Is the WBO slipping in status?
Is the WBO slipping in status?
I'm just wondering- some of the WBO "world" title fights seem to be pushing it a bit. How is it regarded in the States? I know some American magazines were in the habit of only listing IBF, WBC and WBA champions as "World" Champions.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
I don't think it's status has changed. Pervesely I reckon it has benefitted from the ineptitude of the other alphabets (WBC near bankrupcy; IBF bung scandal; WBA super dupa shambles and more) so that they are all more or less equally derided.
At a stretch though I would still probably say the WBC is the best and WBO worst of the big 4, for what its worth
At a stretch though I would still probably say the WBC is the best and WBO worst of the big 4, for what its worth
-
El Raincoat
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 790
- Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
Well there all as bad as each other i only pay attention to the WBC/WBA/IBF & WBO The Ring is kinda like the lineal champ but the IBO, WBF, WBU are rubbish wouldn't give them an kudos at all.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
Ring belt worth more than each of them on there own IMO.
It's status seems to be growing monthly at the mo.
It's status seems to be growing monthly at the mo.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
The IBO is doing quite well, I think. Their Champions (from Heavyweight down to Lightweight):
Wladimir Klitschko
Johnathon Banks
Chad Dawson
Sakio Bika
Daniel Geale
Ricky Hatton
Juan Diaz
Below Lightweight the quality drops off a bit, I think. Though Flyweight champ Nonito Donaire definitely deserves a mention. Minimumweight champ might be good, Nkosinathi Joyi, but I don't know anything about him other than what's on his record.
Wladimir Klitschko
Johnathon Banks
Chad Dawson
Sakio Bika
Daniel Geale
Ricky Hatton
Juan Diaz
Below Lightweight the quality drops off a bit, I think. Though Flyweight champ Nonito Donaire definitely deserves a mention. Minimumweight champ might be good, Nkosinathi Joyi, but I don't know anything about him other than what's on his record.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
The WBO is a joke but these days the other 3 aren't much better.
The WBA is responsible for sanctioning the one-sided Cotto-Gomez fight
The WBC and WBO sanctioned arguarbly the mismatch of the year in Pavlik-Lockett
And the IBF is still a strip-happy organisation.
I bet there's many more boxing atrocities that I don't know about that these lot are responsible for.
The WBA is responsible for sanctioning the one-sided Cotto-Gomez fight
The WBC and WBO sanctioned arguarbly the mismatch of the year in Pavlik-Lockett
And the IBF is still a strip-happy organisation.
I bet there's many more boxing atrocities that I don't know about that these lot are responsible for.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
Wax On wrote:Ring belt worth more than each of them on there own IMO.
It's status seems to be growing monthly at the mo.
As I said here: http://forum.boxrec.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=92747
The unbiased, real boxing fans know who the champions are and who the good fighters are.Gray-Fox wrote:The Ring title means nothing now Oscar owns it.
Him buying that is like the Government "owning" the BBC.
It's just a pity that they're in the minority.
Re: Is the WBO slipping in status?
Worse than that Banjo, it was a WBO mandatory!banjo wrote: The WBC and WBO sanctioned arguarbly the mismatch of the year in Pavlik-Lockett