My top 10 Heavyweights

Post Reply
masterorder19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16
Joined: 05 Jan 2008, 13:34

My top 10 Heavyweights

Post by masterorder19 »

1) Jack Johnson
2) Sam Langford
3) Joe Louis
4) Sonny Liston
5) Muhammad Ali
6) Sam Mcvey
7) Joe Jeannette
8) Harry Wills
9) Goerge Foreman
10) Jack Dempsey

This is a prime to prime head to head basis
Borinken25
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 12:28

Post by Borinken25 »

First welcome to the forum. Second if this prime to prime head to head basis, how come Ali is ranked below Liston? You do know they fought twice and Ali won both fights.
masterorder19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16
Joined: 05 Jan 2008, 13:34

Post by masterorder19 »

Borinken25 wrote:First welcome to the forum. Second if this prime to prime head to head basis, how come Ali is ranked below Liston? You do know they fought twice and Ali won both fights.
Yeah I kow that but Liston wasn't in his prime by then...And both those fights are speculation..We all know the second fight was a joke and i have truly eliev the first one was too...Liston had the heart to fight through 5 rounds with a broken jaw and he would then quit wit a injured shoulder like that?? i don't know but either way Liston wasn't in his prime anyways..
Borinken25
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 12:28

Post by Borinken25 »

Sonny Liston past his prime? Are you sure? Liston was coming of two huge KO wins against Patterson and after he went on to win at least 14 more times and many of those wins were by KO. How does that make Liston past his prime? More likely he was outclassed by a better fighter.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Liston was past his peak. He was pretty rusty, as well. I've seen people fly way overboard & say in a prime-for-prime match-up, Liston wouldn't have stood even a puncher's chance against the Ali of 65-67, which is rubbish IMO.

But, I do find it hard to envision Liston winning. It's not impossible --- Liston's reach was greater, his jab heavier & when younger, he had deceptive boxing skills. However, he has to overcome a clear stylistic disadvantage & a brilliant boxing brain which likely adds up to a late stoppage defeat.

I doubt flat-footed Jack Johnson would've been able to hang with Joe Louis' combinations, either.
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Post by dempseyfire »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
I doubt flat-footed Jack Johnson would've been able to hang with Joe Louis' combinations, either.
Are you seriously insinuating Louis had quicker feet than Johnson?
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

"Are you seriously insinuating Louis had quicker feet than Johnson?" - DempseyFire

Not at all. I'm insinuating that Johnson wouldn't be able to get out of the way of Louis' hooks & uppercuts brought off the jab. No mention of Louis' footwork.
Marlin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5078
Joined: 08 May 2006, 06:56

Post by Marlin »

Borinken25 wrote:Sonny Liston past his prime? Are you sure? Liston was coming of two huge KO wins against Patterson and after he went on to win at least 14 more times and many of those wins were by KO. How does that make Liston past his prime? More likely he was outclassed by a better fighter.
Image
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Post by Robinson »

hey mate.... curious to know if you can list what your fave fights are for each guy that you have seen.

Kym
ben geoghegan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 151
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 22:33

Post by ben geoghegan »

Nice list !
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Post by Robinson »

Any one can make a list.

Justifying it is another thing.
Grant
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 23 Jan 2004, 21:41

Re: My top 10 Heavyweights

Post by Grant »

masterorder19 wrote:1) Jack Johnson
2) Sam Langford
3) Joe Louis
4) Sonny Liston
5) Muhammad Ali
6) Sam Mcvey
7) Joe Jeannette
8) Harry Wills
9) Goerge Foreman
10) Jack Dempsey

This is a prime to prime head to head basis
Are some of these guys just made up names?
I Feel Fine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2097
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 16:48

Post by I Feel Fine »

Even if you wanted to say that Liston wasn't in his prime against Clay, which he wasn't, Clay wasn't in his prime either, he was still developing. The whole "he would fight through a broken jaw but quit with a shoulder injury" argument is null. Duran was involved in some great wars, but quit out of frustration against Leonard. Same deal with Liston. When you have an opponent in front of you who is there to hit, that's one thing. When you can't find your opponent and are losing round after round, you might be more tempted to say "ah, screw it."

All that said, I'm pretty concinvinced that Liston on the night that he lost to Clay was still good enough to beat Patterson, Machen, Folley or Williams. Clay just had the style to beat him.

I'll never understand the logic for ranking Johnson ahead of Ali and Louis. Not that I don't like Johnson, but but I don't see him beating them head to head.

I'm glad that you appreciate pre-30's Heavyweights, and think more boxing fans should. But that said, you're not giving the rest of Heavyweight history a fair shake either. No Larry Holmes, Joe Frazier, Evander Holyfield, Rocky Marciano?
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

Liston was past his best and was rusty but even so Ali had his measure and although I'd have loved to have seen the rematch when Liston was fully focused (before the cancellation) it would be more to see how Ali coped with him, and how close it would be, rather than any anticipation that Liston would win.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Robinson wrote:Any one can make a list.

Justifying it is another thing.
He doesn't have to justify it, it's his opinion. Certainly not to posters on this forum.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Re: My top 10 Heavyweights

Post by The Great John L »

Grant wrote:Are some of these guys just made up names?
See what I mean? Why justify an opinion to a crowd that makes posts like this?
masterorder19
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16
Joined: 05 Jan 2008, 13:34

Post by masterorder19 »

Robinson wrote:Any one can make a list.

Justifying it is another thing.
SORRY MAN BUT I CAN ONLY GET ONLINE AT WORK I DON'T HAVE A COMPUTER BUT i'L MAKE MY NOTES AND THEN I WILL WRITE WHY I FEEL THIS WAY..AND WHY I PICKED MY LIST..SORRY U DON'T AGREE..
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Post by HomicideHenry »

As far as a Johnson-Louis hypothetical match-up, it's a bit of a mystery. Joe Louis, during the NCR tournaments in 1967-1968, stated that Jack Blackburn (his trainer) said the only man he felt could have beaten Joe at his best was Jack Johnson, that Johnson had everything a fighter could want and then some.

But on the flip side, when Johnson was in his 50's, he had called Joe Louis every name in the book, labeling him as a green horn who would trip over his own feet, betting against him every time he fought, and even went so far as to even challenge the Brown Bomber in the ring...Jack Blackburn, when Johnson ran up the the Louis camp, told Johnson to get the hell off the property, and would later say: "That big cat (Johnson) never gave anybody any credit, he'd want no part of Chappie (Joe)."

The list isn't too bad, because there is alot of fighters that you can make a very solid argument for being the "greatest" of all time. Hell, at one time I believed John L. Sullivan was the greatest, only to change my mind and touted that Johnson was the greatest, and so on and so forth. Though my list now is vastly different than it used to be when I was younger, I still believe I could make the argument that Johnson, Louis, Sullivan and others outside of Muhammad Ali could be the greatest.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

HomicideHenry wrote:Hell, at one time I believed John L. Sullivan was the greatest, only to change my mind and touted that Johnson was the greatest, and so on and so forth. Though my list now is vastly different than it used to be when I was younger, I still believe I could make the argument that Johnson, Louis, Sullivan and others outside of Muhammad Ali could be the greatest.
Excellent logic HH...
Robinson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4415
Joined: 24 Apr 2007, 22:34

Post by Robinson »

You dont have to justify anything to me or any here. BUT for me I think if one is going to make a list, and be absolute on this decision then I think it makes sense to give a reason for each pick.

Im not one for Top Ten Lists, unless one has with confidence watches ENOUGH or researched the guys in contention.

I also find it hard to put guys on a list of HW when some never wore the strap. Granted that they were avoided and the sport was racist with the colour bar. BUT without a doubt when one is a CHAMPION his opponents come with more into the fight, trying to dislodge the man from his throne.
So it stands to reason that defending a title is alot harder than in some cases winning it.

BUt that is just my humble opinion, and I am after all here to express mine BUT also to learn what other people have to say or have experienced from the sport.

Kym
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: My top 10 Heavyweights

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

The Great John L wrote:
Grant wrote:Are some of these guys just made up names?
See what I mean? Why justify an opinion to a crowd that makes posts like this?
:lol:
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: My top 10 Heavyweights

Post by BoxBuzz »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
Grant wrote:Are some of these guys just made up names?
See what I mean? Why justify an opinion to a crowd that makes posts like this?
:lol:
What's the problem? Every name on that list was made up. It just happens they were made up by their mama's...and in some cases their daddy's. Oh...and some gave themselves their names.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

It could become one of those lasting quotes in boxing forum history --- I still remember an infamous one-liner that passed into legend...

"Joppy lost because of the ring."

They are indeed real fighters, Grant.
Post Reply