Out with the old - in with the new!!!
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Out with the old - in with the new!!!
Mr W arren's stable of boxers:
Who are his elite boxers:
Who are his Chief Support boxers:
Who are the ones to watch:
I will also ask is he as strong as ever:
Who could he sign:
Who are his elite boxers:
Who are his Chief Support boxers:
Who are the ones to watch:
I will also ask is he as strong as ever:
Who could he sign:
Re: Out with the old - in with the new!!!
Well, of course there are 2 big world title fights coming up which will be critical... should Lockett and/or Arthur pull off the huge upset.Spud wrote:Mr W arren's stable of boxers:
Who are his elite boxers:
Who are his Chief Support boxers:
Who are the ones to watch:
I will also ask is he as strong as ever:
Who could he sign:
Main Eventers
Khan, Calzaghe (for the moment), Mitchell, Arthur,
Chief Support Boxers
Gavin Rees, Enzo Mac, Gary Lockett, Bradley Pryce, Ryan Rhodes, Heavyweights, host of others (Jennings, Minter, Small etc)
Ones to look out for.
Tony Doherty, Anthony Small, Anderson, Kell Brook.
Who should he sign?
Mmm... Interesting.. Well of course, he could try and get a piece of Haye. There are not too many prospects out there - on a world wide scale... let alone domestically. Paul Appleby could provide some excitement. I'd love to see Guzman fight here more often (or just fight more often). Any chance Valero could get a licence here?
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Frank's done a great job recently (and as someone that criticised him relentlessly, that's a real volte-face), he's always paid his fighters well and the normal tendency for fighters who leave him, is to believe like Hamed and Hatton is that they no longer need him - probably right in Ricky's case.
Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
By and large, this is spot on.Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.Gray-Fox wrote:By and large, this is spot on.Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3340
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Mr Beagleboys,twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.
With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;
Mr Twinkle Toes,
Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.
Payne,
You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
-
twenty six
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3574
- Joined: 17 Jun 2006, 13:43
Maybe I've misread your thread Spud.
If I have then sorry.
I read your intention being to demonstrate his stable was in decline with certain high profile losses and elite fighters at the end of the road.
My point was simply that other UK Promotors are in the same situation but that Warren's position is stronger than the others.
If Clinton does retire then who headlines for Dennis ?
If Froch loses who headlines for Hennessy ?
On the subject of Clinton, I am waiting to hear the outcome of these blood tests.
If they prove Clinton had a strain of meningitis in him when he fought it explains his apparent lethargy.
Heard anything ?
If I have then sorry.
I read your intention being to demonstrate his stable was in decline with certain high profile losses and elite fighters at the end of the road.
My point was simply that other UK Promotors are in the same situation but that Warren's position is stronger than the others.
If Clinton does retire then who headlines for Dennis ?
If Froch loses who headlines for Hennessy ?
On the subject of Clinton, I am waiting to hear the outcome of these blood tests.
If they prove Clinton had a strain of meningitis in him when he fought it explains his apparent lethargy.
Heard anything ?
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Have you just thrown half-time tea cups around the dressing room?Spud wrote:Mr Beagleboys,twenty six wrote:Spud,
I hate to be controversial, but don't you think this question is better posed at Hennessy and Hobson ?
If we're talking about comparing strength of depth then these guys are in the kids paddling pool, not even the shallow end in comparison.
Warren is No 1 UK by a mile, and when the talent starts filtering through, as it inevitably will, Warren will select and acquire the cream of the crop.
Unless Calzaghe signs them all first !!!!
My thread is in no way a dig at Mr W arren - just some very clear questions.
With regards to Fight Academy and Hennessy Sports - why not start a thread yourself mate ;
Mr Twinkle Toes,
Just read your comment mate - I regard Dennis and everyone at fight Academy as pals and always will - there are certainly no problems there.
Payne,
You are a ****. It seems you are intent and will not stop along with your merry band of other stupid ****s to keep digging and digging yet its me ruining this forum??
Get over yourself Spud.
I don't think there's much issue about the money - Warren is pretty good for the fighters, except in the sense that he tries ever so hard to keep them out of competitive match ups wherever possible!Old bones Ian wrote:Of course anyone signing a contract should get it looked over by a lawyer, but also you don't get many boxers slagging off Warren for ripping them off. He does seem to pay the main events what there worth.Gray-Fox wrote:By and large, this is spot on.Loynesy wrote:Therefore, he will continue to be our dominant promoter - he doesn't (by his own admission) know much about the technical aspects of boxing, but if I was advising any of the Beijing Olympic candidates, I'd tell them to get a good lawyer to read the contract, but ultimately sign with him.
I think this is a good point, whilst there will always be the big money to be made turning pro, I can see a fair few of this years Olympians waiting for 2012 and the chance to win gold in LondonChambers2 wrote:Anyone know if any of the top class British amateurs will turn pro after Beijing or will they hang on for the glory of 2012?