The Hatton knockdown

Locked
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

The Hatton knockdown

Post by slapbangwhallop »

I was at the fight and it looked like a legit kd to me - what was it like on TV?
jammidodger
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 217
Joined: 19 Nov 2007, 17:06

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by jammidodger »

deffo a slip mate... :TU:
HughJohnson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 134
Joined: 22 Jun 2007, 08:02

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by HughJohnson »

Lazcano threw a punch...so it could of been called a KD, obviously Hatton was not hurt tho.
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by slapbangwhallop »

HughJohnson wrote:Lazcano threw a punch...so it could of been called a KD, obviously Hatton was not hurt tho.
I knew he wasnt hurt - but from where I was it was the force of the punch combine with Hattons weight being on his heels that led to the kd - therefore technically a legit kd.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by Carbo »

I'm not sure it was possible to call it a knockdown, because the reason Hatton went over was definately losing his footing rather than the punch.

I was streaming it in, so it was difficult to see whether the punch even landed, despite the high quality stream.

However, even if it did land, it was not the punch which caused Hatton to hit the deck.

That being said, I suspect in the olden days they would have called it. For instance, does anyone remember seeing Ken Buchanan's early knockdown against Duran in the Garden?
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

What if it was?

What if it wasn't?



Did it make any difference what-so-ever to the result?
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:What if it was?

What if it wasn't?

Did it make any difference what-so-ever to the result?
who said it made any difference to the result? :roll:
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by slapbangwhallop »

Carbo wrote:I'm not sure it was possible to call it a knockdown, because the reason Hatton went over was definately losing his footing rather than the punch.

I was streaming it in, so it was difficult to see whether the punch even landed, despite the high quality stream.

However, even if it did land, it was not the punch which caused Hatton to hit the deck.

That being said, I suspect in the olden days they would have called it. For instance, does anyone remember seeing Ken Buchanan's early knockdown against Duran in the Garden?
so if Lazcano hadnt have thrown a punch Hatton would have fallen over??
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

most definitely a slip.
slapbangwhallop
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by slapbangwhallop »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:most definitely a slip.
1.45 in - doesnt look like a slip from here - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6YLWttCEeoM
sharpei_louis
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 644
Joined: 22 Nov 2007, 08:30

Re: The Hatton knockdown

Post by sharpei_louis »

1.45 in, looks to me like the Lazcano left hook missed completely, only the angle of the ref stepping across made it look like it played any part in the slip.
Locked