As we all know, Sven Ottke is the WBA SUPER CHAMPION at 168 and Anthony Mundine is the WBA regualr champion at 168. Under Mundine's victory over Antwun Echols, I think the bit of information explaining the situation with the WBA and the Super Champion should be more consistent and along the lines as the William Joppy-Howard Eastman one.
It should say this:
The WBA Super Middleweight title was vacated when former champ Sven Ottke was declared a "Super" champion.
Instead of saying:
"The WBA Super Middleweight title was vacated when Sven Ottke was upgraded to "Super" Champion status.
I think the inclusion of "Former Champ" is necessary as Ottke was the former WBA champ - but was "Stripped" or was forced to "Vacate" his title (which ever way you want to look at the WBA's new rule) - because of unifying the two belts (WBA & IBF). I also think "was declared a "Super" champion" sounds better and is more accurate then "was upgraded to super champion status"...