WBC v Manny Pac

Post Reply
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

WBC v Manny Pac

Post by chinny »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7713001.stm

Strange and amusing. Why would Manny not pay the fees?

I love the daft quotes Sulaiman comes out with. He became famous fighting WBC champions! Like if there wasn't a WBC he'd be a nobody. Priceless
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by Max Molyneux »

Well having belts like the WBC and IBF gave him the opportunities to become the big star he Is now though but this Is BS still. Why would he have to pay them for a non title fight? The state athletic commission can sanction referees and such anyway,
chinny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1536
Joined: 18 Jun 2007, 09:33

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by chinny »

I think it must refer to fees payable for the Diaz fight not the Oscar fight

I guess Manny is beyond caring now but if he gets a beating from Oscar (hope not) at least the WBC 135 belt gives him more leverage for the next fight.

I'd love to see him fight Valero
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Max Molyneux wrote:Well having belts like the WBC and IBF gave him the opportunities to become the big star he Is now though but this Is BS still. Why would he have to pay them for a non title fight? The state athletic commission can sanction referees and such anyway,
Manny doesn't need belts any more - he's bigger than the sanctioning bodies and they know it. That's why they tried to screw him, if he dumps the belt, they can make coin without risking the belt becoming unified, which is a real pain for them as there are going to be fewer defences.

Stuff Suliaman, the fat penguin lookalike.
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by Datsue »

Have I missed something? Is this dosh owed from the Diaz fight or simply Jose trying to ring a bit more pocket money out of Pac-Man for a non-title fight?

Anyway, the word is Valero's fighting Mexican Antonio Pitalua for Manny's belt (oh, sorry, the interim versh), so why would Pacquiao want to pony up to keep something they're about to strip him of anyway?

Maybe they'll promote the DLH fight as being for the WBC Youth Interim Division-Jumping Title.
EddieShredder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by EddieShredder »

Sulaiman is a prick. Despite it's stature, the WBC is just as corrupt as any governing body.....
Billy_Boy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 43
Joined: 07 Sep 2008, 14:36

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by Billy_Boy »

"The WBC is also insisting Pacquiao pays $100,000 (£63,000) within 15 days of his next fight, a non-title affair against Oscar De Le Hoya on 6 December, or face the same punishment."

How would that stick, seeing as it is not (to the best of my knowledge) a WBC sanctioned fight??
whatashambles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 668
Joined: 14 Nov 2006, 13:30

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by whatashambles »

They want money off Pavlik as well.
bobcat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: WBC v Manny Pac

Post by bobcat »

Datsue wrote:Have I missed something? Is this dosh owed from the Diaz fight or simply Jose trying to ring a bit more pocket money out of Pac-Man for a non-title fight?

Anyway, the word is Valero's fighting Mexican Antonio Pitalua for Manny's belt (oh, sorry, the interim versh), so why would Pacquiao want to pony up to keep something they're about to strip him of anyway?

Maybe they'll promote the DLH fight as being for the WBC Youth Interim Division-Jumping Title.
you know the truely sad part Datsue? i bet you any money bout 5-10 years from now,that that belt will actually exist.

and im not even kidding.
Post Reply