Page 1 of 1
Out with the old - in with the new!!!
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 14:26
by Spud
Mr W arren's stable of boxers:
Who are his elite boxers:
Who are his Chief Support boxers:
Who are the ones to watch:
I will also ask is he as strong as ever:
Who could he sign:
Re: Out with the old - in with the new!!!
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 15:52
by stujones
Spud wrote:Mr W arren's stable of boxers:
Who are his elite boxers:
Who are his Chief Support boxers:
Who are the ones to watch:
I will also ask is he as strong as ever:
Who could he sign:
Well, of course there are 2 big world title fights coming up which will be critical... should Lockett and/or Arthur pull off the huge upset.
Main Eventers
Khan, Calzaghe (for the moment), Mitchell, Arthur,
Chief Support Boxers
Gavin Rees, Enzo Mac, Gary Lockett, Bradley Pryce, Ryan Rhodes, Heavyweights, host of others (Jennings, Minter, Small etc)
Ones to look out for.
Tony Doherty, Anthony Small, Anderson, Kell Brook.
Who should he sign?
Mmm... Interesting.. Well of course, he could try and get a piece of Haye. There are not too many prospects out there - on a world wide scale... let alone domestically. Paul Appleby could provide some excitement. I'd love to see Guzman fight here more often (or just fight more often). Any chance Valero could get a licence here?
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 16:39
by The Law
He should keep an eye on the Beijing Olympics and target the likes of Frankie Gavin & Co.
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 16:42
by Maelstrom
Stu.. are you being serious about Anthony Small? I thought that myth had been well and truly shattered.
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 16:54
by sweetscience
he will get all the elite squad am's that he wants
smith, gavin, degale etc etc
plus he has bellew who will be one to watch soon
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 17:30
by Loynesy
Frank's done a great job recently (and as someone that criticised him relentlessly, that's a real volte-face), he's always paid his fighters well and the normal tendency for fighters who leave him, is to believe like Hamed and Hatton is that they no longer need him - probably right in Ricky's case.
Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 17:43
by twenty six
Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 17:49
by stujones
Maelstrom wrote:Stu.. are you being serious about Anthony Small? I thought that myth had been well and truly shattered.
People were saying this about David Haye after Thompson.
Personally, I don't think he can.... but he is a talent and I don't think should be written off completely.
Posted: 22 Apr 2008, 19:43
by Gray-Fox
Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Posted: 23 Apr 2008, 04:43
by Old bones Ian
Gray-Fox wrote:Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.
Posted: 23 Apr 2008, 08:14
by Twinkle Toes
I hear Hobson is kicking out his old tea boy, and getting himself a new and improved version

Posted: 23 Apr 2008, 08:18
by DavidPayne
He's complained of strained relations with his tea-boy who he insists is simply a mug, in a mug's game. He doesn't care if the new recruit is black, white or earl gray as long as he can boil a kettle. The notion Spud could apply is a saucer of much laughter.
Posted: 23 Apr 2008, 10:07
by Chambers2
Anyone know if any of the top class British amateurs will turn pro after Beijing or will they hang on for the glory of 2012?
Posted: 23 Apr 2008, 13:03
by Spud
twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
Mr Beagleboys,
My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.
With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;
Mr Twinkle Toes,
Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.
Payne,
You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
Posted: 24 Apr 2008, 05:08
by twenty six
Maybe I've misread your thread Spud.
If I have then sorry.
I read your intention being to demonstrate his stable was in decline with certain high profile losses and elite fighters at the end of the road.
My point was simply that other UK Promotors are in the same situation but that Warren's position is stronger than the others.
If Clinton does retire then who headlines for Dennis ?
If Froch loses who headlines for Hennessy ?
On the subject of Clinton, I am waiting to hear the outcome of these blood tests.
If they prove Clinton had a strain of meningitis in him when he fought it explains his apparent lethargy.
Heard anything ?
Posted: 24 Apr 2008, 05:24
by DavidPayne
Spud wrote:twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
Mr Beagleboys,
My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.
With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;
Mr Twinkle Toes,
Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.
Payne,
You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
Have you just thrown half-time tea cups around the dressing room?
Get over yourself Spud.
Posted: 24 Apr 2008, 07:44
by Tykemania
Old bones Ian wrote:Gray-Fox wrote:Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.
I don't think there's much issue about the money - Warren is pretty good for the fighters, except in the sense that he tries ever so hard to keep them out of competitive match ups wherever possible!
Posted: 24 Apr 2008, 07:48
by Lenny
Chambers2 wrote:Anyone know if any of the top class British amateurs will turn pro after Beijing or will they hang on for the glory of 2012?
I think this is a good point, whilst there will always be the big money to be made turning pro, I can see a fair few of this years Olympians waiting for 2012 and the chance to win gold in London