The Hatton knockdown
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

The Hatton knockdown
I was at the fight and it looked like a legit kd to me - what was it like on TV?
-
jammidodger
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 217
- Joined: 19 Nov 2007, 17:06
Re: The Hatton knockdown
deffo a slip mate... 
-
HughJohnson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 134
- Joined: 22 Jun 2007, 08:02
Re: The Hatton knockdown
Lazcano threw a punch...so it could of been called a KD, obviously Hatton was not hurt tho.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown
I knew he wasnt hurt - but from where I was it was the force of the punch combine with Hattons weight being on his heels that led to the kd - therefore technically a legit kd.HughJohnson wrote:Lazcano threw a punch...so it could of been called a KD, obviously Hatton was not hurt tho.
Re: The Hatton knockdown
I'm not sure it was possible to call it a knockdown, because the reason Hatton went over was definately losing his footing rather than the punch.
I was streaming it in, so it was difficult to see whether the punch even landed, despite the high quality stream.
However, even if it did land, it was not the punch which caused Hatton to hit the deck.
That being said, I suspect in the olden days they would have called it. For instance, does anyone remember seeing Ken Buchanan's early knockdown against Duran in the Garden?
I was streaming it in, so it was difficult to see whether the punch even landed, despite the high quality stream.
However, even if it did land, it was not the punch which caused Hatton to hit the deck.
That being said, I suspect in the olden days they would have called it. For instance, does anyone remember seeing Ken Buchanan's early knockdown against Duran in the Garden?
-
Khaosai-Galaxy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2739
- Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15
Re: The Hatton knockdown
What if it was?
What if it wasn't?
Did it make any difference what-so-ever to the result?
What if it wasn't?
Did it make any difference what-so-ever to the result?
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown
who said it made any difference to the result?Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:What if it was?
What if it wasn't?
Did it make any difference what-so-ever to the result?
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown
so if Lazcano hadnt have thrown a punch Hatton would have fallen over??Carbo wrote:I'm not sure it was possible to call it a knockdown, because the reason Hatton went over was definately losing his footing rather than the punch.
I was streaming it in, so it was difficult to see whether the punch even landed, despite the high quality stream.
However, even if it did land, it was not the punch which caused Hatton to hit the deck.
That being said, I suspect in the olden days they would have called it. For instance, does anyone remember seeing Ken Buchanan's early knockdown against Duran in the Garden?
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: The Hatton knockdown
most definitely a slip.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown
1.45 in - doesnt look like a slip from here - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6YLWttCEeoMhitman_hatton1 wrote:most definitely a slip.
-
sharpei_louis
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 644
- Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30
Re: The Hatton knockdown
1.45 in, looks to me like the Lazcano left hook missed completely, only the angle of the ref stepping across made it look like it played any part in the slip.