Weigh in - MEN Show
Weigh in - MEN Show
Khan, Prescott, Artur & Cook all made the weight.
Prescott definately has a size advantage, whether he can make the most of it remains to be seen.
Aud weighed in at 17 stone 2...
Prescott definately has a size advantage, whether he can make the most of it remains to be seen.
Aud weighed in at 17 stone 2...
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Khan weights 9,7.5
whats the super feather weight limit in stones ??
whats the super feather weight limit in stones ??
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
It's 9 stone 4 lbs. He's 3½ lbs away from Super Featherweight.sweetscience wrote:Khan weights 9,7.5
whats the super feather weight limit in stones ??
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
That's the lightest he's ever been as a pro by a good 5 lbs!JamesH wrote:Aud weighed in at 17 stone 2...
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
A Sky Sport journalist should understand that the plural of stone is exactly the same as the singular.Already with a considerable advantage in terms of reach, the gold medal winner in Sydney back in 2000 was over two stones heavier than his opponent.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
No more talk of Khan not being a Lightweight! He makes the weight comfortably enough.
And lets give credit where it is due... he might be fighting a sloth - but he is a BIG sloth.... who'd have thought you'd see Khan looking small at Lightweight.
And lets give credit where it is due... he might be fighting a sloth - but he is a BIG sloth.... who'd have thought you'd see Khan looking small at Lightweight.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Any photos?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Frank: "I'm not getting nervous."
Proof that Frank is getting nervous.
Proof that Frank is getting nervous.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Here's the first one I've found. Terrible quality though.jameswilson wrote:Any photos?

http://img.skysports.com/08/09/800x600/ ... 172038.jpg
Edit: Video here
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Watching the video the commentators got Audleys weight wrong. It was announced at 250lbs, which is actually 17stone 12, not 17stone 2.
-
kevin
- Heavyweight

Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
kevin wrote:Some shots from the weigh-in here
http://www.britishboxing.net/news_3766- ... -show.html

That's one to stick on the fireplace
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
God if Audley's pants get any smaller he'll be wearing a thong.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Boxing weigh ins
not gay in the slightest..
not gay in the slightest..
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
I enjoy the commentary of Paddy Crerand on MUTVAsterix wrote:A Sky Sport journalist should understand that the plural of stone is exactly the same as the singular.Already with a considerable advantage in terms of reach, the gold medal winner in Sydney back in 2000 was over two stones heavier than his opponent.
"Should have headered it there Wayne, should have headered it"
Then when they show the replay
"yep. Should have headered it"
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13411
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Boxing weigh ins
not gay in the slightest..
You would tho wouldn't you.