Is a massive name really Derry Matthews or someone?
Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
-
scrap iron
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 407
- Joined: 02 Jan 2007, 17:38
Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
When Steve Bunce was talking about Alex Arthur he mention two massive names were being discussed for Arthur's next fight in September, but he would expect Arthur to get past either one of them and set up a fight with possibly Kevin Mitchell in December. Now massive names to me would be Marquez, Guzman, Valero etc. If that's the case then how come Bunce is so confident Arthur would come through unscathed against them?
Is a massive name really Derry Matthews or someone?
Is a massive name really Derry Matthews or someone?
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
130 is a bit devoid of talent now so a massive name for the division ain't like it was 12 months ago.
I hope it's not Baloyi or I'll go apeshit.
I hope it's not Baloyi or I'll go apeshit.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
We all know that BIG Steve is prone to the SLIGHT exaggeration, so I suppose it depends on what Steves definition of a massive name is? my definition is the same as yours SI (Marquez, Guzman, Valero etc.), but Steve may be referring to the amount of cyllables ....... is 'Israel Hector Enrique Perez' next on the cards for AAA :)
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
I'd say the massive names are either Foster or Choiscrap iron wrote:When Steve Bunce was talking about Alex Arthur he mention two massive names were being discussed for Arthur's next fight in September, but he would expect Arthur to get past either one of them and set up a fight with possibly Kevin Mitchell in December. Now massive names to me would be Marquez, Guzman, Valero etc. If that's the case then how come Bunce is so confident Arthur would come through unscathed against them?
Is a massive name really Derry Matthews or someone?
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Yeah, something didn't feel right when he said that. I just think he was trying to portray himself as the "man in the know" really. I mean I wouldn't be surprised to see Arthur fight Ramos or McFields before fighting Mitchell and then moving up. I would personally see if Jaurez or Marquez are free because Arthur does need a big and nice payday. Although, I think Buncey was going over the top when he said that there's two massive names in the hat and I cringed when he said "if I told you I would be taken off the TV" when I really think he does't know. Or perhaps his definition of massive is average to us.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
He's usually doesn't mind announcing fights/negotations before they are announced - e.g. Hatton vs DLH again.
So why not mention names in a phrase like "wouldn't it be great if Alex Arthur fought......
I suspect Medina.
So why not mention names in a phrase like "wouldn't it be great if Alex Arthur fought......
I suspect Medina.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
I seriously suggest he was talking clear smack on Sunday. Probably trying to make himself look knowledgable, but it doesn't.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Or a comebacking Brodie? I believe he's been back in the gym for a while.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Probably meant a massive name for a fight that is massive in an all British sense.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
I can't see Frank putting Mitchell in with Arthur just yet. He will do that next year after Mitchell gets some more experience and Arthur's probably had the ordeal of losing so much weight for his next fight because I believe Arthur will soon be dead at 130lbs, if he isn't already. It won't be Mitchell, I swear to God.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Too dangerous.Terry D wrote:McGuigan looks quite fit, could be ready in a few months time
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Yeah it doesn't add up on the risk/reward ratio!chesh wrote:Too dangerous.Terry D wrote:McGuigan looks quite fit, could be ready in a few months time
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Did you notice when he was talking about people getting stick in forums, and mentioned how he always gets some when he reads them.
Well hello Steve :)
It did seen a little fishy as he usually likes to anounce these things rather than keep info up his sleave.
Well hello Steve :)
It did seen a little fishy as he usually likes to anounce these things rather than keep info up his sleave.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
stujones wrote:He's usually doesn't mind announcing fights/negotations before they are announced - e.g. Hatton vs DLH again.
So why not mention names in a phrase like "wouldn't it be great if Alex Arthur fought......
I suspect Medina.
I agree
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Why would you go apeshit? It would be a decent fight.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:130 is a bit devoid of talent now so a massive name for the division ain't like it was 12 months ago.
I hope it's not Baloyi or I'll go apeshit.
-
WildWaylon
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3223
- Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Wouldnt you fight Mitchell first before Marquez, Guzman or Valero? Mitchell is the only name I think AAA could win against and even then it would be a tough match. Buncey must be talking crap using the words "massive names".scrap iron wrote:When Steve Bunce was talking about Alex Arthur he mention two massive names were being discussed for Arthur's next fight in September, but he would expect Arthur to get past either one of them and set up a fight with possibly Kevin Mitchell in December. Now massive names to me would be Marquez, Guzman, Valero etc. If that's the case then how come Bunce is so confident Arthur would come through unscathed against them?
Is a massive name really Derry Matthews or someone?
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
LOL @ Brodie. Why can't these fighters stay retired?
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
Drawing with a 99 year-old Medina and an okay performance against St Clair and Fana didn't exactly fill me with hope.Horse wrote:Why would you go apeshit? It would be a decent fight.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:130 is a bit devoid of talent now so a massive name for the division ain't like it was 12 months ago.
I hope it's not Baloyi or I'll go apeshit.
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
The queerest thing about what Bunce said was that Arthur fighting this massive 'name' would then set him up for a fight with Kevin Mitchell
Surely we can all see the irony in that?
Surely we can all see the irony in that?
Re: Something Steve Bunce said that didn't seem to make sense...
In Brodies case it's because of an expensive divorce settlement, so I read (I think)Gray-Fox wrote:LOL @ Brodie. Why can't these fighters stay retired?