question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Come on Adam, defend your corner
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Boxing fans who buy PPV, will be purchase regardless because DLH v Pacman is a superfight. To be honest its largely irrelevant what Warren puts on and more than likely Khan has eaten up 30% of the pot if not 50%.
Well, I say that, however, I wont be purchasing the bill - so I'll contradict myself and save anyone else the trouble.
Well, I say that, however, I wont be purchasing the bill - so I'll contradict myself and save anyone else the trouble.
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
And what have presenters Adam Smith or Ed Robinson go to do with any of these questions on SKY's fight policy?
Noble, sentiments billy bessey, but you're an idiot
Noble, sentiments billy bessey, but you're an idiot
-
EddieShredder
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
I remember when you used to be amusingKhaosai-Galaxy wrote:
Noble, sentiments billy bessey, but you're an idiot
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
billy bessey wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:And what have presenters Adam Smith or Ed Robinson go to do with any of these questions on SKY's fight policy?
Noble, sentiments billy bessey, but you're an idiot
yep your totally right there i wasnt really thinking but surely adam ed or someone could put this to someone that could enlighten us with the answers
On a friday afternoon?
Also, would you put questions to your boss that you found typed all in caps on an internet forum?
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote: Also, would you put questions to your boss that you found typed all in caps on an internet forum?
-
EddieShredder
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
No doubt. KG's a funny guy... but recently he's just been bitter, taking swipes at everyone without actually adding anything of worth to the forum. Shame, used to be a good poster.Deserter wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote: Also, would you put questions to your boss that you found typed all in caps on an internet forum?To be fair Eddie, he still can be when he puts his mind to it!
Calling people an idiot straight off like that, is plain out of order
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Oh, don't get me wrong, I actually agree with you - if you do a search of recent posts you'll see I said he'd lost his humour and become a bit of a boring troll, but on occasion he can roll the years back...EddieShredder wrote:No doubt. KG's a funny guy... but recently he's just been bitter, taking swipes at everyone without actually adding anything of worth to the forum. Shame, used to be a good poster.Deserter wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote: Also, would you put questions to your boss that you found typed all in caps on an internet forum?To be fair Eddie, he still can be when he puts his mind to it!
Calling people an idiot straight off like that, is plain out of order
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
All caps and no punctuation make me not read 
-
housesecond
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 474
- Joined: 16 Nov 2008, 10:00
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Good points, well made. Not sure you'l get a response though.
The boxing game's been on its knees for years, coinciding with punters being fed very poor quality match-ups. Just when it'd started recovering a bit, something takes it right back down again.
The boxing game's been on its knees for years, coinciding with punters being fed very poor quality match-ups. Just when it'd started recovering a bit, something takes it right back down again.
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Boxing was going through a bit of a revival a year or so ago but with one sided fights and more pull outs than a Catholic gang bang, its back where it was.housesecond wrote:Good points, well made. Not sure you'l get a response though.
The boxing game's been on its knees for years, coinciding with punters being fed very poor quality match-ups. Just when it'd started recovering a bit, something takes it right back down again.
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Let me start off by saying that the British part of the card really had nothing to do with this being p.p.v, cook vs foster not that great a fight anyway then you have enzo vs banks a Friday night fight, enzo is a c/b class fighter anyway who got exposed big time.The main part of this p.p.v and the main reason it seems people are buying it is a horrible mismatch pac vs dlh and no one seems that bothered in fact people are stating that its the only reason they will buy this despite the fact its a 80/20 fight in dlh's favour so really golden boy promotions are just as bad.One more thing good luck Carl froch 
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
billy bessey wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:And what have presenters Adam Smith or Ed Robinson go to do with any of these questions on SKY's fight policy?
Noble, sentiments billy bessey, but you're an idiot
yep your totally right there i wasnt really thinking but surely adam ed or someone could put this to someone that could enlighten us with the answers
Billy, do not get involved with any discussion with KackBoy GalaxyButthole
He IS and idiot an the forums Resident Rent Boy hence the name GalaxyButthole - I kid you not!
Sky is shit and I will be canceling asap - they are not getting my £50.00 a month anymore.....IN YOUR FACE...SKY!
Last edited by DG. on 06 Dec 2008, 09:47, edited 2 times in total.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Torres1 wrote:Let me start off by saying that the British part of the card really had nothing to do with this being p.p.v, cook vs foster not that great a fight anyway then you have enzo vs banks a Friday night fight, enzo is a c/b class fighter anyway who got exposed big time.The main part of this p.p.v and the main reason it seems people are buying it is a horrible mismatch pac vs dlh and no one seems that bothered in fact people are stating that its the only reason they will buy this despite the fact its a 80/20 fight in dlh's favour so really golden boy promotions are just as bad.One more thing good luck Carl froch
The reason this is PPV is KHAN!!!
DLH has not had many PPV fights in the UK.
I am sure the Mosley fights etc were free.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
chesh wrote:Correct, DG.
Is what I am here for!
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
i have to respectfully disagree no way is this ppv for kahn even with all the drop outs from the British side of the bill sky sports is not pushing the khan fight much,the fact that dlh v pac is seen as an eliminator for hatton's next opponent is the main angle i can see for this being ppv plus pacman is much more high profile opponent than Mosley or any number of dlh's recent opponents excluding mayweather.I know sky sports are clueless but not to the extent that Khan is still ppv material or ever was what numbers did the Prescott fight do????????DG. wrote:Torres1 wrote:Let me start off by saying that the British part of the card really had nothing to do with this being p.p.v, cook vs foster not that great a fight anyway then you have enzo vs banks a Friday night fight, enzo is a c/b class fighter anyway who got exposed big time.The main part of this p.p.v and the main reason it seems people are buying it is a horrible mismatch pac vs dlh and no one seems that bothered in fact people are stating that its the only reason they will buy this despite the fact its a 80/20 fight in dlh's favour so really golden boy promotions are just as bad.One more thing good luck Carl froch![]()
The reason this is PPV is KHAN!!!
DLH has not had many PPV fights in the UK.
I am sure the Mosley fights etc were free.
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
Khan's fights ate mostly PPV as per his contract with Fwanky.
The original bill was BETTER than the Prescott bull and THAT WAS PPV!
This is PPV because of KHAN!
This has nothing to do with Pacman - Hatton or De La Hoya!
If it were to do with Hatton then PACMAN vs DE LA HOYA would be FREE so MORE people could see THEM then buy the PPV for Hatton!
I am right, you are wrong.

The original bill was BETTER than the Prescott bull and THAT WAS PPV!
This is PPV because of KHAN!
This has nothing to do with Pacman - Hatton or De La Hoya!
If it were to do with Hatton then PACMAN vs DE LA HOYA would be FREE so MORE people could see THEM then buy the PPV for Hatton!
I am right, you are wrong.
Re: question for adam smith,ed robinson or anyone from SKY T.V?
just because khan has a contract for ppv with warren do you seriously think sky have one that says you only get to show khan on ppvDG. wrote:Khan's fights ate mostly PPV as per his contract with Fwanky.
The original bill was BETTER than the Prescott bull and THAT WAS PPV!
This is PPV because of KHAN!
This has nothing to do with Pacman - Hatton or De La Hoya!
If it were to do with Hatton then PACMAN vs DE LA HOYA would be FREE so MORE people could see THEM then buy the PPV for Hatton!
I am right, you are wrong.
![]()