http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7917846.stm
Spot the error! Also Frank's quote is incorrect, he said it was the best heavyweight FIGHT he had seen in 10-15 years.
Bad BBC!
Re: Bad BBC!
"Prieviously unbeaten Skelton?"whicker wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7917846.stm
Spot the error! Also Frank's quote is incorrect, he said it was the best heavyweight FIGHT he had seen in 10-15 years.
-
doctorboxing
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 951
- Joined: 14 Aug 2008, 11:23
Re: Bad BBC!
The previously unbeaten Skelton now has to surrender his European title and 37-year-old Rogan is being lined up for a crack at the belt.
Unbeaten?????
Unbeaten?????
Re: Bad BBC!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7917216.stm
Another one, see what they get wrong here.
Another one, see what they get wrong here.
Re: Bad BBC!
previously unbeaten is an overused phrase. many writers use it wrongly, because anyone was unbeaten once unless they lost their pro debut.
Re: Bad BBC!
Yeah, but I'd think it was more simply a case of the writer not knowing the facts. He might have meant previously unbeaten by stoppage?Autobarn wrote:previously unbeaten is an overused phrase. many writers use it wrongly, because anyone was unbeaten once unless they lost their pro debut.