Peter Buckley

Post Reply
Rob Magic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 31 Dec 2007, 06:42

Peter Buckley

Post by Rob Magic »

I was just sat browsing the ratings and for some reason had a thought. Peter Buckley has had 293 fights. Does he have a full-time job aswell as boxing or can he live comfortably on what he earns in the ring. I dont actually know what journeymen get paid today.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by josh fg »

don't know but was glad to read in BN the other day that he is back.
Matt Teague
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 318
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:19

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Matt Teague »

From what i remember he does abit of part time driving.

At a 'guess' id say in a 6x2's or 4x3's he will earn between £750 - £2000 depending on tv/sky and how late notice
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by metropol »

Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
Mensa07
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 618
Joined: 14 Mar 2006, 06:12

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Mensa07 »

metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
show the guy a bit of respect eh?
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by josh fg »

metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
He is good at not taking much punishment which is why he's only been KOed by one Brit boxer in Naz, he does it for the cash and also I guess cos he likes the sport and young fighters get a lot out of fighting him.
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Poncey »

josh fg wrote:
metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
He is good at not taking much punishment which is why he's only been KOed by one Brit boxer in Naz, he does it for the cash and also I guess cos he likes the sport and young fighters get a lot out of fighting him.
And the Nas stoppage was a little questionable.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Asterix »

josh fg wrote:
metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
He is good at not taking much punishment which is why he's only been KOed by one Brit boxer in Naz, he does it for the cash and also I guess cos he likes the sport and young fighters get a lot out of fighting him.
Bradley Pryce - TKO in 2002.
Richard Evatt - TKO in 1999.
Colin McMillan - TKO in 1996.
Paul Lloyd - TKO in 1994.
Naseem Hamed - TKO in 1994.
Duke McKenzie - TKO in 1991 and in 1992.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by oliverfennell »

teddy007 wrote:
metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
Without people like peter buckley boxing would be no more so shut it and on the problems in later life front....why do you think hes had all those fights? Its because he knows how to look after himself whilst testing out a prosect. Get it mate.
Yes, metropol, Buckley's like the Queen Mother around these parts (except she's more likely to win a fight, even now), so be careful how you tread. Gawd luv 'im.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by oliverfennell »

They've got this law called 'lese majeste', which makes it a criminal offence to disrespect the king.

Which is exactly what I think of whenever anybody disrespects Peter Buckley on here and gets e-lynched.
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by metropol »

Mensa07 wrote:
metropol wrote:Tbh ive never seen him fight but with all those fights , he is bound to have problems in later life. He must either love fighting or has no other way of making money. What motivates him with such a crap record?
show the guy a bit of respect eh?
Now that I know that he has very few kos maybe he has good defensive skills or a very good chin. I was just trying to say that if your losing all the time your not really progressing anymore, so maybe it would be hard to keep going surley. He hasnt won in a while. Can any of you remember when he started out was he tipped to be any good?
seanshortfusehughes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 49
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 11:00

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by seanshortfusehughes »

hes got my respect totally, i think looking his last result other than a loss was a draw with me, im not proud to say i drew with a guy with a record like his but i am proud to say i shared a ring with a small hall legend like pete and people who knock him for his no of losses should realise to step between the ropes 290 plus time takes some doing. hat off to ya pete mate.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by rob h »

Its just a job for him, he's doing alot better than most winning fighters are mate.

Last time i saw him fight was in Wigan last year, he fought Kays and i was suprised at how much he DID get hit.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by oliverfennell »

seanshortfusehughes wrote:hes got my respect totally, i think looking his last result other than a loss was a draw with me, im not proud to say i drew with a guy with a record like his but i am proud to say i shared a ring with a small hall legend like pete and people who knock him for his no of losses should realise to step between the ropes 290 plus time takes some doing. hat off to ya pete mate.
Nice to see you here, Sean. Tell me, how was your fight with Buckley? He actually came to win for once? Or you just had the mother of all off-nights? No offence to you, it's just that Buckley doesn't even TRY to win these days, hasn't for years, so that result does look a bit of a mystery.
metropol
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 20 May 2008, 14:07

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by metropol »

rob h wrote:Its just a job for him, he's doing alot better than most winning fighters are mate.

Last time i saw him fight was in Wigan last year, he fought Kays and i was suprised at how much he DID get hit.
Do you mean he gets paid more than winning fighters or what?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28483
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Coco »

metropol wrote:
rob h wrote:Its just a job for him, he's doing alot better than most winning fighters are mate.

Last time i saw him fight was in Wigan last year, he fought Kays and i was suprised at how much he DID get hit.
Do you mean he gets paid more than wining fighters or what?
The likes of Buckley wouldn't get paid more by fight, but they earn their corn by fighting 15-20 times a year, whereas prospects would be unlikely to fight more than 6 times
1southpaw
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 858
Joined: 28 Apr 2007, 14:23

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by 1southpaw »

Rob Magic wrote:I was just sat browsing the ratings and for some reason had a thought. Peter Buckley has had 293 fights. Does he have a full-time job aswell as boxing or can he live comfortably on what he earns in the ring. I dont actually know what journeymen get paid today.

i might be wrong here but i always thought he had a cleaning company and was doing very well :TU:
seanshortfusehughes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 49
Joined: 30 Aug 2006, 11:00

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by seanshortfusehughes »

hes got my respect totally, i think looking his last result other than a loss was a draw with me, im not proud to say i drew with a guy with a record like his but i am proud to say i shared a ring with a small hall legend like pete and people who knock him for his no of losses should realise to step between the ropes 290 plus time takes some doing. hat off to ya pete mate.


Nice to see you here, Sean. Tell me, how was your fight with Buckley? He actually came to win for once? Or you just had the mother of all off-nights? No offence to you, it's just that Buckley doesn't even TRY to win these days, hasn't for years, so that result does look a bit of a mystery.

no not at all no off night, i hold my hands up i was dropped by an absolute peach of a left hook in the 5th round of a 6x2fight. i was cruising up til then and thought id won despite that. but ive got no excuse i was a bit flabbby and took the fight thinking id cruise it. i think he gave it a go more than ive seen in the past but i should have just boxed my way to a points win like every1 else does instead of trying to stop him. a learning fight like he does with every fighter.
whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by whicker »

Coco wrote:
The likes of Buckley wouldn't get paid more by fight, but they earn their corn by fighting 15-20 times a year, whereas prospects would be unlikely to fight more than 6 times
Exactly.

The only fighters who really get regular work are those who have records as durable fighters who typically lose.

A good example would be James Tucker and Matt Hainy. They fought a very good, close fight in Jan- I think it was Tucker's second and Hainy's debut. Hainy just shaded it. Since then Tucker has had about 10 fights, all points losses bar one draw, and Hainy, who is somewhat of a prospect, just 2.

Put another way, the regular work in boxing is for tough, durable fighters who are willing to travel the country, but are unlikley to win.
rob h
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 610
Joined: 15 Dec 2006, 08:36

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by rob h »

Coco answered the question mate :-)
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by oliverfennell »

seanshortfusehughes wrote:hes got my respect totally, i think looking his last result other than a loss was a draw with me, im not proud to say i drew with a guy with a record like his but i am proud to say i shared a ring with a small hall legend like pete and people who knock him for his no of losses should realise to step between the ropes 290 plus time takes some doing. hat off to ya pete mate.


Nice to see you here, Sean. Tell me, how was your fight with Buckley? He actually came to win for once? Or you just had the mother of all off-nights? No offence to you, it's just that Buckley doesn't even TRY to win these days, hasn't for years, so that result does look a bit of a mystery.

no not at all no off night, i hold my hands up i was dropped by an absolute peach of a left hook in the 5th round of a 6x2fight. i was cruising up til then and thought id won despite that. but ive got no excuse i was a bit flabbby and took the fight thinking id cruise it. i think he gave it a go more than ive seen in the past but i should have just boxed my way to a points win like every1 else does instead of trying to stop him. a learning fight like he does with every fighter.
Wow, so Buckley can still throw a decent shot! Maybe it was a reflex action, like when people still blink after being beheaded!

Seriously, though, thanks for the insight. Maybe, as you say, he was responding to your attempts to knock him out. Most of his fights seem to be a bit of a peace pact, but perhaps he still has the ability to put people in their place if he feels they're taking liberties.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6642
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by THEBUTCH »

Good posts, Sean Hughes. Respect from his peers will make up for some of the ignorant comments posted on here about Peter.

300 fights is well in sight for Buckley now. :TU:

I 'd love to see some of these burks walk 200 metres in Buckley's shoes, never mind the proverbial mile.
Podmore_Birmingham
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 950
Joined: 18 Oct 2005, 09:38

Re: Peter Buckley

Post by Podmore_Birmingham »

oliverfennell wrote: Most of his fights seem to be a bit of a peace pact, but perhaps he still has the ability to put people in their place if he feels they're taking liberties.
Happened last Thursday in Wolverhampton.

Scott Evans, who I think is a decent prospect, was beating Pete up for three rounds, but by the last Pete showed more a lot more guile. He stood and traded with heavy-handed Evans and landed with a couple of cracking left hands in the last minute that saw him get a good round of applause at the end.
Post Reply