Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:01
You joined in 2005.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:01
More pertinently, why are you reading the earliest threads? Saddo.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:04
Wasn't it how Steve Bunce described us at the time? How far have you gone back?
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:07
Does a bear shit in the woods? Is Steve Bunce a nobhead?Terry D wrote:2004 I think. I think I recalled the term used in Boxing Monthly years ago as well 'Internet train spotters in press row' type thing.
Are we geeks?
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:22
My missus accuses me of being a bad nerd for going on to boxrec but it’s the typical problem for most fans of marginalised sports: most of my mates love to watch a fight, most of them train in boxing/kickboxing or some other combat sport, and all love to stay up all night boozing for a big fight from the US, but most only have a fairly superficial knowledge of the sport (think Spud 
).
For that reason I am forced to come on somewhere like here to discuss the merits, or otherwise, of regional undercard fighters and other nuances of the sport that most of my pals just couldn’t give a fook about.
Any internet forum is going to have its ‘anorak’ element, but needs must.
By the way, I think it was Frank Maloney who used to give out about boxing forum members being anoraks.
).For that reason I am forced to come on somewhere like here to discuss the merits, or otherwise, of regional undercard fighters and other nuances of the sport that most of my pals just couldn’t give a fook about.
Any internet forum is going to have its ‘anorak’ element, but needs must.
By the way, I think it was Frank Maloney who used to give out about boxing forum members being anoraks.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:23
I think we are, but I don't care. We're such a minority nowadays that it's hard to have a decent conversation with someone about boxing.MatthewS wrote:Does a bear shit in the woods? Is Steve Bunce a nobhead?Terry D wrote:2004 I think. I think I recalled the term used in Boxing Monthly years ago as well 'Internet train spotters in press row' type thing.
Are we geeks?
Posted: 02 May 2008, 09:55
[quote="Terry D]I sometimes sneak off upstairs and my girlfriend asks what the score is so I tell her I'm sending an email and she'll ask if someone on a forum is discussing there most 'favoured boring fights ever' and I just have to give my opinion (Harrison-Williams I, naturally).[/quote]
Mate, I actually paid money to go to that, and Skelton v Sprott 2. What a twat!
Mate, I actually paid money to go to that, and Skelton v Sprott 2. What a twat!
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:00
Fcuk em. I heard that Abrams is no fan of the 'Net crowd, but so what? by going to the fights and buying his mag we keep him in beer and sweets. They shouldnt think they can piss us off.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:00
For the Harrison fight, alot of the punters fcked off to the Spearmint Rhino, as they were handing out flyers. 
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:01
I post on boxrec because I have an inbuilt calling deep inside of me to educate the masses. I'd like to take this moment to thank Boxrec and all the posters who have read my high-intellect prophecies on Our sport for allowing me to quench that desire by accepting the knowledge of which I have fed you 
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:02
Chambers2 wrote:I post on boxrec because I have an inbuilt calling deep inside of me to educate the masses. I'd like to take this moment to thank Boxrec and all the posters who have read my high-intellect prophecies on Our sport for allowing me to quench that desire by accepting the knowledge of which I have fed you
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:08
I think I packed too much in to my Friday lunchtime JMatthewS wrote:Chambers2 wrote:I post on boxrec because I have an inbuilt calling deep inside of me to educate the masses. I'd like to take this moment to thank Boxrec and all the posters who have read my high-intellect prophecies on Our sport for allowing me to quench that desire by accepting the knowledge of which I have fed you
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:09
See you in 30 DaysTerry D wrote:I'm sorry, have you only just joined?Chambers2 wrote:I post on boxrec because I have an inbuilt calling deep inside of me to educate the masses. I'd like to take this moment to thank Boxrec and all the posters who have read my high-intellect prophecies on Our sport for allowing me to quench that desire by accepting the knowledge of which I have fed you
Anyway, question answered, we're sad bastards and proud of it. I'm taking a month off.
Sam, my phone is Ok now. I will text you at 3am this morning, it won't make sense.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:22
I prefer the term 'Anorak'.
'Trainspotting forum' makes us sound like a group of Junkies discussing our favourite film.
'Trainspotting forum' makes us sound like a group of Junkies discussing our favourite film.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:24
Yeah and me, that's one of Frank Maloneys terms for usOld bones Ian wrote:I prefer the term 'Anorak'.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 10:29
I remember the mental midget once dismissing us all as anoraks.
But I think it mainly stemmed from when Dogmess was very popular and because most of us couldn't tolerate the level of debate on there, boxrec was given this tag.
But I think it mainly stemmed from when Dogmess was very popular and because most of us couldn't tolerate the level of debate on there, boxrec was given this tag.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 11:44
Yes i think we are generally referred to as the nerds of the boxing world but as Matthew S rightly points out, the nerds buy the fight tickets, PPV's and magazines so they should tread a wee bit more carefully.
Internet writing has improved a great deal too in recent years and we are of course in a minority sport. How many times have you met someone who says "Yeah i love Boxing" and your sudden tinge of excitement is dampened after you mention a couple of names off the mainstream and they look at you like your...well...a member of the Boxrec Internet Forum.
Internet writing has improved a great deal too in recent years and we are of course in a minority sport. How many times have you met someone who says "Yeah i love Boxing" and your sudden tinge of excitement is dampened after you mention a couple of names off the mainstream and they look at you like your...well...a member of the Boxrec Internet Forum.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 12:00
I can see why people in the boxing business hate internet forums because us fans have a voice through it and can express our opinions whether they like them or not. I'm sure claude wasn't best pleased reading how he looked like a skeleton recently either!
I would rather be a "trainspotter" anyway, I need this site as I do struggle to talk boxing with someone whose limits are Calzaghe, Hatton and Khan.
I have one friend who I can talk about boxing with fully and he posts on here, and one or two who go slightly beyond the mainstream stuff but that is it.
I would rather be a "trainspotter" anyway, I need this site as I do struggle to talk boxing with someone whose limits are Calzaghe, Hatton and Khan.
I have one friend who I can talk about boxing with fully and he posts on here, and one or two who go slightly beyond the mainstream stuff but that is it.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 12:05
Do you reckon he actually reads this site then?Neri wrote:I can see why people in the boxing business hate internet forums because us fans have a voice through it and can express our opinions whether they like them or not. I'm sure claude wasn't best pleased reading how he looked like a skeleton recently either!
I would rather be a "trainspotter" anyway, I need this site as I do struggle to talk boxing with someone whose limits are Calzaghe, Hatton and Khan.
I have one friend who I can talk about boxing with fully and he posts on here, and one or two who go slightly beyond the mainstream stuff but that is it.
What annoys me is when some of the 'insiders' on here get all snotty when we comment on matters that we should apparently leave to them - mismatches, conduct of stewards at fights, etc etc. We all know who they are.
They should also remember who ultimately funds the sport they try to run as a business.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 12:17
I think most within the sport do. It concerns them, getting a feel for what the fans are saying must inspire a few articles here and there otherwise how would they know what the real fans want? It's all research.MatthewS wrote:Do you reckon he actually reads this site then?Neri wrote:I can see why people in the boxing business hate internet forums because us fans have a voice through it and can express our opinions whether they like them or not. I'm sure claude wasn't best pleased reading how he looked like a skeleton recently either!
I would rather be a "trainspotter" anyway, I need this site as I do struggle to talk boxing with someone whose limits are Calzaghe, Hatton and Khan.
I have one friend who I can talk about boxing with fully and he posts on here, and one or two who go slightly beyond the mainstream stuff but that is it.
What annoys me is when some of the 'insiders' on here get all snotty when we comment on matters that we should apparently leave to them - mismatches, conduct of stewards at fights, etc etc. We all know who they are.
They should also remember who ultimately funds the sport they try to run as a business.
It annoys me too. Everyone has an opinion and whether we have ever met so and so is irrelevant. If I have viewed a fighter I can say what I think is good or bad about him, regardless if i'm wrong or not.
I hate boxing the business. Love boxing the sport.
Posted: 02 May 2008, 12:19
Like the Royal Antedulivian Order of Buffaloes.... :)Terry D wrote:I try not toTerribleTerry wrote:My missus accuses me of being a bad nerd for going on to boxrec but it’s the typical problem for most fans of marginalised sports: most of my mates love to watch a fight, most of them train in boxing/kickboxing or some other combat sport, and all love to stay up all night boozing for a big fight from the US, but most only have a fairly superficial knowledge of the sport (think Spud
For that reason I am forced to come on somewhere like here to discuss the merits, or otherwise, of regional undercard fighters and other nuances of the sport that most of my pals just couldn’t give a fook about.
Any internet forum is going to have its ‘anorak’ element, but needs must.
By the way, I think it was Frank Maloney who used to give out about boxing forum members being anoraks.
I sometimes sneak off upstairs and my girlfriend asks what the score is so I tell her I'm sending an email and she'll ask if someone on a forum is discussing there most 'favoured boring fights ever' and I just have to give my opinion (Harrison-Williams I, naturally).
I used to get a bunch of guys round for the fights but cannot be arsed these days, my girlfriend watches them with me, and is pretty damn good at reading a fight, and football matches, it is scarey. She maintains I'm a geek though, but her going on AOL chatrooms under a false name insulting people was just dandy!
I was surprised to read Boxrec described as the train spotting forum but I guess many other forums, especially US ones, seem to be full of people posing that eternal question: "Are you a knobhead?", "No, you are a knobhead". I'll take it as a refection of the fact we are a well-mannered bunch on here, plus the trolls have gone.
Saying that I'm taking a month off Boxrec after today. So I can then look at myself as a non-Geek, for a while at least.
Capthook called Boxrec the 'home of the Internet boxing masons', in a good sense
Posted: 02 May 2008, 12:21
I think Maloney called boxrec or ESB annoraks or train spotters, I forget which
Posted: 02 May 2008, 13:17
The word Maloney used about us internet forum chaps is Anoraks!!!
Him and other promoters read these forums more than we do!!!
If they didn't I wouldn't get as many threatening phone calls and letters!!!
Him and other promoters read these forums more than we do!!!
If they didn't I wouldn't get as many threatening phone calls and letters!!!
Re: Why Train Spotters?
Posted: 02 May 2008, 13:24
Terry D wrote: Probably not a good reason for a thread.
Never stopped you in the past!
Re: Why Train Spotters?
Posted: 02 May 2008, 13:25
DG ask the forum if he's funnyDG. wrote:Terry D wrote: Probably not a good reason for a thread.
Never stopped you in the past!
They said NO, NO, NO!