Should the BBBoC step in.

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by stujones »

Okay, so we have all had a go at Warren - I think its only fair that other promoters should get criticism when it is due.

I have no problems with the main event and chief support on Sky's Friday Night bill.

But really - should the world class Ajose Olusegun be allowed to fight someone with a 1-3-1 record! over 8 rounds.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

I've written to the board on a couple of occasions about what i consider mismatches, and have never recieved a reply.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by leforge »

Thats terrible, should not be approved.
standing8
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 206
Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 16:37

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by standing8 »

There's nothing worse in boxing,than poorly matched shows ie home fighters V Birmingham loosers (Sorry Mr nobb's)
The BBBOC should introduce a seeding/rank system to be placed on promotional fight posters,then the paying public would be able to judge if fights are fairly matched.

Cos this seems the norm

Home fighter 8-0 (ranked 25/75) V Away fighter 10-3-111 (ranked 70/75) X 5 fights

No i wouldn't pay £ for this !!!!!
Abbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 699
Joined: 02 Jun 2005, 16:36

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Abbo »

I know this might seem mad, but he's not that bad actually. I saw him fight last month and he beat Ryan Barrett IMHO.

However, Olusegun does have some thunder so it could end up looking terrible.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by DavidPayne »

Look who Clinton fought before Jones Jnr.

His record was, from memory 8-9 at the time.
kevin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by kevin »

stujones wrote:Okay, so we have all had a go at Warren - I think its only fair that other promoters should get criticism when it is due.

I have no problems with the main event and chief support on Sky's Friday Night bill.

But really - should the world class Ajose Olusegun be allowed to fight someone with a 1-3-1 record! over 8 rounds.
Giovanni Frontin lost to Frankie Gavin in the final of the Commonwealth Games in 2006, he's better than his record suggests.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

I'm never keen on that saying 'he's better than his record suggests', because he's not, he may be a decent boxer, but the record doesn't lie. He doesn't win.

sorry just something that bugs me.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by twenty six »

Well I witnessed the bloodbath against Spitko, who was 4-4 at the time, so if that's anything to go by then yes it seems a weird marking time decision to put this kid in.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

can you name Frontin's more famous family member?
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by twenty six »

Haven't got a clue - but I'm sure Jamie Sanigar will know.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Counter-puncher »

Old bones Ian wrote:I've written to the board on a couple of occasions about what i consider mismatches, and have never recieved a reply.
i did it a couple of times, i got a reply but it was kindof mealy-mouthed
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

The one i wrote about was the Ryan Rhodes v Olufemi Moses mismatch.
which is much like the proposed Olusegun v Frontin match.

An established boxer versus a decent amateur with not much pro experience.

Rhodes won in 2 rounds.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by stujones »

I think a worry for me is that it is a scheduled 8 rounder, what happens if Frontin can take a whack - he could get really damaged over 8 rounds. Frontin at the moment should only be involved in 4/6 rounders.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by twenty six »

Old Bones,
That's a bit insular, isolating that Rhodes fight.
Look a bit closer "darn sarth" mate, and select from numerous on the Kevin Mitchell slate as an example ! :wink: :TU:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

Don't worry twenty six, i did email my concerns about one of kevin mitchells opponents last year, but luckily that fight didn't go ahead.

It wasn't anything to do with Rhodes being north of Watford, the Moses fight was a mismatch.
and i think the Olusegun v Frontin is one as well.
twenty six
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3574
Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by twenty six »

Not for a minute concerned Ian.
I think if we all applied our minds to the subject the list would be extensive.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26443
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by banjo »

When I see the term mismatch I always think of those poor guys who were thrown in against a prime Chavez when he decide he wanted to make a quick buck in between world title fights :D
Abbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 699
Joined: 02 Jun 2005, 16:36

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Abbo »

I got involved when Esra Sellars was going to be served up to Enzo. Got a very good response from Simon Block, and naturally assume their subsequent decision not to sanction the bout was 100% down to me :TU:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

Thing with these types of matches is every now and again one of the underdogs puts in a decent display , or goes the distance.
So the board seem to forget about the times when we have quick KO's , and glorified sparring sessions.

The BBBoC are for me , the premier boxing ruling body, but it doesn't mean they get it right all the time.
Jamie Sanigar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 225
Joined: 25 Feb 2005, 13:12

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Jamie Sanigar »

I can understand peoples concerns with this contest because on paper it certainly looks a mismatch but that certainly was not the case. We felt he had a chance and we certainly do our homework to ensure that there is as little chance as possible of our boxer being seriously hurt. I was not there to see the fight last night but my father Chris said it was a competitive and entertaining fight and was closer than the scoring suggests (60-55).

If you look closer at Frontin's record you can see he beat Ben Murphy who recently beat Celtic Champ Gary Buckland. He lost by one point to Spitko when a slip was counted as a knockdown losing him the fight. He had Scott Lawton in lots of trouble and Lawton admitted he could not remember the last round. He lost by one point to Nicki Smedley had him on the floor and in trouble. Drew with Ryan Barrett when everyone in the arena said he won the fight, Barrett is now challenging for the English Title. Even though his record is a losing one he has boxed in top company early on in his career, comes to win and is learning all the time.

Be good to hear the views of anyone who was at York Hall last night to see it?
gkt999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 488
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 17:16

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by gkt999 »

Funny how the BoxRec forum memebrs disagree with some of the mismatches and the BBBoC actually tell promoters/matchmakers to use the BoxRec boxer records / results section when filling in the application forms for these fights to be santioned. Prehaps we should add a big notice to the boxers results pages once we hear a whisper of possible mismatches lol.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Old bones Ian »

I can see what your saying Jamie, unfortunatly i didn't see the fight so cannot comment on it.
And i've no doubt that you think Frontin is a decent boxer, so where do you go from here with him?
Just keep putting him in with a higher class of boxer, or try and build him up into a boxer capable of competing for titles?

Its not a critisism , i'm just interested in how the boxers see themselves as well.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by steve689 »

Maloney has previous form in this area. In 2006, 23-0 Gary Woolcombe beat 1-4 Alex Stoda via DQ in Barnsley. It's getting like Australia; where's the WBF when you need them!
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: Should the BBBoC step in.

Post by Gray-Fox »

Did this happen then?
Post Reply