Greatest lightweight of all time
Greatest lightweight of all time
Roberto Duran, with all his vigor couldn't hold a candle to Hilmer Kinty. Hilmer was so great, while everyone had their eye on fellow kronk stable mate Thomas Hearns, Hilmer won the lightweight title and later unified the title with Jim Watt. Hilmer lost to Sean O' Grady but later reversed the decision with two wins and a draw against the irishmen. don't forget Hilmer was 3-0 against Duran including that 8th round K.O. and that was while Duran was still a good fighter. He was set back with a 11th round ko loss for the Jr. Welter championship by Costa Zoo, but that was in the twilight of his career and shouldn't be used as an arguement against his greatness.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
There'a good argument for either man being the greatest, however, Benny Leonard's record at lightweight is nothing short of incredible.
Henry Armstrong although he went on to win the Welter title, fought most of his career under the lightweight limit and thought he wasn't lightweight champ for long, was definetly great at the weight.
Henry Armstrong although he went on to win the Welter title, fought most of his career under the lightweight limit and thought he wasn't lightweight champ for long, was definetly great at the weight.
Last edited by jamesmcdonnell on 12 Feb 2006, 17:13, edited 1 time in total.
-
D. Shiznit
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 34
- Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 14:27
Yeah, by outmustling much smaller veterans moving up in weight who were washed up.D. Shiznit wrote:I would have to say Oscar De La Hoya.... the man was unbeatable at lightweight.
Whitaker gave Oscar hell when he was way past his prime at welterweight (which is closer to Oscar's natural weight and way above Sweat Pea.) Sweat Pea was much more elusive at lightweight and, in his prime, he would've pitched a shutout over Oscar.
Re: Greatest lightweight of all time
based on the high number of total fabrications in your post, i'm assuming the last 4 letters of your name refer to crystal meth...i suggest you join the forum at druggedoutlosers.com!!Robmeth wrote:Roberto Duran, with all his vigor couldn't hold a candle to Hilmer Kinty. Hilmer was so great, while everyone had their eye on fellow kronk stable mate Thomas Hearns, Hilmer won the lightweight title and later unified the title with Jim Watt. Hilmer lost to Sean O' Grady but later reversed the decision with two wins and a draw against the irishmen. don't forget Hilmer was 3-0 against Duran including that 8th round K.O. and that was while Duran was still a good fighter. He was set back with a 11th round ko loss for the Jr. Welter championship by Costa Zoo, but that was in the twilight of his career and shouldn't be used as an arguement against his greatness.
alot of folks here would scoff at that, but based on the fact that mayweather had a controversial win over the best LW champ in his first bout at 135 (castillo) & a clearcut win over castillo in his 2nd fight at 135, i think PBF clearly merits consideration for top 5 all-time lightweights...especially considering that PBF, castillo & probably chico corrales will end up in HOF!!!MaxPow wrote:It's hard to make a lightweight head-to-head discussion without mentioning Mayweather.
...i don't know that he was the greatest....i don't think any one fighter can be so positivley identified in this division which has produced to much tlaent for so many years...but my all-time favorite lightweight is ike williams...whom i think ..when at his best..would have to be considered among those at the top of the list.
i could see duran, whitaker, mayweather, williams & benny leonard as top 5...Jaclem wrote:...i don't know that he was the greatest....i don't think any one fighter can be so positivley identified in this division which has produced to much tlaent for so many years...but my all-time favorite lightweight is ike williams...whom i think ..when at his best..would have to be considered among those at the top of the list.
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9007
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Duran was fighting at Welterweight, and lest we forget, had ALREADY beaten Leonard in their first fight.
Leonard was a better all around fighter than Pernell also, he hit with more authority and fought in the pocket well.
Duran was also over 200 lbs in between the 1st and 2nd fights, and the reason he quit was he was on diuretics to lose weight and was completely fucked.
Whittaker would have had to have had the fight of his life to beat Duran, who was a real killer of men at lightweight, not sure who would have won, but would have been a close fight.
DLH, not even close.
Leonard was a better all around fighter than Pernell also, he hit with more authority and fought in the pocket well.
Duran was also over 200 lbs in between the 1st and 2nd fights, and the reason he quit was he was on diuretics to lose weight and was completely fucked.
Whittaker would have had to have had the fight of his life to beat Duran, who was a real killer of men at lightweight, not sure who would have won, but would have been a close fight.
DLH, not even close.
-
scottmallon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 499
- Joined: 08 Aug 2005, 20:41
This is a list compiled by the members of the International Boxing Research Organization of which I am a member. I believe it is pretty accurate.
#1 Benny Leonard
#2 Roberto Duran
#3 Joe Gans
#4 Henry Armstrong
#5 Tony Canzoneri
#6 Ike Williams
#7 Pernell Whitaker
#8 Barney Ross
#9 Julio Cesar Chavez
#10 Lou Ambers
#1 Benny Leonard
#2 Roberto Duran
#3 Joe Gans
#4 Henry Armstrong
#5 Tony Canzoneri
#6 Ike Williams
#7 Pernell Whitaker
#8 Barney Ross
#9 Julio Cesar Chavez
#10 Lou Ambers
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
scottmallon wrote:This is a list compiled by the members of the International Boxing Research Organization of which I am a member. I believe it is pretty accurate.
#1 Benny Leonard
#2 Roberto Duran
#3 Joe Gans
#4 Henry Armstrong
#5 Tony Canzoneri
#6 Ike Williams
#7 Pernell Whitaker
#8 Barney Ross
#9 Julio Cesar Chavez
#10 Lou Ambers
i think jack blackburn should defintley be on the list
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
scottmallon wrote:This is a list compiled by the members of the International Boxing Research Organization of which I am a member. I believe it is pretty accurate.
#1 Benny Leonard
#2 Roberto Duran
#3 Joe Gans
#4 Henry Armstrong
#5 Tony Canzoneri
#6 Ike Williams
#7 Pernell Whitaker
#8 Barney Ross
#9 Julio Cesar Chavez
#10 Lou Ambers
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
As I said, what about the first fight? Duran came into that fight properly prepared and totally outpsyched leonard, it's funny how people often seem to overlook that fight and focus instead on the horribly out of condition version Leonard beat.
At lightweight at his best, nobody ever ran rings around Duran. It would have been an even fight, and a pick em.
At lightweight at his best, nobody ever ran rings around Duran. It would have been an even fight, and a pick em.
-
Borinken25
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 721
- Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 12:28