
.
ANSWER :




BigBadJane belongs to the women's club who demand that no photos of their Ali be allowedBig Bad John wrote:BoxBuzz, why don't you simply put Granberry on your "foes" list? Then you won't have to read his posts. I mean, if people keep putting him on their "foes" list, he'll have no reason to post here, since no one will read anything he writes.

The first pic was taken after Ali lost to Norton, not Frazier.granberry wrote:WHY ARE THESE MEN CRYING ?
.
ANSWER :
Big Bad John wrote:BoxBuzz, why don't you simply put Granberry on your "foes" list? Then you won't have to read his posts. I mean, if people keep putting him on their "foes" list, he'll have no reason to post here, since no one will read anything he writes.
The photographs without context make no sense at all...You're in the U K so maybe it doesn't make sense but his photograph is as revealing as Ben Wallace blocking Shaquille O'Neal, Willie Mays striking out, Michael Jordan shooting an air ball, or Tiger Woods shanking a golf ball...Ezzard wrote:Granberry
Why not let it all out? Everything you want to say about Ali: put it in this thread. Then we can all read your opinions and make up our minds. Some will agree with you other disagree. Some will accept some of your points and reject others.
Expunge yourself of this bile and then we can all get on with talking about other aspects of boxing, soemthing you often do very well...
why insult one of the greatest heavyweights of all timeSteveO wrote:Granberry, how about posting a picture of Joe Frazier's face after the 'Thrilla In Manila'
TheOneIsHere2008 wrote: I have a better solution...I just disabled the image feature.

Gene Tunney: He is a mediocre fighter at best.TheOneIsHere2008 wrote:
Every unbiased fan, historian, analyst, boxer, and former boxer recognizes Ali as the consummate winner in the ring...
Would your imaginery boxing friends be impressed if they saw the threads where you claimed that a southpaw throwing a left hook would punch himself in the face?Knucklez wrote:Granberry, you are, without a shadow of doubt, the least interesting man I have ever met in my life.
granberry wrote:Gene Tunney: He is a mediocre fighter at best.TheOneIsHere2008 wrote:
Every unbiased fan, historian, analyst, boxer, and former boxer recognizes Ali as the consummate winner in the ring...
Joe Louis: He doesn't have what we call a hard punch. He doesn't have the punch to make him a fighter.
George Chuvalo: It was a phony. [commenting to the Liston-Ali II fake]
Nat Fleischer: Clay an all-time top 10? Definitely No. [RING magazine Sept 1971]
Jimmy Cannon: It wouldn't have broken an egg.[referring to the 'punch' in the Liston-Ali II fake]
That's just for starters.
No? o.k how about the one of George Foreman being counted out in the 'Rumble In The Jungle'.SteveO wrote:Granberry, how about posting a picture of Joe Frazier's face after the 'Thrilla In Manila'
granberry wrote:I FEEL THE ALI FAN'S PAIN.
.
Liking Ali doesn't mean you have to hate Joe...But, yes, Frazier took a whale of a beating in the first and third fights and it was his willingness to take those beatings that let him win the first bout and would have left him blind in the third if not for the intervention of Eddie Futch...bennie wrote:
I love Joe. It just adds a bit of balance.TheOneIsHere2008 wrote:Liking Ali doesn't mean you have to hate Joe...But, yes, Frazier took a whale of a beating in the first and third fights and it was his willingness to take those beatings that let him win the first bout and would have left him blind in the second if not for the intervention of Eddie Futch...bennie wrote:
Ali was knocked down a whopping four times in a twenty year career and got up every time...He was only stopped once, as a thirty old year man, bereft of the skills that defined him, two years away from the game, and drawn from thyroid drugs...
Muhammad Ali is a transcendent sports figure and cultural icon evenafter almost thirty years away from htting somebody for money...