Out with the old - in with the new!!!

Post Reply
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Out with the old - in with the new!!!

Post by Spud »

Mr W arren's stable of boxers:

Who are his elite boxers:

Who are his Chief Support boxers:

Who are the ones to watch:

I will also ask is he as strong as ever:

Who could he sign:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Out with the old - in with the new!!!

Post by stujones »

Spud wrote:Mr W arren's stable of boxers:

Who are his elite boxers:

Who are his Chief Support boxers:

Who are the ones to watch:

I will also ask is he as strong as ever:

Who could he sign:
Well, of course there are 2 big world title fights coming up which will be critical... should Lockett and/or Arthur pull off the huge upset.

Main Eventers
Khan, Calzaghe (for the moment), Mitchell, Arthur,

Chief Support Boxers
Gavin Rees, Enzo Mac, Gary Lockett, Bradley Pryce, Ryan Rhodes, Heavyweights, host of others (Jennings, Minter, Small etc)

Ones to look out for.
Tony Doherty, Anthony Small, Anderson, Kell Brook.

Who should he sign?
Mmm... Interesting.. Well of course, he could try and get a piece of Haye. There are not too many prospects out there - on a world wide scale... let alone domestically. Paul Appleby could provide some excitement. I'd love to see Guzman fight here more often (or just fight more often). Any chance Valero could get a licence here?
The Law
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1948
Joined: 19 Feb 2005, 19:02

Post by The Law »

He should keep an eye on the Beijing Olympics and target the likes of Frankie Gavin & Co.
Maelstrom
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 425
Joined: 30 Nov 2007, 19:05

Post by Maelstrom »

Stu.. are you being serious about Anthony Small? I thought that myth had been well and truly shattered.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Post by sweetscience »

he will get all the elite squad am's that he wants

smith, gavin, degale etc etc

plus he has bellew who will be one to watch soon
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Post by Loynesy »

Frank's done a great job recently (and as someone that criticised him relentlessly, that's a real volte-face), he's always paid his fighters well and the normal tendency for fighters who leave him, is to believe like Hamed and Hatton is that they no longer need him - probably right in Ricky's case.

Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Post by twenty six »

Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Maelstrom wrote:Stu.. are you being serious about Anthony Small? I thought that myth had been well and truly shattered.
People were saying this about David Haye after Thompson.

Personally, I don't think he can.... but he is a talent and I don't think should be written off completely.
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Post by Gray-Fox »

Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Post by Old bones Ian »

Gray-Fox wrote:
Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3340
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Post by Twinkle Toes »

I hear Hobson is kicking out his old tea boy, and getting himself a new and improved version :lol:
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

He's complained of strained relations with his tea-boy who he insists is simply a mug, in a mug's game. He doesn't care if the new recruit is black, white or earl gray as long as he can boil a kettle. The notion Spud could apply is a saucer of much laughter.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Post by Chambers2 »

Anyone know if any of the top class British amateurs will turn pro after Beijing or will they hang on for the glory of 2012?
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by Spud »

twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
Mr Beagleboys,

My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.

With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;

Mr Twinkle Toes,

Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.

Payne,

You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Post by twenty six »

Maybe I've misread your thread Spud.
If I have then sorry.
I read your intention being to demonstrate his stable was in decline with certain high profile losses and elite fighters at the end of the road.
My point was simply that other UK Promotors are in the same situation but that Warren's position is stronger than the others.
If Clinton does retire then who headlines for Dennis ?
If Froch loses who headlines for Hennessy ?
On the subject of Clinton, I am waiting to hear the outcome of these blood tests.
If they prove Clinton had a strain of meningitis in him when he fought it explains his apparent lethargy.
Heard anything ?
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Post by DavidPayne »

Spud wrote:
twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
Mr Beagleboys,

My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.

With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;

Mr Twinkle Toes,

Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.

Payne,

You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
Have you just thrown half-time tea cups around the dressing room?

Get over yourself Spud.
Tykemania
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 540
Joined: 15 Nov 2007, 20:22

Post by Tykemania »

Old bones Ian wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:
Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
By and large, this is spot on.
Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.
I don't think there's much issue about the money - Warren is pretty good for the fighters, except in the sense that he tries ever so hard to keep them out of competitive match ups wherever possible!
Lenny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3656
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 05:31

Post by Lenny »

Chambers2 wrote:Anyone know if any of the top class British amateurs will turn pro after Beijing or will they hang on for the glory of 2012?
I think this is a good point, whilst there will always be the big money to be made turning pro, I can see a fair few of this years Olympians waiting for 2012 and the chance to win gold in London
Post Reply