I think a 6 monthly meet would be a cracking idea. It's finding the right fight the right venue and everyone being able to get there, pay for tickets etc.
I might head up to Sheffield for the Woods fight, anyone planning on going there?
bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
Bennie, the lack of avatars etc is a bonus. I'm hear to read boxing opinion and fact, not look at pictures of porn stars.....(which most of them seem to be)
I wouldn't say Boxrec is particularly "glossy" to the eye, but then does it have to be? All seems fine to me. The structure is right and thats the most important thing I reckon.
Good post. I used to like posting boxing pics in my avatar, which is the only reason I miss having one. But, yes, most avatars are just tacky.
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think a 6 monthly meet would be a cracking idea. It's finding the right fight the right venue and everyone being able to get there, pay for tickets etc.
I might head up to Sheffield for the Woods fight, anyone planning on going there?
I'll be there, driving up from London and I might stay the night.
If I go, I might just take you up on that, depend on whether or not my mate is gonna be around. It's a fornicate of a long way for a bloody round trip.
Remind me nearer the time, I've got a memory like a sieve
bennie wrote:On this topic, is there anything that members feel is lacking on the forum! I know the lack of avatars makes the place a bit dull-looking, but at the end of the day we're all here to talk boxing so I can live with that (begrudingly so).
But has anybody got any ideas on making the place even better!
What about an annual or 6 monthly meet up (at one of the shows or a drink or something like that).
Putting faces to names might give posting a bit more of an edge?
What do you guys think?
Good idea, I'd be up for that. Have to keep an eye on bennie though, he hits the whiskey hard!
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I like the fact this forum isn't crammed full of fornicating irritating smiley's all the time, it just makes things harder to read for me.
It must be said...this forum pisses all over ESB..if i want any fight news i always come on here to check what you guys have to say about things...and this might come across as a bit arse-licky but most of you guys know your shit.
Chambers wrote:Hi Steve, hows life? I see the Wolves are still shit
Big Dave
Hi Big Dave, yup Wolves are still crap but we are still looking down at you lot God i hope Albion stay down You should stop by here more often, but at least you got through a post without mentioning Audley 8)
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think without a doubt this is the best Forum I've ever been a part of, the depth of knowledge on here is staggering, sometimes it embarrasses me that I know so little, especially where British boxing is concerned.
Ain't that the truth....
I used to think I knew a lot about boxing
Yeah.... I thought Moseley never faught at Lightweight.
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I think without a doubt this is the best Forum I've ever been a part of, the depth of knowledge on here is staggering, sometimes it embarrasses me that I know so little, especially where British boxing is concerned.
Ain't that the truth....
I used to think I knew a lot about boxing
Yeah.... I thought Moseley never faught at Lightweight.
stujones wrote:
My remark was concerning a recent thread about the greatest ten fighters in the classic weight divisions. It was just a lapse.
Stu, I have only just noticed this extremely serious error on your part, which I'm afraid has all the hallmarks of serious drug use.
I have had to make a note of it in my Moderator's Report ,which I submit weekly to Bennie.
He is currently montoring the situation closely. Any other errors of this magnitude and a ban of two weeks may be enforced, or maybe a fine at the very least