BoxRec

1. (1.) Joe Calzaghe
2. (2.) Ricky Hatton
3. (3.) David Haye
4. (4.) Junior Witter
5. (5.) Clinton Woods
6. (6.) Alex Arthur
7. (7.) Enzo Maccarinelli
8. (8.) Carl Froch
9. (9.) Scott Harrison
10. (10.) Gavin Rees

11. (11.) Jamie Moore
12. (12.) Nicky Cook
13. (13.) Bernard Dunne
14. (14.) Matt Skelton
15. (15.) John Duddy
16. (19.) Colin Lynes
17. (16.) Wayne Elcock
18. (17.) Wayne McCullough
19. (18.) Ted Bami
20. (20.) Michael Hunter

21. (21.) Carl Johanneson
22. (22.) Jonathan Thaxton
23. (23.) Amir Khan
24. (24.) Howard Eastman
25. (25.) Kevin McIntyre
26. (26.) Bradley Pryce
27. (27.) Ian Napa
28. (28.) Kevin Anderson
29. (29.) John Simpson
30. (30.) Brian Magee

Any comments, criticisms or P4P lists are very welcome.

I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

Horse wrote:Any comments, criticisms or P4P lists are very welcome.

Every month you have Scott Harrison in there when he hasn't even fought in god knows how long. Take him out for christ sake.

Dioufy wrote:I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

Well he should undoubtly be in their, I can't even see him, I'm not sure if it's because I'm drunk, or because he's not there.

Dioufy wrote:I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

I think having Mitchell that high in the rankings would be very premature. If he beats Johanneson in March then he will enter the list, but certainly not that high.

jackthehat wrote:i wouldnt have Alex Arther that high, how could you put him above Maccrinelli and Froch???????? Who has Arther boxed??? hes gonna get smashed off of Guzman

Errm he has done more than Froch currently winning all 3 Brit, Comm and Euro belts then winning a WBO Interim so ranking Arthur higher than Froch Is logical.

Lynes should be higher, and Dunne looks far to high for me - And please don't bother explaining it, because I wont agree :)

Twinkle Toes wrote:Lynes should be higher, and Dunne looks far to high for me - And please don't bother explaining it, because I wont agree :)

i would have had Lynes at 11 myself

ArtOfWar wrote:

Horse wrote:Any comments, criticisms or P4P lists are very welcome.

Every month you have Scott Harrison in there when he hasn't even fought in god knows how long. Take him out for christ sake.

Harrison is making a comeback, so it would be silly to take him out now.

Horse wrote:

ArtOfWar wrote:

Horse wrote:Any comments, criticisms or P4P lists are very welcome.

Every month you have Scott Harrison in there when he hasn't even fought in god knows how long. Take him out for christ sake.

Harrison is making a comeback, so it would be silly to take him out now.

the 'Jesus' effect.... hes due a second coming, you know!

HairyBoxe24 wrote:

Dioufy wrote:I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

Well he should undoubtly be in their, I can't even see him, I'm not sure if it's because I'm drunk, or because he's not there.

He is not there.

Max Molyneux wrote:

jackthehat wrote:i wouldnt have Alex Arther that high, how could you put him above Maccrinelli and Froch???????? Who has Arther boxed??? hes gonna get smashed off of Guzman

Errm he has done more than Froch currently winning all 3 Brit, Comm and Euro belts then winning a WBO Interim so ranking Arthur higher than Froch Is logical.

I agree with Max, and add that Maccarinelli has not fought better opposition than Arthur either.

Arthur has boxed many decent European and domestic fighters. Who have Froch or Maccarinelli boxed that are so much better?

jackthehat wrote:Bernard Dunne is also far to high, hes just been exposed big time by a big underdog. yeah he might come back but until then he cant be rated that high

Martinez was not a big underdog, he was the mandatory challenger and known as a dangerous puncher.

Dunne is perhaps a little high, but I can't see him being that many places lower on a reasonable list.

are you seriously suggesting gavin rees is a better boxer p4p than amir khan? and colin lynes?
let me out of this thread

MatthewS wrote:

Twinkle Toes wrote:Lynes should be higher, and Dunne looks far to high for me - And please don't bother explaining it, because I wont agree :)

i would have had Lynes at 11 myself

I would have liked to have raised Lynes higher, but I couldn't justify raising him too many places for beating Tolppola.

Horse wrote:

Dioufy wrote:I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

I think having Mitchell that high in the rankings would be very premature. If he beats Johanneson in March then he will enter the list, but certainly not that high.

He would enter the list? By that I have to assume that you leaving him out was no mistake then.

harrygreb wrote:are you seriously suggesting gavin rees is a better boxer p4p than amir khan? and colin lynes?

Yes.

Amateur Boxers P4P

Frankie Gavin (GBR) WC
Joseph Murray (GBR)
Bradley Saunders (GBR)
Darren Sutherland (IRL)
David Price (GBR)
Kennet Egan (IRL)
James Degale (GBR)
Paddy Barnes (IRL)
Daniel Price (GBR)
Stephen Smith (GBR)

Roy Sheehan (IRL)
Billy Joe Saunders (GBR)
Cathal McMonagle (IRL)
Fundo Mhura (GBR)
Neil Perkins (GBR)
Tony Jeffries (GBR)
Thomas Stalker (GBR)
Conor Ahern (IRL)
Darren Langley (GBR)
Darren O'Neil (IRL)

Callum Johnson (GBR)
Carl Frampton (IRL)
Ryan Lindberg (IRL)
David Oliver Joyce (IRL)
John Joe Joyce (IRL)
Paul Butler (GBR)
Eamon O'Kane (IRL)
Michael Maguire (GBR)
Obed Mbwakongo (GBR)
Eamon Finnegan (IRL)

ok, as i asked the question about rees ability against that of khan and lynes and you so wisely answered "yes", i take my leave of this thread forthwith.

ABA - can you (in future) breakdown your fighters by their home nations (e.g. ENG, WAL, SCO) - just so I know.

I do know you that you follow that Amateur game religiously and know it inside out.... but on my one viewing of him, I think Matthew Maguire must be higher than that.

The guy looks like a world pro champion in the making. More impressed with him than Khan in 2004, I have to say.

Dioufy wrote:

Horse wrote:

Dioufy wrote:I would have Kevin Mitchell in at 10 or 11.

I think having Mitchell that high in the rankings would be very premature. If he beats Johanneson in March then he will enter the list, but certainly not that high.

He would enter the list? By that I have to assume that you leaving him out was no mistake then.

You assume correctly. I don't know why this is so surprising, he has not faced the best competition as of yet.

harrygreb wrote:ok, as i asked the question about rees ability against that of khan and lynes and you so wisely answered "yes", i take my leave of this thread forthwith.

Khan and Lynes are no supermen. I don't know why you have such a problem with me ranking an undefeated WBA champion above those two.

Do you think that Rees stands no chance against either of these two?

I would have Rees ahead of both Lynes and Khan on achivement (neither have beaten an M'Baye who regardless of his performance in their fight is fringe world class).

If they were to fight i'd back Khan and Lynes confidently.

ok, stop! its now time for the originator of the thread to establish the meaning of P4P. who is higher in the all time P4P rankings, marciano or ray robinson?
i always thought to get to the P4P top you had to assess the fighters overall prowess and all round ability not the fact that they might have won a world or any other title. so charley burley can never feature in an all time P4P list can he?