Anyone watched the HBO version of Hopkins/Calzaghe?
Anyone watched the HBO version of Hopkins/Calzaghe?
I've got a theory the HBO broadcast was pro-Joe and has led to the majority of American fans also believing Joe won clearly. While the Sultana broadcast was less pro-Joe, and has led to a lot more (the majority?) UK fans seeing either a much, much closer fight or as I did a Hopkins win.
I BET you all those flurries, where to my eyes Joe missed a lot, were shouted up and scored as clean punches by the HBO commentary and also on Ledermans card.
I'm intrigued to watch it anyway just to see if the impression I get coming away from the fight is still the same as it was watching it on Setanta. Has anyone seen it, is there much anti-Hopkins / pro-Joe from Kellerman & co ?
I BET you all those flurries, where to my eyes Joe missed a lot, were shouted up and scored as clean punches by the HBO commentary and also on Ledermans card.
I'm intrigued to watch it anyway just to see if the impression I get coming away from the fight is still the same as it was watching it on Setanta. Has anyone seen it, is there much anti-Hopkins / pro-Joe from Kellerman & co ?
-
DG.
- Heavyweight

Re: Anyone watched the HBO version of Hopkins/Calzaghe?
I have seen the Setanta broadcast 5 times and JC always wins - by 2 - 3 rounds.Mensa07 wrote:I've got a theory the HBO broadcast was pro-Joe and has led to the majority of American fans also believing Joe won clearly. While the Sultana broadcast was less pro-Joe, and has led to a lot more (the majority?) UK fans seeing either a much, much closer fight or as I did a Hopkins win.
I BET you all those flurries, where to my eyes Joe missed a lot, were shouted up and scored as clean punches by the HBO commentary and also on Ledermans card.
I'm intrigued to watch it anyway just to see if the impression I get coming away from the fight is still the same as it was watching it on Setanta. Has anyone seen it, is there much anti-Hopkins / pro-Joe from Kellerman & co ?
It's nothing new for HBO to be like that. Check out Taylor v Spinks (the most unprofessional commentary I've ever witnessed) and Pavlik v Taylor II (why they allowed Steward to commentate is beyond me).
It's a shame, as I prefer getting the HBO versions of fights than the Setanta versions. But if they are pro Joe on it, like people have said, I won't bother.
It's a shame, as I prefer getting the HBO versions of fights than the Setanta versions. But if they are pro Joe on it, like people have said, I won't bother.
Lederman sounds like Dom Jolly when he answers his big phone.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Why do you think they keep Kellerman and Lederman. They suck at everything else other than shouting.Asterix wrote:I don't get why the American commentators are so monotone. Why don't they hire people who get excited about boxing?
"Goooooooooooooooolaaaaaazioooooo!"
"Okay Jim, I'm in Belgium"Asterix wrote:Lederman sounds like Dom Jolly when he answers his big phone.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Why do you think they keep Kellerman and Lederman. They suck at everything else other than shouting.Asterix wrote:I don't get why the American commentators are so monotone. Why don't they hire people who get excited about boxing?
"Goooooooooooooooolaaaaaazioooooo!"
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
I didn't know how to spell it so I Googled, hoping for a correction. I wasn't given one. No need to call me a clown. :(Riddick Blowe wrote:Lol, it's GOLAZZO you clown. Why would an Italian shout GO LAZIO??Asterix wrote:I don't get why the American commentators are so monotone. Why don't they hire people who get excited about boxing?
"Goooooooooooooooolaaaaaazioooooo!"
"Gooooooooooojuuuuuuveeeeee!"