JC-Nard. April 19th Las Vegas in a non-title bout

Whon wins?

JC
18
86%
Nard
3
14%
 
Total votes: 21

MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Can't see Hopkins having any chance in this fight, Joe will batter that ugly mug for 12 long rounds. In fact Bernie might end up better looking than when he went in.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Post by J »

yes but Nard wasnt supposed to have a chance against Tito or Tarver coming off two losses to taylor and we know what happened there.
boxbet
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 363
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 11:01

Post by boxbet »

I like the part where the alphabet belts are made redundent. top fighters dont need them.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

STP wrote:Hopkins will take him out.
:o How can Hopkins take out a Supernatural missing link In human evolution?
Is it not for the RING title?
Yeah but the Rings like the WBU, no mandatries and too leaniat on champs and are HBO's slave.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

MightyWarrior wrote:Can't see Hopkins having any chance in this fight, Joe will batter that ugly mug for 12 long rounds. In fact Bernie might end up better looking than when he went in.
when has bernard ever been battered for 12 rounds? he's still got his great defence. calzaghe will be throwing and missing, if he wins he wins purely on volume, and that volume has to negate bernard's counters.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Post by Deserter »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote:Can't see Hopkins having any chance in this fight, Joe will batter that ugly mug for 12 long rounds. In fact Bernie might end up better looking than when he went in.
when has bernard ever been battered for 12 rounds? he's still got his great defence. calzaghe will be throwing and missing, if he wins he wins purely on volume, and that volume has to negate bernard's counters.
I think that's right on the money. This is in no way going to be the walk in the park some people think it's going to be.
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Post by WildWaylon »

Calzaghe 1,000,000 -1 to KO Hopkins. Hopkins 10-1 to KO Calzaghe. Points win by Joe 7 rounds to 5 in a horrible looking fight. Joe may have to get up to win, its going to be his toughest yet.
Southpaw Stylist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1484
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50

Post by Southpaw Stylist »

I'm going for Hopkins on points.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote:Can't see Hopkins having any chance in this fight, Joe will batter that ugly mug for 12 long rounds. In fact Bernie might end up better looking than when he went in.
when has bernard ever been battered for 12 rounds? he's still got his great defence. calzaghe will be throwing and missing, if he wins he wins purely on volume, and that volume has to negate bernard's counters.
Well never TBH, BHop has always been far too cautious to take risks in a fight he looks like losing. I'd like to see Joe put on a performance like that, but I guess BH will fiddle his way to a points defeat, and not take too many punches.
He's not winning though - he can't hurt Calzaghe and he's not outworking him either.
Post Reply