Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post Reply
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15690
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by elmersalsa »

2 Roy Jones Jr victims. 2 bad boys of the sport with great techniques all round. Both of them in their primes were pretty COMPLETE FIGHTERS that could fight any style in front of them. James Toney is one of my favorite fighters. Who wins??? The BHop that whupped Trinidada ones sided or the Toney that beat Michael Nunn and Mike McCallum?
walshb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 612
Joined: 11 Apr 2005, 13:50

Post by walshb »

Toney wins a close decision. Neither guys gets KO'd as both had granite chins, Toney was very inconsistent buty at his peak he was amazing and very good defensively
zuru
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 775
Joined: 10 Mar 2005, 17:48

Post by zuru »

walshb wrote:Toney wins a close decision. Neither guys gets KO'd as both had granite chins, Toney was very inconsistent buty at his peak he was amazing and very good defensively
As a person,I completely dislike Toney,but as a fighter,Man oh man,has he had me eating my words since the start.I think a prime Toney outhustles a very game Hopkins,who just can't land the punches to necessitate the start of a lead.Toney unanimously.
Victor*KC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 313
Joined: 15 Oct 2006, 00:52

Post by Victor*KC »

Tough one B-Hop was more consistent and always came in great shape the same can't be said for Toney.. I think a prime B-Hop has high enough workrate and is fast enough to be able to catch the slick Toney..
Ambling Alp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3627
Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31

Post by Ambling Alp »

Both were beaten by Jones, but Hopkins was competitive and he improved adter the Jones fight. This would probably be like the Toney-Nunn fight, where Toney is outobxed. Unlike that fight, Toney wouldn't be able to knockout Hopkins. Hopkins by decision.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Post by Crease »

Hopkins would destroy Toney!!!!!!
klompton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2738
Joined: 07 Jul 2003, 02:27

Post by klompton »

Hopkins wins this matchup. Wrong style for Toney on top of the fact that Hopkins was a lot more consistent, never lost to a B or even C level fighter which Toney has done more than once at every weight hes fought at (sometimes he got the decision but didnt deserve it). I think Toney always looks great against guys who come to him but Hopkins would be WAY too smart for that, it would be a boring chess match with Toney landing the flashier shots but far to infrequently.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17067
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Post by Seamus »

Exactly Klompton. Toney is at his very best when the other guy comes right at him, but show him a jab and a little lateral movement, and all of a sudden he doesn't look like an all time great. Hopkins by a close but clear decision.
Roco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 750
Joined: 20 May 2008, 07:30

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by Roco »

Assuming this is best against best then on his best day Toney wins a decision over Hopkins.
barrack osama
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 20
Joined: 10 Feb 2012, 23:43

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by barrack osama »

Great fight here. I think Toney takes a split decisoin, his counterpunching just a bit too sharp for B-Hop. I thought this fight was gonna be made in the early 2000's, a shame it wasn't.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re:

Post by AngryGoon38 »

Victor*KC wrote:Tough one B-Hop was more consistent and always came in great shape the same can't be said for Toney.. I think a prime B-Hop has high enough workrate and is fast enough to be able to catch the slick Toney..
^^^^^^^^^^

Basically,This.
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re:

Post by AngryGoon38 »

Ambling Alp wrote:Both were beaten by Jones, but Hopkins was competitive and he improved adter the Jones fight. This would probably be like the Toney-Nunn fight, where Toney is outobxed. Unlike that fight, Toney wouldn't be able to knockout Hopkins. Hopkins by decision.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This too.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re:

Post by Counter-puncher »

Seamus wrote:Exactly Klompton. Toney is at his very best when the other guy comes right at him, but show him a jab and a little lateral movement, and all of a sudden he doesn't look like an all time great. Hopkins by a close but clear decision.
sounds about right to me
Techno89
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 918
Joined: 11 Oct 2011, 13:26

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by Techno89 »

Bernard Hopkins wins with late KO or UD
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Hopkins couldnt KO Toney with a handgun.
flatnoseflynn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by flatnoseflynn »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Hopkins couldnt KO Toney with a handgun.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
flatnoseflynn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 14 Sep 2009, 16:42

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by flatnoseflynn »

You're
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

flatnoseflynn wrote:You're
Use your big-boy words, Flynn. Come on, sound it out, you'll get there...
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by BoxBuzz »

I have to agree, the idea that Hopkins could KO Toney is enough to put a smile on the Sphinx.



GI....I think his hint is a musical one.........."It's up to you New You're New You're"
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

BoxBuzz wrote:I have to agree, the idea that Hopkins could KO Toney is enough to put a smile on the Sphinx.



GI....I think his hint is a musical one.........."It's up to you New You're New You're"
New You're?
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by BoxBuzz »

Yeah...I figure the 're is just a Type-0 and he meant to type New in front of it.
The End
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 931
Joined: 11 Oct 2005, 17:53

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by The End »

Bump

Two great defensive fighters. Both have power but neither are Julian Jackson. Both hall of famers with hall of fame chins. Peak Toney against peak Hopkins, I'm going to go with Toney.

Reasons are Hopkins can tend to go in to cruise control and try to come on late. Toney is a much more active fighter. Also as Hopkins picks up the pace late so does Toney right there with him.

I like both of these guys and their badass no fear attitudes. All in all I feel if Toney had Hopkins discipline he would be looked at as top 10 all time.

Toney UD 12
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46494
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by gilgamesh »

On their best days as Middleweights Toney wins a close decision, holding off a late round surge from Hopkins.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16873
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Hopkins by close decision for me.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Middleweights: Bernard Hopkins vs James Toney

Post by BoxBuzz »

Toney, just too strong in the fundamentals, and Hopkins nonsense will be pretty much a non starter for "point gathering" against this particular opponent. So it's inevitable that Toney would win on points.
Post Reply