Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Matthew won a UD 98-92x2 and 97-93
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
how did all your ppl score the fight???
i think the sky sports guys (watt and darke) had it perfect with 96-94 to hatton.....6-4 in rounds
i think the sky sports guys (watt and darke) had it perfect with 96-94 to hatton.....6-4 in rounds
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
I only saw bits and pieces of the fight, but Hatton looked good. I saw him land some nice punches.
Re: The Official Well Done Mathew Hatton thread
I thought He looked Terriffic well done His Team great job.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
blegh, wrong thread
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
wrong thread
Last edited by Wales on 24 Nov 2008, 09:51, edited 1 time in total.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
thank god i couldnt bet on this. This would have been my biggest gambling loss ever...Tackie must have really declined, no?
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Coco wrote:Matthew won a UD 98-92x2 and 97-93
Tell Jackthehat what a spoiler is!
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: The Official Well Done Mathew Hatton thread
jackthehat wrote:yeahDG. wrote:Every heard of a SPOILER?
Try using one, they are great for fans who plan on watching it somewhere else later.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Jack, as horse would say "you should be ashamed of yourself"
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: The Official Well Done Mathew Hatton thread
I agree, but some do view the forums after a fight, most use SPOILERS though.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Excellent display from Matthew, looked sharp and his hand speed seemed to be a good bit quicker. Is Floyd handling his day to day stuff - he wasn't in the corner, but he seems to have benefited alot from the new change.
Actually did a better job, albeit against an older version, of Tackie than his brother did.
Actually did a better job, albeit against an older version, of Tackie than his brother did.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Jack glad someone else picked up on it, when He throws his right you noticed yes.
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
It was seen as a risky fight for Matt but Matt did a superb job and won well. He will have bags of confidence now when he returns to the domestic scene.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
I thought Tackie looked very poor, didn't get his shots off at all. To give Hatton credit, that was undoubtedly partially due to his movement and activity but I don't think you can compare the 35y.o. Tackie to the one that fought his brother.Riddick Blowe wrote:Tackie must have really declined, no?
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Even so Baboon , there were new ideas there I was impressed.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
The commentators said that Lee Beard is Matthew Hatton's trainer. I'd assume Mayweather Sr is only with Ricky.stujones wrote:Excellent display from Matthew, looked sharp and his hand speed seemed to be a good bit quicker. Is Floyd handling his day to day stuff - he wasn't in the corner, but he seems to have benefited alot from the new change.
Actually did a better job, albeit against an older version, of Tackie than his brother did.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Beard doing a good job, Mathew is improving, some lovely touches there last night.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: The Official Well Done Mathew Hatton thread
Agree completely. Almost every time there's a fight on tape delay, you get somebody crowing about the result being revealed on here. Well, get a clue! If you want to avoid a boxing result, don't visit a boxing site! But now it's gone a stage further and we suddenly have to label LIVE televised fights with "spoiler". WTF...sg1985 wrote:maybe a boxing forum isnt the place to go to avoid finding out fight results
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
People should be able to check the boxing forum without the concern of spoilers in titles. That said, I don't answer the phone, remove the radio from the gym and hide in my flat until I've watched it. But I'm less of a daredevil.
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Good result on paper, improved level of boxing from him.
But Tackie's a light welter, Hatton is a guy who fights OVER the welter limit. He was considerably the bigger man in there and Tackie has seen better days. Felt that they were taking a leaf out of Oscar and even Ricky (get me Pac, get me Marquez) Hatton book, i.e. a name is a name, who cares if the opponent is smaller, it will still make you look better.
If I am exaggerating the size difference between Matton & Tackie please feel free to object.
I reckon an out of the ordinary style will always cause him great trouble. If guys like Brook, Watson (who already beat Matton) are the Br/Cw champs, then I don't see him getting a belt.
But Tackie's a light welter, Hatton is a guy who fights OVER the welter limit. He was considerably the bigger man in there and Tackie has seen better days. Felt that they were taking a leaf out of Oscar and even Ricky (get me Pac, get me Marquez) Hatton book, i.e. a name is a name, who cares if the opponent is smaller, it will still make you look better.
If I am exaggerating the size difference between Matton & Tackie please feel free to object.
I reckon an out of the ordinary style will always cause him great trouble. If guys like Brook, Watson (who already beat Matton) are the Br/Cw champs, then I don't see him getting a belt.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Anyone think the judging was bullshit? Tackie won AT LEAST 4 rounds, clearly the judges knew who their pay masters were and took no chances. I don't object to Matthew getting the W (although it could easily have been a draw) but the judging was well off and if Hatton had fought shit and managed to lose to Malignaggi on a fair persons card (I had him winning every round) I'm sure he would have got the verdict. I HATE BOXING CORRUPTION ![[icon_witsend.gif] :witzend:](./images/smilies/icon_witsend.gif)
That aside good boxing display by Matthew, but I can't see him going near Kell Brook, he'd get massacred
That aside good boxing display by Matthew, but I can't see him going near Kell Brook, he'd get massacred
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
I just can't see that fight being made - Warren fighter v Punch Promotions - unless of course its a purse bids situation.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:That aside good boxing display by Matthew, but I can't see him going near Kell Brook, he'd get massacred
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Matthew Hatton Spoiler
Maybe Warren would be tempted knowing Matthew would get smashedSpud wrote:I just can't see that fight being made - Warren fighter v Punch Promotions - unless of course its a purse bids situation.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:That aside good boxing display by Matthew, but I can't see him going near Kell Brook, he'd get massacred