I've just watched a preview of the Joe Calzaghes interview that's about to be shown on the Excellent Steve Bunces Boxing Hour (Setanta news channel at 2 pm, with repeats on Setanta 2 at 7pm and Setanta 1 at 10pm, no doubt on youtube as well at some point).
In the interview Calzaghe says that wins over the likes of Froch and Dawson mean nothing and they wouldn't add nothing to his legacy because they haven't done anything yet, but I'm presuming that he thinks that a win over a 39 year old shot Roy Jones does mean something! In my eyes the win over RJJ does very little to his legacy as RJJ is obviously a shadow of the fighter he was. If JC would have beat him in 2000-2002 when they SHOULD have fought each other, then it would have been a Legendary result, but JC was too busy fighting Tocker Pudwill, Jiminez, Brewer, McIntyre, Veit).
Froch and Chad Dawson haven't got the BIG names on their records YET, but both fighters will go on to do well in the sport imo, so if Calzaghe was to to beat them the result would look alot better in 5 years time, it would obviously add to his legacy then. If Eubank would have beat Calzaghe then it wouldn't have added to Chris's legacy at the time, but it certainly would have done now.
Looking forward to seeing the Calzaghe interview in an hours time, he's supposed to share his thoughts on Carl Froch....... so no doubt I'll be back on this thread a few hours time
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)