Both men beat Azumah Nelson, even though one got screwed in the ass by the judges. Fenech beat Nelson in my view, when the Professor was probably ready to be taken...Sanchez beat Nelson with just 13 fights.
Who wins?
Featherweights: Jeff Fenech vs Salvador Sanchez
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 15678
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
-
ringsider
- Heavyweight
OK aftr having a look at Sanchez record I have trouble believing he could stop Fenech. The Azumah that he beat was very young and inexperienced.
At Feather which was Jeffs best weight I think he has a superior record against better fighters.
I think the poster whos said that Fench didn't deserve to be in the same ring may be involved in just a touch of hero worship.
Fenech in 6
and thats the bottom line!
At Feather which was Jeffs best weight I think he has a superior record against better fighters.
I think the poster whos said that Fench didn't deserve to be in the same ring may be involved in just a touch of hero worship.
Fenech in 6
and thats the bottom line!
-
yiddo14
- Heavyweight
Re: Featherweights: Jeff Fenech vs Salvador Sanchez
I agree that Fenech deserved the first Nelson fight, but what about the rematch!elmersalsa wrote:Both men beat Azumah Nelson, even though one got screwed in the ass by the judges. Fenech beat Nelson in my view, when the Professor was probably ready to be taken...Sanchez beat Nelson with just 13 fights.
Who wins?
Sanchez wins, every day of the week.
-
Datsue
- Heavyweight
Har-de-fuckin'-har-har.Grant wrote:OK aftr having a look at Sanchez record I have trouble believing he could stop Fenech. The Azumah that he beat was very young and inexperienced.
At Feather which was Jeffs best weight I think he has a superior record against better fighters.
I think the poster whos said that Fench didn't deserve to be in the same ring may be involved in just a touch of hero worship.
Fenech in 6
and thats the bottom line!
Look, mate, there's nothing sadder than a man whose slighted feelings of nationalism make him open his mouth & look like a twat, so I'm not going to take the piss.
But in terms of ATG'ness, Fenech's best win at 126lbs was MARCOS VILLASANA.
MARCOS VILLASANA. Good fighter, that.
Sanchez stopped Danny Lopez, Azumah Nelson, an unbeaten, undamaged, young & brand-new Wilfredo Gomez: he outpointed top operators like Cowdell, LaPorte & Castillo. He did not hide in SE Asia beating up ex-kickboxers who couldn't throw a straight punch. His resumé -- excepting the cynical division jumping -- reads better than Fenech's, & HE DIED AT TWENTY-THREE YEARS OLD.
Also, I have seen both fight (obviously unlike yourself). Therefore I know that Sanchez was at his absolute best against come-forward, high-punch volume sluggers: he had a shit-hot defence, literally could not be hurt & broke the heart of very hard men by simply not tiring, ever: then after they'd missed 43,566 wild swings, he'd beat the shit out of them.
Which is kind of what would happen against Fenech. It would've been a truly great fight: but it would've fricking retired Fenech. He'd make even less sense than he does now.
OK OK we have established that you have a much higher opinion of yourself than I do. Thats OK
I am not a Fenech lover I think that chasing bullshit titles in 4 weight divisions does not neccessarily make for a more accomplished career. Better to dominate one division than to win a portion of four titles in different weight deivisions. Never the less you said that fenech doesn't belong in the same ring at feather, thats where I take a different opinion.
you said it would have been a great fight (at least for a while) which is exactly what I said. Where is our difference of opinion?
I am not a Fenech lover I think that chasing bullshit titles in 4 weight divisions does not neccessarily make for a more accomplished career. Better to dominate one division than to win a portion of four titles in different weight deivisions. Never the less you said that fenech doesn't belong in the same ring at feather, thats where I take a different opinion.
you said it would have been a great fight (at least for a while) which is exactly what I said. Where is our difference of opinion?
They were very similar in size, but fenech may have had the edge in workrate and strength, but it may not have been a factor, as Sanchez was the best counter puncher I have ever seen, and I would give him the edge in power.
I actually see this as a bit like Mayweather v Hatton, but with Sanchez finding the range earlier due to Jeff being more orthordox than Hatton, with Less holding.
After 7 rounds I can see Sanchez scoring with right hand lead counters and stopping a brave Jeff on his feet in 10.
Sanchez was always on his toes, for 15 rounds, but got power on every shot. Amazing boxer RIP.
I actually see this as a bit like Mayweather v Hatton, but with Sanchez finding the range earlier due to Jeff being more orthordox than Hatton, with Less holding.
After 7 rounds I can see Sanchez scoring with right hand lead counters and stopping a brave Jeff on his feet in 10.
Sanchez was always on his toes, for 15 rounds, but got power on every shot. Amazing boxer RIP.
Yup, I can see it going that wayKO Artist wrote:They were very similar in size, but fenech may have had the edge in workrate and strength, but it may not have been a factor, as Sanchez was the best counter puncher I have ever seen, and I would give him the edge in power.
I actually see this as a bit like Mayweather v Hatton, but with Sanchez finding the range earlier due to Jeff being more orthordox than Hatton, with Less holding.
After 7 rounds I can see Sanchez scoring with right hand lead counters and stopping a brave Jeff on his feet in 10.
Sanchez was always on his toes, for 15 rounds, but got power on every shot. Amazing boxer RIP.