Page 1 of 1
Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 08:10
by JamesH
Khan, Prescott, Artur & Cook all made the weight.
Prescott definately has a size advantage, whether he can make the most of it remains to be seen.
Aud weighed in at 17 stone 2...
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:07
by sweetscience
Khan weights 9,7.5
whats the super feather weight limit in stones ??
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:09
by Asterix
sweetscience wrote:Khan weights 9,7.5
whats the super feather weight limit in stones ??
It's 9 stone 4 lbs. He's 3½ lbs away from Super Featherweight.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:12
by Asterix
JamesH wrote:Aud weighed in at 17 stone 2...
That's the lightest he's ever been as a pro by a good 5 lbs!
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:14
by Asterix
Already with a considerable advantage in terms of reach, the gold medal winner in Sydney back in 2000 was over two stones heavier than his opponent.
A Sky Sport journalist should understand that the plural of stone is exactly the same as the singular.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:48
by stujones
No more talk of Khan not being a Lightweight! He makes the weight comfortably enough.
And lets give credit where it is due... he might be fighting a sloth - but he is a BIG sloth.... who'd have thought you'd see Khan looking small at Lightweight.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:54
by jameswilson
Any photos?
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 09:59
by Bard of Boxrec
Frank: "I'm not getting nervous."
Proof that Frank is getting nervous.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 10:04
by JamesH
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 11:33
by Asterix
jameswilson wrote:Any photos?
Here's the first one I've found. Terrible quality though.
http://img.skysports.com/08/09/800x600/ ... 172038.jpg
Edit:
Video here
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 11:38
by jameswilson
Watching the video the commentators got Audleys weight wrong. It was announced at 250lbs, which is actually 17stone 12, not 17stone 2.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 12:57
by kevin
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 13:44
by Chambers2
That's one to stick on the fireplace
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 17:35
by emma
God if Audley's pants get any smaller he'll be wearing a thong.
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 17:57
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Boxing weigh ins
not gay in the slightest..
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 18:02
by Khaosai-Galaxy
Asterix wrote:Already with a considerable advantage in terms of reach, the gold medal winner in Sydney back in 2000 was over two stones heavier than his opponent.
A Sky Sport journalist should understand that the plural of stone is exactly the same as the singular.
I enjoy the commentary of Paddy Crerand on MUTV
"Should have headered it there Wayne, should have headered it"
Then when they show the replay
"yep. Should have headered it"
Re: Weigh in - MEN Show
Posted: 05 Sep 2008, 18:04
by jameswilson
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:Boxing weigh ins
not gay in the slightest..
You would tho wouldn't you.