Witter v Hopkins

Post Reply
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 667
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Witter v Hopkins

Post by whatashambles »

Word from 5live is that this could happen on March 22nd in Atlantic City. Opinions? Good fight for Witter I think. Gets him some exposure in the US, might help him in his search for the Hatton fight
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27499
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Witter v Hopkins

Post by stujones »

whatashambles wrote:Word from 5live is that this could happen on March 22nd in Atlantic City. Opinions? Good fight for Witter I think. Gets him some exposure in the US, might help him in his search for the Hatton fight
Good if it is on TV..... needs US TV.

Still think Castillo is the better option, but this is more winnable.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 667
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Post by whatashambles »

Rees Kotelnik schedueled for March in Cardiff as well. I think the Witter fight would be part of the Casamayor/Katsidis fight as both Hopkins and Witter are promoted by Goldenboy so almost definitely would get TV coverage
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27499
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

whatashambles wrote:Rees Kotelnik schedueled for March in Cardiff as well. I think the Witter fight would be part of the Casamayor/Katsidis fight as both Hopkins and Witter are promoted by Goldenboy so almost definitely would get TV coverage
Would still depend on the scheduling - if there was a big bill (PPV) the week before in the states... then they could replay that and only show the main event. Like they did with fights like Corrales vs Freitas (no other fights shown, just a replay of Williams vs Tyson).
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Post by Poncey »

stujones wrote:
whatashambles wrote:Rees Kotelnik schedueled for March in Cardiff as well. I think the Witter fight would be part of the Casamayor/Katsidis fight as both Hopkins and Witter are promoted by Goldenboy so almost definitely would get TV coverage
Would still depend on the scheduling - if there was a big bill (PPV) the week before in the states... then they could replay that and only show the main event. Like they did with fights like Corrales vs Freitas (no other fights shown, just a replay of Williams vs Tyson).
Is Witter definately still under GBP. They weren't involved with the Harris fight, although might've been because it was in the UK, and their website isn't the best at being updated for fighters under contract (Ibragimov isn't a GBP fighter anymore I don't think).
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 667
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Post by whatashambles »

Would still depend on the scheduling - if there was a big bill (PPV) the week before in the states... then they could replay that and only show the main event. Like they did with fights like Corrales vs Freitas (no other fights shown, just a replay of Williams vs Tyson).
Week before is Pac/JMM
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27499
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

whatashambles wrote:
Would still depend on the scheduling - if there was a big bill (PPV) the week before in the states... then they could replay that and only show the main event. Like they did with fights like Corrales vs Freitas (no other fights shown, just a replay of Williams vs Tyson).
Week before is Pac/JMM
Well it could depend on what they consider the main event out of the Hopkins vs Witter or Cas vs Katisdis fight then. They'll definately repeat Pac vs JMM.
Box Office
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 183
Joined: 08 Mar 2007, 15:28

Post by Box Office »

Good news for Witter
Hopkins has the right family name to shoot Witter into those big fights
like he should be. Lets see what D-HOP has against the best in the World at 140.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Post by Poncey »

Box Office wrote:Good news for Witter
Hopkins has the right family name to shoot Witter into those big fights
like he should be. Lets see what D-HOP has against the best in the World at 140.
He couldn't beat Forbes, in reality, so Witter will stop him if he's in the mood or win on points provided it's not the same judges as Hopkins had against Forbes.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 667
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Post by whatashambles »

Oh and word is Calzaghe Hopkins is to be formally announced some point next week by Warren
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Post by Maelstrom »

Well I guess it is a good fight to keep Witter ticking along and get US exposure, (particulalry from the name), but its no blockbuster.

His long time nemesis has been in with Mayweather recently and other big named are being discussed.

This however, would just be another ticking along job for Witter.

This would be about giving Demetrius his only possible shot - and one he wont be able to take against Witter. He's too good....

But when will JW get his big, defining fight. The one that is going to raise him from mediocre purses for a WBC champ to six figures. Perhaps as an earlier poster suggested, Castillo was the better option?

I'm starting to get worried about Froch as well. When is his big chance coming?
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

interesting fight.

hopkins likes fighting at his own pace from long range.

a little like witter does actually.

witter could well lose that one.

up for grabs fight.
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 667
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Post by whatashambles »

I'm starting to get worried about Froch as well. When is his big chance coming?
He was on saying he will fight Inkin as the WBC eliminator. If he wins that then he has plenty of options, and depending on whether Calzaghe dumps the WBC belt, he would become holder. If he didn't then Froch would be mandatory.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Post by Chambers2 »

Excellent news, its the type of fight Junior needs to be involved in
Post Reply