Dave Parris or wtahever his name is.

DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Dave Parris or wtahever his name is.

Post by DG. »

England's answer to Joe Cortez.

What a joke!

3 points taken off!

The low blow was NOT low.

The shove did not warrant a point!

A Point off because Williams had his elbow twisted???

Pathetic.

DP hates DW


:D
Last edited by DG. on 19 Jul 2008, 16:35, edited 2 times in total.
johnty1888
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 417
Joined: 10 Oct 2003, 14:27

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by johnty1888 »

jeez, he must have had a bet on McDermott
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by Asterix »

I disagree.
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by DG. »

:lol:


Dave Parrish must be sick as a dog!



:lol:


:TU:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

i've only just come in.

only saw the last 2 rds.

disagreed with those pt deductions though.

especially the one in the 12th.

williams has got it anyway. :lol:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by DG. »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.

only saw the last 2 rds.

disagreed with those pt deductions though.

especially the one in the 12th.

williams has got it anyway. :lol:

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!

3 points and ALL for nothing!

Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!



:lol:
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by exittored »

Parrish was terrible, 3 point deductions from Danny and they were alll totally wrong and what the feck was Jim Watt watching giving J mac last 2 rounds???

Glad Danny won though, not a good performance but apart from 1st and 5th, i think he won every other round
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

DG. wrote:
hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.

only saw the last 2 rds.

disagreed with those pt deductions though.

especially the one in the 12th.

williams has got it anyway. :lol:

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!

3 points and ALL for nothing!

Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!



:lol:
yeah all 3 looked wrong.

i'm a little worse for wear leek.

but they looked wrong. :lol:

unless danny had been dirty all night or something. :roll:
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by DG. »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
DG. wrote:
hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.

only saw the last 2 rds.

disagreed with those pt deductions though.

especially the one in the 12th.

williams has got it anyway. :lol:

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!

3 points and ALL for nothing!

Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!



:lol:
yeah all 3 looked wrong.

i'm a little worse for wear leek.

but they looked wrong. :lol:

unless danny had been dirty all night or something. :roll:



Parrish should be banned!

Mcdermott did not WIN this fight.

Those 3 points were a joke.

BUT... DW won!

:lol:

Fcuk you DP!

WTF is Johnny Nelsson talking about?

Someone get Carlos De leon on the phone!


:D
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by The_Don1 »

looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho
DG.
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by DG. »

The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho

The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.

P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!


:D
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by The_Don1 »

DG. wrote:
The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho

The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.

P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!


:D

what the raaas? DW straight spat his shield out!
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by exittored »

What u talking about, the body shots were fine plus j mac shud have been one to get penalised for holding in the 12th
The_Don1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1139
Joined: 15 Feb 2008, 07:32

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by The_Don1 »

exittored wrote:What u talking about, the body shots were fine plus j mac shud have been one to get penalised for holding in the 12th
yeah - if you count the crotch area as a part of the body!
1southpaw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 28 Apr 2007, 14:23

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by 1southpaw »

i thought the ruling was 3 points and your out if so what happened ???
jonny
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 707
Joined: 29 Mar 2004, 08:42

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by jonny »

DG. wrote:
The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho

The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.

P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!


:D
Not good tonight from Parris, can half go with the first 2 deductions but the third no way, McDermott was giving it large
BigEars
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 997
Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 14:23

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by BigEars »

1southpaw wrote:i thought the ruling was 3 points and your out if so what happened ???
That's normally for the same offence, and it's not an official rule either, just how things generally go .
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by lefthook82 »

Isnt he the ref that incorrectly awarded a fight between Williams and Sprott in Sprott's favour when even Michael knew he hadn't won the fight

Maybe he doesnt like Williams
SticknMove
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5994
Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by SticknMove »

Application of rules appears to be a subjective.

If Parris had warned Williams about the low blows throughout the fight then a point has to be deducted - we were not privy to what the guy said. If a gumshield comes out once, twice or 3 times (is that thrice) then it is imcumbent on the ref to apply a rule - thus another point deducted. The other point deduction was just plain stupid IMO - a harsh warning would have been enough.

The holding from McDermott is par for the course for HWs. Being on the back foot delivering clean but ineffective shots shouldn't discount his efforts either. I am in more agreement with the commentary team than some of the shite on here tbh.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by funso banjo baby »

its the commentay that pisses me off

jim watt is looking at the reply of not a single low blow and says 'this is clumsy from williams'

those commentators were wankrs

the ref was a tit who should retire

danny survives another case of corruption and survives




go danny :box: somebody up there likes him
SticknMove
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5994
Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by SticknMove »

funso banjo baby wrote:its the commentay that pisses me off

jim watt is looking at the reply of not a single low blow and says 'this is clumsy from williams'

those commentators were wankrs

the ref was a tit who should retire

danny survives another case of corruption and survives




go danny :box: somebody up there likes him
There are many down here that like him also.

It doesn't detract from the job that the ref has to do.

Danny has strayed low below the border many times in fights and his elbow/forearm in the face when close and pushing off appears unnoteworthy too. He's no angel. But interpret fights any way they grab you.
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by chris s »

Dave Parris was a disgrace but not as bad as Sky commentators making trying it out make out it was Dagenham's answer to The Rumble in the Jungle. I thought the fight was rubbish.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by Autobarn »

I think any British heavyweight fight that doesn't end early is generally very bad.

Apart from an immediate rematch, you'd think there would be nothing for McDermott after fighting like that. He would have to go on the German tour so that Easrern European heavyweights use him as a stepping stone.
chris s
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 960
Joined: 02 Jun 2004, 08:56

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by chris s »

I don't see what grounds there are for a rematch. It was a crap fight and Danny won at least 8 rounds.
If it wasn't for Sky's dire commentary and the ref losing the plot there would be no arguments
chesh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1095
Joined: 31 May 2007, 16:05

Re: Dave Parrish

Post by chesh »

Terry D wrote:Should have lost a point for the shield, none for the low blow, and the elbow was hardly anything.

Is it me or is that the most entertainly shit fight I've seen for a while?
I know what you mean, Terry. Appalling, but somehow riveting at the same time.
Post Reply