Khan gets driving ban for 140mph

johnswan1 · Post by **johnswan1** » 07 Jan 2008, 10:47

Pity the idiot didn't get banned for life.

Boxer Amir Khan has been banned from driving for 42 days and fined £1,000 for driving up to 140mph on a motorway.

The 20-year-old had been convicted of breaking the speed limit while driving his sports car on the M62 on New Year's Eve in 2006.

Khan was believed to be driving his BMW 6 series convertible at speeds between 135mph and 140mph.

A police officer told Rochdale Magistrates' Court his speedometer was "off the clock" at 155mph as he pursued the Commonwealth lightweight title-holder along the motorway.

Pc Paul Saunders said he travelled almost seven miles before he caught up with the BMW.

Sentencing Khan, 21, of Bolton, district judge Pamela Baldwin said there was not enough evidence to prove the Olympic silver-medalist had exceeded 100mph but she was satisfied that it was in excess of 70mph.

Khan had denied the charge but during his trial accepted his speed may have reached around 75mph.

Outside court, Khan maintained he did not reach speeds of up to 140mph.

He said: "I did not drive that fast. I am not a fast driver.

"I am pleased to get this over with and I have learned my lesson. It will never happen again."

The suspension will run concurrently with the six-month ban he received last October after being convicted of careless driving when knocking down a pedestrian on a pelican crossing.

oliverfennell · Post by **oliverfennell** » 07 Jan 2008, 10:53

42 days?

That's hardly a deterrent. Suspect the likes of you and I might be more severely punished!

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 07 Jan 2008, 11:08

He's just asking for a Mexican to bash his head on a turn buckle, retire his ass and put on 50lbs.

Chambers2 · Post by **Chambers2** » 07 Jan 2008, 11:12

42 days is a piss take, I've had colds that have lasted longer than that

Carbo · Post by **Carbo** » 07 Jan 2008, 11:30

No doubt the car lobby think it's a ludicrously harsh waste of time for a police force who should be out catching 'real' criminals.

The punishments for speeding and reckless driving of all types is far too lenient considering the damage this driving can do, and 40-something days is evidence of this.

emma · Post by **emma** » 07 Jan 2008, 12:00

Khan recently bought himself a brand new £56 grand range rover.

Poncey · Post by **Poncey** » 07 Jan 2008, 12:01

emma wrote:Khan recently bought himself a brand new £56 grand range rover.

Wasn't it white leather interior as well?

Classy

emma · Post by **emma** » 07 Jan 2008, 12:10

Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:
emma wrote:Khan recently bought himself a brand new £56 grand range rover.
Wasn't it white leather interior as well?

Classy

yh.

hitman_hatton1 · Post by **hitman_hatton1** » 07 Jan 2008, 12:12

Chambers2 wrote:42 days is a piss take, I've had colds that have lasted longer than that

i haven't.

but yeah 42 days is a joke.

no evidence to check he was going over 100mph.

er how about the pc's evidence and the fact he was driving a top of the range BMW.

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 07 Jan 2008, 12:51

We know the limit is 70 MPH but thousands every day do up to 90 MPH on motorways and the police seem to take little notice but go near or over the ton and you are asking for trouble - I thought I was about to be pulled at 80 MPH a few weeks back but the cops were more interested in the Aston Martin that had flashed past and was then slowing having spotted the patrol vehicle - Who is Khan kidding saying the officer is a liar, its Khan who is telling porkys - You dont buy a car like a BMW to just tootle round at National speed limits - I have yet to see a BMW driver who isnt gunning it.

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:18

£1000 fine! what a joke a grand is nothing to me never mind khan

Rocky Balboa · Post by **Rocky Balboa** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:28

Might aswell have said: "Ok, Mr Khan, you will receive no punishment for breaking the speed limit". What the fcuk is a grand to Khan? 42 days is an insult to the intelligence of the public.

If it was say, you or I, the book would be thrown at us 100%.

There's absolutely no detterent in Britain whatsoever.

Podmore_Birmingham · Post by **Podmore_Birmingham** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:30

Same with Pete Doherty.

One rule for 'faces' and another for everyone else.

oliverfennell · Post by **oliverfennell** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:34

Podmore_Birmingham wrote:Same with Pete Doherty.

One rule for 'faces' and another for everyone else.

An amusing letter in Viz once went something like this:

I have been writing to you for years and have never had a letter published. Instead, I see many letters complaining about something and concluding that it is one rule for one set of people, and another rule for the rest of us.

Which leads me to believe there is one rule for people writing letters about there being one rule for one set of people, and another rule for the rest of us, and another rule for the rest of us.

p4p1 · Post by **p4p1** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:58

wel sounds like he got away with it pretty well especially if he had a previous record

Exoddus · Post by **Exoddus** » 07 Jan 2008, 14:59

What worse is his other sentence.

He over took in the wrong lane approaching a red light which he went through while over the speed limit. Hitting a guy who he could have killed. The guy got of lucky with a broken leg and Khan only got a 6 months ban. If I did that, I would be looking at 2 years.

This ban should have been increased because it's his second driving offence.

Does he have to re-sit his driving test again?

harrygreb · Post by **harrygreb** » 07 Jan 2008, 15:15

dont blame khan blame the silly cow who judged the whole thing.
if i remember rightly it was another silly cow who judged docherty last time he was up. the men are bad enough but women judges seem to get teary eyed very easily - i hope i'm up against one next time

oldenglishcider · Post by **oldenglishcider** » 07 Jan 2008, 15:27

140mph- could have killed someone!
Whats he think just b/c he's a superstar he can put everyone elses life into jeopardy?

knockout · Post by **knockout** » 07 Jan 2008, 16:39

The police had no evidence he was doing 140 or he would of got a much bigger ban i am sure.
It seems they mustn't have had the recording equipment or a camera in the car

E · Post by E » 07 Jan 2008, 17:02

Podmore_Birmingham wrote:Same with Pete Doherty.

One rule for 'faces' and another for everyone else.

YEah but Pete Doherty is a drug addict who is only harming himself.

Driving around at 140 mph is seriously endangering other humans.

Syntax Error · Post by **Syntax Error** » 07 Jan 2008, 17:07

It sounds like Amir Khan & cars are just not compatible!!!

They should raise the driving age to 25!!!!!!!

banjo · Post by **banjo** » 07 Jan 2008, 19:08

Syntax Error wrote:It sounds like Amir Khan & cars are just not compatible!!!

They should raise the driving age to 25!!!!!!!

why should young people suffer because of wankers like khan, i need my car for my job just like other people

Syntax Error · Post by **Syntax Error** » 08 Jan 2008, 07:11

banjo wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:It sounds like Amir Khan & cars are just not compatible!!!

They should raise the driving age to 25!!!!!!!
why should young people suffer because of wankers like khan, i need my car for my job just like other people

I'm just being facetious.

overhand_right · Post by **overhand_right** » 08 Jan 2008, 09:00

Maybe the judge took it easy on him because she didn't want to be considered 'racist'?

WildWaylon · Post by **WildWaylon** » 08 Jan 2008, 09:08

Syntax Error wrote:It sounds like Amir Khan & cars are just not compatible!!!

They should raise the driving age to 25!!!!!!!

Certainly for cars over 1.6 L, but having said that you can just as easily kill someone with a 1.1L - No the courts must be stricter, that has to be the only answer - What gets me is how variable sentencing can be for the same crime - I know a small town where the magistrates are really harsh while just a few miles away in the city they are far more leniant - I suppose you can see why, city courts see far more people and you cant hand out custodials to everyone - I think a persons earnings should be taken into account because a grand to Khan is like £10 or even less to many of us - If you are going to fine someone it has to hurt or there is no punishment - Anyone found guilty of dangerous driving which means putting the lives of others at risk, should get time - The more serious the offence the longer the sentence followed by a three year ban starting from their day of release and then a re test - Harsh punishments like that for all including celebs, boxers, footballers etc ned to be applied.