDMCCOMBS
DECAGON! WHO ARE YOU? WHAT ARE YOUR STATS.

Re: TRUTH

Posted: 08 Feb 2007, 18:29
by BoxBuzz
Decagon wrote:
RICHARDMCCOMBS wrote:HANDS DOWN HE'S REGARDED AS ONE OF THE BEST WELTERWEIGHTS AND IF HE WAS STILL BOXING HE COULD TAKE ON THESE GUY'S LIKE OSCAR,FLOYD.ETC..
By whom? You?!?!? You're just some dork on the internet who doesn't even know how to type.
Welcome Richard, I see you've met our official greeter Decagon, who knows tons about boxing but has yet to attend the charm seminars we put on here at BoxRec.

Now as for as for Dan Blocker's cousin being a top dog at welter...I imagine your going to head into oncoming traffic with that one. And just how accomplished did you feel Hagler was in this division? hmmm come to think of it he was never defeated as a Welter correct? More than we can say about his MW years. Same can be said about Monzon during his Heavyweight years I suppose. Anyways...Welcome to the forum.