Good opponent for Macklin...

Post Reply
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Good opponent for Macklin...

Post by bennie »

Matt Macklin meets Sheffield's useful Dean Walker on Saturday in Cardiff. The Brummie, having his first fight since another Sheffield man, Andrew Facey, outsmarted him for the English light-middleweight title in November, won't have it easy with Walker, who has won his last nine fights on the spin.
This is a good match.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Post by THEBUTCH »

Bennie,

Yes it's a fair choice of opponent considering Macklin is coming off a loss.

That said, Walker's record doesn't indicate much power and his wins are over novices and losing journeyman. Good matchmaking from Macklin's point of view of getting a win.

Is Walker particularly skilful?
bennie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15244
Joined: 15 Nov 2002, 09:53

Post by bennie »

THEBUTCH wrote:Bennie,

Yes it's a fair choice of opponent considering Macklin is coming off a loss.

That said, Walker's record doesn't indicate much power and his wins are over novices and losing journeyman. Good matchmaking from Macklin's point of view of getting a win.

Is Walker particularly skilful?
To be honest, I don't know Butch. I'm sure someone on the forum can answer your question.
Haighy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 50
Joined: 09 Mar 2003, 14:22

Post by Haighy »

i went to the recent koncrete promotions bill at the barnsley metrodome recently and walker was on the bill,he's not really skillful he's just a ruff and ready fighter who's got resnoble skills.I do feel he has been very well matched and will be stopped in around 3 rounds on saturday.
TerribleTerry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5272
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30

Post by TerribleTerry »

Just leaving for Cardiff now - good opponent for Macklin's first fight back. Lets see if Macklin can take Walker out - look out for a new style body attack - or settles back in and looks to do the job on points.
Post Reply