Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

scartissue · Post by **scartissue** » 02 May 2003, 10:35

Cervantes by decision. Way too slick for an Arguello who stretched a bit too far out of his weight class. 140 was Cervantes territory and he had no peer at that weight. I do feel however, that Arguello would be there at the final bell.

TonyJ · Post by **TonyJ** » 05 May 2003, 01:16

I agree i think Arguello would make it to the final bell, but lose by UD.

Nile4000 · Post by **Nile4000** » 27 Aug 2012, 21:08

Arguello in over his head.Cervantes by clear UD.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 27 Aug 2012, 21:47

Agreed.

Sven Tingstrom · Post by **Sven Tingstrom** » 28 Aug 2012, 10:36

scartissue wrote:. . . Cervantes . . . had no peer at that weight.

LOL! What about Canzoneri, Ross, Carlos Ortiz, Aaron Pryor, Whittaker, de la Hoya, Tszyu, Kid Berg, Chavez?

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 28 Aug 2012, 14:42

Never heard of Canzeroni.:)

BoxBuzz · Post by **BoxBuzz** » 28 Aug 2012, 16:33

Cervantes would have been too much for Pryor or Arugello prime for prime.

Rover · Post by **Rover** » 28 Aug 2012, 18:06

BoxBuzz wrote:Cervantes would have been too much for Pryor or Arugello prime for prime.

What about Benitez?

Sven Tingstrom · Post by **Sven Tingstrom** » 30 Aug 2012, 17:55

Rover wrote:Never heard of Canzeroni.:)

Sorry, English isn't even my first language, much less Italian. No Canzeronis or Canzoneris in Sweden.

Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Cervantes-Arguello

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Re: Cervantes-Arguello

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)

Re: Alexis Arguello vs Antonio Cervantes (at jw)