Those that show some promise, any you think could go on to make it as a pro
Today's Amateur's could be tomorrow's Pro Champ's
I agree and something needs to be doneRoss wrote:Good thread, unfortunately IMO ameteur boxing in Oz is going nowhere and it is hurting the fighters. There are now three boxing bodies- Boxing Australia, The Ameteur Boxing League and Global Boxing. Boxing Australia is the offically Govt recognised organisation and they ban boxers who compete in te other organisations tournaments. So the pool s about one third of what it could be.
In Nth Qld there is no Boxing Australia presence so if a fighter wats to fight hemust fight League or fl south at his own expense to fight.
As a trainer I would like to see a National body with computerised record keeping and much better organisation.
Ametuer boxers to watch from FNQ - Daniel Perrin - League State and National Champion at 60 kg; Jay Thompson 68kg - due to lack of boxing fights he sometmes enters kick boxing tournaments as he did last night and scored 2 stoppage wins; Rory Hanlan 74kg League State Champ 7-0;
Ross
J_Potter wrote:Good topic. First of all, I am kiwi living in Auckland, so I guess my view points in this thread are pretty neutral.
It does appear that having more than one (3 in Aust. case) amateur governing body would seem to hurt the sport. I am sure you would agree that having a unified body, or if the rules of AIBA accredited (Boxing Aust.) body allowed inclusion of members from other bodies, this would only strengthen Australian amateur boxing and therefore increase chance at world and Olympic success, which funny enough is I imagine would be one of the main objectives of Boxing Australia.
I am probably not to qualified to make to much judgment as I am not to educated on the politics of boxing within Australia. I do intend to do some research on the topic when I have some time of course ( I am suppose to be studying for 3 exams for uni next week) but I can only imagine that the current political environment came about from frustration and lack of ability maybe of the original governing body ( I assume Boxing Aust. But I could be wrong?). However if this was the case, the formation of other governing bodies such as the league has probably had the very unintended consequence of limiting international Aussie amateur success.
Although, it does seem that the AIS sponsorship program for boxing has worked very well for Boxing Aust.(some would argue not!) since its inception, and it would seem a real shame that the program and Australia has not have full access to the amateur boxing pool.
I can see the argument from Boxing Aust. point of view. AIBA policy is to ensure that boxers are amateur, and have not fought pro at any stage in their career, amongst other rule conflict, and allowing inclusion of boxers from other governing bodies may risk control of this fundamental rule. Does anyone know if the League or Global have this same policy and strictly adhere to it? I know Boxing NZ have always been very stringent in regards to this over the time.
Boxing NZ is the only amateur governing body in New Zealand, although it is known that 'rebel' tournaments are held with unregistered boxers take place from time to time. Interesting though, which could be applicable to this thread and the topic of Boxing Aust. allowing boxers of other bodies to also become members, is Boxing NZ recent relaxation of attitude of allowing kickboxers to compete in Amateur boxing fights. Up until recently, it was a strict no no that kickboxers could be seen to be associated with amateur boxing, let alone be allowed to register and compete!
Even though this has probably ruffled a few feathers of the old guard, from a boxers point of view, at least I have got a couple of extra fights out of it! I still have a small concern that there could be a loss of control of ensuring 'amateur status' integrity though.
Something off the topic, I see that someone has posted that Fletcher is not attending the worlds due to injury. What a blow! mind you, the worlds was always going to a long shot for any Australians. Anyone know what his injury is and how long he is likely to be out for? Hopefully not too long as he by far Austrlaias best chance for Olympics next year.
I see that Mahoney had a good win first up -RSCOS RD2
regards
JP
J_Potter wrote:yeah it seems this is where the other bodies become incompatible with the AIBA body. Like you say, amateur and pro R&J's and boxers must be kept separate, as required by AIBA. So if the league and/or Global were to somehow become compatible or accepting by Boxing Aust., they would have to adopt the same policy. However, as reasons you stated (i.e. remoteness and limited r&j's for both amateur and pro), this is probably not practical and would defeat the point of having a separate bodies in the first place. On the same note, I'm not entirely sure if club coaches here must be a strictly amateur coach and hold a amateur license. I might be wrong, but I am sure their might be a coach or two that train and corner both here. I will check this out.
Just a question, I have heard that Global is more suited to a 'pro style' of boxing opposed to now 'computer styled boxing. Does anyone agree with or otherwise? Is global a better learning ground for pro's to develop?
Another unfortunate aspect for Global and the League, is not being eligible for international competition, even at club level, due to most other clubs in other countries being AIBA affliated. Or are their other non-AIBA bodies overseas that engage with the League and Global with competition?
JP
I am not 100% but 99% that League have competed at Arafura Games or at least some of the fighters.fox wrote:Not sure about the league but Global hasnt fought in the arafura games. A couple of boys from darwin fought in them before they joined Global Amateur Boxing.